Suppr超能文献

多方位及俯卧位ZOOMit扩散加权成像用于预测远端胃癌的T分期

Multi-orientation and prone-position ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting T stage in distal gastric cancer.

作者信息

Li Qiong, Cao Pei-Zhong, Wei Xiao-Xue, Yu Wen-Wei, Sang Zi-Tong, Hou Ya-Jun, Feng Qiu-Xia, Hsu Yi-Cheng, Darwish Omar, Sun Na-Na, Wu Fei-Yun, Liu Xi-Sheng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

MR Research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11638-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality of ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging (ZOOMit DWI) of distal gastric cancer in prone vs supine positioning and to determine whether multi-orientation ZOOMit DWI (M-ZOOMit) offers additional diagnostic value over axial ZOOMit DWI (A-ZOOMit).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This two-phase study enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed distal gastric cancer who underwent pre-treatment MRI. In phase 1 (November 2021 to February 2022), participants underwent ZOOMit DWI in both standard supine and prone positions. Two radiologists independently evaluated image quality on supine and prone ZOOMit DWI using a 5-point Likert scale. In phase 2 (March 2022 to September 2023), participants were imaged solely in the prone position; they subsequently underwent radical surgery. Histopathological findings served as the reference standard. The accuracy of T staging based on uni-orientation (axial, coronal, and sagittal) vs M-ZOOMit was assessed by four additional radiologists. Reader consistency and agreement on image quality scores were evaluated using κ-agreement and Kendall W analyses.

RESULTS

Phase 1 enrolled 30 patients (mean age, 62.0 years ± 11.5 [standard deviation]; 19 men); phase 2 enrolled 134 patients (mean age, 60.9 years ± 11.7; 81 men). Image quality scores assigned by both readers were significantly higher for prone ZOOMit DWI than for supine ZOOMit DWI (p < 0.001). Regarding overall T staging, M-ZOOMit and coronal ZOOMit DWI (C-ZOOMit) demonstrated significantly better performance relative to A-ZOOMit (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ZOOMit DWI in the prone position provides superior image quality. M-ZOOMit and C-ZOOMit enhance T staging accuracy compared to A-ZOOMit for distal gastric cancer.

KEY POINTS

Question DWI is a powerful technique, but poor image quality has remained a key limitation, hindering diagnostic accuracy for distal gastric cancer. Findings The prone-position ZOOMit DWI improved the image quality. Besides, multi-orientation and coronal ZOOMit DWI demonstrated superior performance relative to A-ZOOMit DWI for T staging. Clinical relevance The prone-position and M-ZOOMit DWI is a better imaging protocol for the T staging assessment of distal gastric cancer patients, replacing the conventional supine-position and axial DWI.

摘要

目的

比较远端胃癌在俯卧位与仰卧位时的ZOOMit扩散加权成像(ZOOMit DWI)图像质量,并确定多方位ZOOMit DWI(M-ZOOMit)相对于轴向ZOOMit DWI(A-ZOOMit)是否具有额外的诊断价值。

方法与材料

这项两阶段研究纳入了经活检确诊的远端胃癌且接受了治疗前MRI检查的患者。在第一阶段(2021年11月至2022年2月),参与者在标准仰卧位和俯卧位均接受了ZOOMit DWI检查。两名放射科医生使用5分李克特量表独立评估仰卧位和俯卧位ZOOMit DWI的图像质量。在第二阶段(2022年3月至2023年9月),参与者仅在俯卧位进行成像;随后他们接受了根治性手术。组织病理学结果作为参考标准。另外四名放射科医生评估基于单方位(轴向、冠状面和矢状面)与M-ZOOMit的T分期准确性。使用κ一致性分析和肯德尔W分析评估读者在图像质量评分上的一致性和一致性。

结果

第一阶段纳入了30名患者(平均年龄62.0岁±11.5[标准差];19名男性);第二阶段纳入了134名患者(平均年龄60.9岁±11.7;81名男性)。两位读者给出的俯卧位ZOOMit DWI图像质量评分均显著高于仰卧位ZOOMit DWI(p<0.001)。关于总体T分期,M-ZOOMit和冠状面ZOOMit DWI(C-ZOOMit)相对于A-ZOOMit表现出显著更好的性能(均p<0.05)。

结论

俯卧位的ZOOMit DWI提供了更高的图像质量。与A-ZOOMit相比,M-ZOOMit和C-ZOOMit提高了远端胃癌T分期的准确性。

关键点

问题DWI是一种强大的技术,但图像质量差一直是一个关键限制,阻碍了远端胃癌的诊断准确性。发现俯卧位的ZOOMit DWI改善了图像质量。此外,多方位和冠状面ZOOMit DWI在T分期方面相对于A-ZOOMit DWI表现出卓越的性能。临床意义俯卧位和M-ZOOMit DWI是用于远端胃癌患者T分期评估的更好的成像方案,取代了传统的仰卧位和轴向DWI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验