• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照护者照护模式在全科医疗中的实施与可接受性:一项混合方法可行性研究

Implementation and acceptability of the Caregiver Care Model in general practice: a mixed-method feasibility study.

作者信息

Nielsen Mette Kjaergaard, Vinther Marie Cecilie, Guldin Mai-Britt, Christensen Kaj Sparle, Mygind Anna

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 1;26(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x
PMID:40312660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12044925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Being a caregiver can be demanding. Therefore, we developed the Caregiver Care Model for general practice. The model consists of a mandatory dialogue questionnaire, which is used to identify support needs in caregivers, grief-facilitating questions, and an overview of community-based caregiver initiatives for caregivers in need of support. We aimed to test the implementation and acceptability of the model in general practice.

METHODS

We used a fixed, convergent, mixed-methods approach to test the model in five general practices in the Central Denmark Region among 40 caregivers. Quantitative data included monitoring data collected by health professionals in an online database at inclusion and after each consultation. Qualitative data were derived from five introductory meetings and semi-structured interviews with ten health professionals. The analysis focused on the implementation (delivery and process) and the health professionals' acceptability of the model.

RESULTS

All 40 caregivers participated in the first consultation, and 29 (73%) had two or more consultations. Eight caregivers (20%) were referred to community-based initiatives or a private-practice psychologist. The mandatory dialogue questionnaire was completed by 30 (75%) caregivers prior to the first consultation, and it was rated useful by general practitioners (GPs) and staff in 26 (74%) of encounters. GPs and staff perceived the dialogue questionnaire to be useful to direct the first consultations towards the most relevant issues, whereas the usefulness of the facilitating questions was unclear due to the brief introduction to them. The list of community-based initiatives was considered useful in urban areas, but not in rural areas with long distance to initiatives. Here, support from general practice was needed to promote mental health in caregivers and avoid sick leave.

CONCLUSION

The Caregiver Care Model was in line with core values of general practice and the dialogue questionnaire targeted the consultations on relevant issues for the caregiver. Health professionals provided targeted support, including follow-up consultations and referred a group for community-based initiatives, especially caregivers in urban settings. The findings call for increased focus on caregivers and education of general practitioners and staff to facilitate caregiver reactions in connection with loss and grief.

摘要

背景

作为照顾者可能要求很高。因此,我们开发了适用于全科医疗的照顾者关怀模式。该模式包括一份强制性对话问卷,用于识别照顾者的支持需求、促进悲伤情绪的问题,以及为需要支持的照顾者提供的基于社区的照顾者倡议概述。我们旨在测试该模式在全科医疗中的实施情况和可接受性。

方法

我们采用固定、收敛、混合方法在丹麦中部地区的五家全科医疗机构对40名照顾者进行测试。定量数据包括健康专业人员在纳入时以及每次咨询后在在线数据库中收集的监测数据。定性数据来自五次介绍会以及对十名健康专业人员的半结构化访谈。分析重点在于该模式的实施(交付和过程)以及健康专业人员对该模式的可接受性。

结果

所有40名照顾者都参加了首次咨询,29名(73%)进行了两次或更多次咨询。八名照顾者(20%)被转介至基于社区的倡议或私人执业心理学家处。30名(75%)照顾者在首次咨询前完成了强制性对话问卷,在26次(74%)会诊中,全科医生(GP)和工作人员认为该问卷很有用。全科医生和工作人员认为对话问卷有助于将首次咨询导向最相关的问题,而由于对促进悲伤情绪问题的介绍简短,其有用性尚不清楚。基于社区的倡议清单在城市地区被认为有用,但在距离倡议地点较远的农村地区则不然。在此类地区,需要全科医疗的支持来促进照顾者的心理健康并避免病假。

