Li Qiong, Cao Pei-Zhong, Wei Xiao-Xue, Yu Wen-Wei, Sang Zi-Tong, Hou Ya-Jun, Feng Qiu-Xia, Hsu Yi-Cheng, Darwish Omar, Sun Na-Na, Wu Fei-Yun, Liu Xi-Sheng
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
MR Research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11638-6.
To compare the image quality of ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging (ZOOMit DWI) of distal gastric cancer in prone vs supine positioning and to determine whether multi-orientation ZOOMit DWI (M-ZOOMit) offers additional diagnostic value over axial ZOOMit DWI (A-ZOOMit).
This two-phase study enrolled patients with biopsy-confirmed distal gastric cancer who underwent pre-treatment MRI. In phase 1 (November 2021 to February 2022), participants underwent ZOOMit DWI in both standard supine and prone positions. Two radiologists independently evaluated image quality on supine and prone ZOOMit DWI using a 5-point Likert scale. In phase 2 (March 2022 to September 2023), participants were imaged solely in the prone position; they subsequently underwent radical surgery. Histopathological findings served as the reference standard. The accuracy of T staging based on uni-orientation (axial, coronal, and sagittal) vs M-ZOOMit was assessed by four additional radiologists. Reader consistency and agreement on image quality scores were evaluated using κ-agreement and Kendall W analyses.
Phase 1 enrolled 30 patients (mean age, 62.0 years ± 11.5 [standard deviation]; 19 men); phase 2 enrolled 134 patients (mean age, 60.9 years ± 11.7; 81 men). Image quality scores assigned by both readers were significantly higher for prone ZOOMit DWI than for supine ZOOMit DWI (p < 0.001). Regarding overall T staging, M-ZOOMit and coronal ZOOMit DWI (C-ZOOMit) demonstrated significantly better performance relative to A-ZOOMit (both p < 0.05).
ZOOMit DWI in the prone position provides superior image quality. M-ZOOMit and C-ZOOMit enhance T staging accuracy compared to A-ZOOMit for distal gastric cancer.
Question DWI is a powerful technique, but poor image quality has remained a key limitation, hindering diagnostic accuracy for distal gastric cancer. Findings The prone-position ZOOMit DWI improved the image quality. Besides, multi-orientation and coronal ZOOMit DWI demonstrated superior performance relative to A-ZOOMit DWI for T staging. Clinical relevance The prone-position and M-ZOOMit DWI is a better imaging protocol for the T staging assessment of distal gastric cancer patients, replacing the conventional supine-position and axial DWI.
比较远端胃癌在俯卧位与仰卧位时的ZOOMit扩散加权成像(ZOOMit DWI)图像质量,并确定多方位ZOOMit DWI(M-ZOOMit)相对于轴向ZOOMit DWI(A-ZOOMit)是否具有额外的诊断价值。
这项两阶段研究纳入了经活检确诊的远端胃癌且接受了治疗前MRI检查的患者。在第一阶段(2021年11月至2022年2月),参与者在标准仰卧位和俯卧位均接受了ZOOMit DWI检查。两名放射科医生使用5分李克特量表独立评估仰卧位和俯卧位ZOOMit DWI的图像质量。在第二阶段(2022年3月至2023年9月),参与者仅在俯卧位进行成像;随后他们接受了根治性手术。组织病理学结果作为参考标准。另外四名放射科医生评估基于单方位(轴向、冠状面和矢状面)与M-ZOOMit的T分期准确性。使用κ一致性分析和肯德尔W分析评估读者在图像质量评分上的一致性和一致性。
第一阶段纳入了30名患者(平均年龄62.0岁±11.5[标准差];19名男性);第二阶段纳入了134名患者(平均年龄60.9岁±11.7;81名男性)。两位读者给出的俯卧位ZOOMit DWI图像质量评分均显著高于仰卧位ZOOMit DWI(p<0.001)。关于总体T分期,M-ZOOMit和冠状面ZOOMit DWI(C-ZOOMit)相对于A-ZOOMit表现出显著更好的性能(均p<0.05)。
俯卧位的ZOOMit DWI提供了更高的图像质量。与A-ZOOMit相比,M-ZOOMit和C-ZOOMit提高了远端胃癌T分期的准确性。
问题DWI是一种强大的技术,但图像质量差一直是一个关键限制,阻碍了远端胃癌的诊断准确性。发现俯卧位的ZOOMit DWI改善了图像质量。此外,多方位和冠状面ZOOMit DWI在T分期方面相对于A-ZOOMit DWI表现出卓越的性能。临床意义俯卧位和M-ZOOMit DWI是用于远端胃癌患者T分期评估的更好的成像方案,取代了传统的仰卧位和轴向DWI。