• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的免疫特征定义了三种脓毒症恢复轨迹:一项多队列机器学习研究。

Distinct immunological signatures define three sepsis recovery trajectories: a multi-cohort machine learning study.

作者信息

Zhang Rui, Long Fang, Wu Jingyi, Tan Ruoming

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhuzhou Lukou District People's Hospital, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 17;12:1575237. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1575237. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1575237
PMID:40313554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12045099/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Understanding heterogeneous recovery patterns in sepsis is crucial for personalizing treatment strategies and improving outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To identify distinct recovery trajectories in sepsis and develop a prediction model using early clinical and immunological markers.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study using data from 28,745 adult patients admitted to 12 intensive care units (ICUs) with sepsis between January 2014 and December 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome was the 28-day trajectory of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 24,450 eligible patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [15.3] years; 54.2% male), three distinct recovery trajectories were identified: rapid recovery (42.3%), slow recovery (35.8%), and deterioration (21.9%). The machine learning model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87) for trajectory prediction. Key predictors included initial SOFA score, lactate levels, and inflammatory markers. Mortality rates were 12.3, 28.7, and 45.6% for rapid, slow, and deterioration groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Early prediction of sepsis recovery trajectories is feasible and may facilitate personalized treatment strategies. The developed model could assist clinical decision-making and resource allocation in critical care settings.

摘要

重要性

了解脓毒症的异质性恢复模式对于个性化治疗策略和改善治疗结果至关重要。

目的

识别脓毒症中不同的恢复轨迹,并使用早期临床和免疫标志物开发预测模型。

设计、设置和参与者:回顾性队列研究,使用2014年1月至2024年12月期间入住12个重症监护病房(ICU)的28745例成年脓毒症患者的数据。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的28天轨迹。次要结局包括90天死亡率和住院时间。

结果

在24450例符合条件的患者中(平均[标准差]年龄,64.5[15.3]岁;54.2%为男性),识别出三种不同的恢复轨迹:快速恢复(42.3%)、缓慢恢复(35.8%)和恶化(21.9%)。机器学习模型在轨迹预测方面的曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.85(95%CI,0.83-0.87)。关键预测因素包括初始SOFA评分、乳酸水平和炎症标志物。快速、缓慢和恶化组的死亡率分别为12.3%、28.7%和45.6%。

结论和相关性

脓毒症恢复轨迹的早期预测是可行的,可能有助于制定个性化治疗策略。所开发的模型可协助重症监护环境中的临床决策和资源分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/9908a8e28c24/fmed-12-1575237-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/fb684fab3fb1/fmed-12-1575237-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/9804b43822a4/fmed-12-1575237-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/9908a8e28c24/fmed-12-1575237-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/fb684fab3fb1/fmed-12-1575237-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/9804b43822a4/fmed-12-1575237-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c001/12045099/9908a8e28c24/fmed-12-1575237-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Distinct immunological signatures define three sepsis recovery trajectories: a multi-cohort machine learning study.不同的免疫特征定义了三种脓毒症恢复轨迹:一项多队列机器学习研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 17;12:1575237. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1575237. eCollection 2025.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
3
Prediction of Mortality and Major Adverse Kidney Events in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury.预测重症急性肾损伤患者的死亡率和主要不良肾脏事件。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Jan;81(1):36-47. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
INFORMING INTENSIVE CARE UNIT DIGITAL TWINS: DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF CARDIORESPIRATORY FAILURE TRAJECTORIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS.为重症监护病房数字孪生体提供信息:脓毒症患者心肺功能衰竭轨迹的动态评估
Shock. 2025 Apr 1;63(4):573-578. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002536. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
5
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
6
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score for predicting mortality in patients with sepsis in Vietnamese intensive care units: a multicentre, cross-sectional study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分预测越南重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡率:一项多中心、横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e064870. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064870.
7
Enhanced bedside mortality prediction combining point-of-care lactate and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in patients hospitalised with suspected infection in southeast Asia: a cohort study.在东南亚因疑似感染住院的患者中,结合床边即时乳酸和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分增强的床边死亡率预测:一项队列研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Sep;10(9):e1281-e1288. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00277-7.
8
Assessing SOFA score trajectories in sepsis using machine learning: A pragmatic approach to improve the accuracy of mortality prediction.使用机器学习评估脓毒症 SOFA 评分轨迹:提高死亡率预测准确性的实用方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300739. eCollection 2024.
9
Sepsis subphenotyping based on organ dysfunction trajectory.基于器官功能轨迹的脓毒症亚表型分型。
Crit Care. 2022 Jul 3;26(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04071-4.
10
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Modulates the Inflammatory Milieu and Organ Failure Trajectory in Severe COVID-19 and Sepsis.体外膜肺氧合调节重症 COVID-19 和脓毒症中的炎症环境及器官衰竭进程。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 13;14(12):4224. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124224.

本文引用的文献

1
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
2
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
Temperature Trajectory Subphenotypes Correlate With Immune Responses in Patients With Sepsis.体温轨迹亚表型与脓毒症患者的免疫反应相关。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):1645-1653. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004610.
4
Real-World Integration of a Sepsis Deep Learning Technology Into Routine Clinical Care: Implementation Study.将脓毒症深度学习技术实际整合到常规临床护理中的实施研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 15;8(7):e15182. doi: 10.2196/15182.
5
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
6
Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.新型败血症临床表型的推导、验证及潜在治疗意义。
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2003-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791.
7
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.基于电子病历的机器学习模型开发与验证:用于预测无已知认知障碍的新入院患者发生谵妄的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1018.
8
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.
9
A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database.电子数据库中脓毒症识别方法的比较分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):494-499. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002965.
10
Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review.脓毒症康复的促进:综述
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):62-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17687.