结论

照顾者关怀模式符合全科医疗的核心价值观,对话问卷针对照顾者的相关问题进行会诊。健康专业人员提供了有针对性的支持,包括后续咨询,并将一组人转介至基于社区的倡议,尤其是城市地区的照顾者。研究结果呼吁更加关注照顾者,并对全科医生和工作人员进行教育,以促进照顾者在面对丧失和悲伤时的反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a234/12044925/b4f61cfe462f/12875_2025_2833_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a234/12044925/b4f61cfe462f/12875_2025_2833_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a234/12044925/b4f61cfe462f/12875_2025_2833_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and acceptability of the Caregiver Care Model in general practice: a mixed-method feasibility study.照护者照护模式在全科医疗中的实施与可接受性:一项混合方法可行性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 1;26(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02833-x.
2
How to support caregivers in general practice: development of the Caregiver Care Model.如何在全科医疗中支持照护者:照护者关怀模式的发展
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 26;18:26323524241272103. doi: 10.1177/26323524241272103. eCollection 2024.
3
Strengthening the spiritual domain in palliative care through a listening consultation service by spiritual caregivers in Dutch PaTz-groups: an evaluation study.通过荷兰 PaTz 小组的精神照护者的倾听咨询服务来增强姑息治疗中的精神领域:一项评估研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jun 29;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00595-0.
4
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics working in general practice: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.护理人员在全科医疗中的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法的现实主义评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(6):1-137. doi: 10.3310/GTJJ3104.
6
Comparing perspectives of family caregivers and healthcare professionals regarding caregiver burden in dementia care: results of a mixed methods study in a rural setting.比较痴呆症护理中家庭照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对照顾者负担的观点:农村环境中混合方法研究的结果。
Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):199-207. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz165.
7
Identifying the needs of natural caregivers caring for a person with dementia: a mixed method study.识别痴呆症患者自然照料者的需求:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 21;26(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02724-1.
8
Feasibility evaluation of a stepped procedure to identify community-dwelling frail older people in general practice. A mixed methods study.在全科医疗中采用逐步程序识别社区居住体弱老年人的可行性评估。一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Jun;20(2):107-13. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.827167. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
9
Implementing the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines: a mixed methods study and cluster randomised trial of a model osteoarthritis consultation in primary care--the Management of OsteoArthritis In Consultations (MOSAICS) study protocol.实施英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)骨关节炎指南:一项混合方法研究及基层医疗中骨关节炎会诊示范的整群随机试验——会诊中骨关节炎管理(MOSAICS)研究方案
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 27;9:95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0095-y.
10
Palliative care consultations in primary care: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners.初级保健中的姑息治疗咨询:荷兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):e30. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000967. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Grief trajectories and long-term health effects in bereaved relatives: a prospective, population-based cohort study with ten-year follow-up.bereaved亲属的悲伤轨迹和长期健康影响:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究,随访十年
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 25;13:1619730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1619730. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
How to support caregivers in general practice: development of the Caregiver Care Model.如何在全科医疗中支持照护者:照护者关怀模式的发展
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 26;18:26323524241272103. doi: 10.1177/26323524241272103. eCollection 2024.
2
Supporting family carers in general practice: a scoping review of clinical guidelines and recommendations.全科医疗中支持家庭照料者:临床指南和建议的范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 6;24(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02188-1.
3
Exploring concepts and trends in informal caregiver burden: systematic review using citation network and content analysis.
探索非正式照料者负担的概念与趋势:运用引文网络和内容分析的系统综述
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Dec;35(12):2873-2885. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02582-w. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
4
The integrated process model of loss and grief - An interprofessional understanding.失落与悲伤的综合处理模式——一种跨专业的理解。
Death Stud. 2024;48(7):738-752. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2272960. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
5
Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review.十年实施结果研究:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z.
6
Reducing health inequalities through general practice.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e463-e472. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00093-2.
7
Involving patients in medicines optimisation in general practice: a development study of the "PREparing Patients for Active Involvement in medication Review" (PREPAIR) tool.将患者纳入一般实践中的药物优化:“准备患者积极参与药物审查”(PREPAIR)工具的开发研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 May 20;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01733-8.
8
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
9
Process, content, and experiences of delivering the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) in the Danish specialised palliative care setting.在丹麦专业姑息治疗环境中实施照顾者支持需求评估工具干预(CSNAT-I)的过程、内容和体验。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06432-1. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
10
Exploring implementation processes in general practice in a feedback intervention aiming to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing: a qualitative study among general practitioners.在一项旨在减少潜在不适当处方的反馈干预措施中探索全科医疗中的实施过程:一项针对全科医生的定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jan 7;2(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00106-5.