• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过TMT标记蛋白质组学结合转录组数据验证亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮的生物标志物

Verification of biological markers of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus via TMT labelling proteomics combined with transcriptome data.

作者信息

Tao Yuan, Hua Guo, Min Sun, Xiao-Hong Lu, Jia-Hui Jiang, Biao Tang, Cai-Feng He, Cheng Zhang, Chao Ci, Jian-Ping Wu

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Yijishan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

Department of Dermatology, The Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2500696. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2500696. Epub 2025 May 5.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2500696
PMID:40323689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12054568/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate biological markers in subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).

METHODS

The tandem mass tag (TMT)-labelling proteomics method was used to explore differentially expressed proteins between SCLE lesions and normal skin tissues. The differences in transcriptomic data between SCLE tissues and normal skin tissues were analysed from the GEO database (GSE81071, GSE109248 and GSE112943). The differences in transcriptomic data from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and normal controls were analysed (GSE81622 and GSE154851). The 35 healthy controls, 30 SCLE patients, 35 SLE patients and 30 lupus nephritis (LN) patients were diagnosed and enrolled. The serum expression levels of IFI44 and EPSTI1 were detected. Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation or frequency and were analysed using Student's -test, Chi-square test and one-way ANOVA between the groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyse the clinical efficacy of IFI44 and EPSTI1 in distinguishing SCLE from SLE.

RESULTS

In a comparative analysis of SCLE lesions and normal skin tissues, proteomics studies identified 376 proteins that exhibited significant differential expression. In GO and KEGG analyses, the enriched terms mainly included the interferon-gamma-mediated signalling pathway ( < .001), immune receptor activity ( < .001) and cell adhesion molecules ( < .001). The top 10 hub genes were screened in SCLE as follows: CD8A, CXCL10, IFI44, CD7, CCL5, TLR4, EPSTI1, ISG15, KLRD1 and SELL using Cytoscape (3.10.1) software. The 15 common proteins/genes between proteomics and three datasets results were found, including CXCL10, OAS1, DDX60L, CFB, IFI6, HERC6, IFI44L, GBP1, EPSTI1, OAS2, CXCL11, TYMP, IFI44, ISG15 and IFIT3. The 61 differentially expressed genes in GSE81622 and the top 100 differentially expressed genes in GSE154851, alongside the 15 identified genes described above through Venn diagram analysis. Four common genes, IFI44L, IFI44, EPSTI1 and OAS1, were identified. Two common genes, IFI44 and EPSTI1, were found in hub genes from the proteomics results. The serum levels of IFI44 and EPSTI1 in LN were significantly higher than those in SLE patients ( < .05). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that serum levels of IFI44 and EPSTI1 could differentiate SCLE from SLE with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.898 and 0.847, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The IFI44 and EPSTI1 proved to be closely involved in the progression from SCLE to SLE, and can represent new candidate diagnostic molecular markers of occurrence and progression of SCLE.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮(SCLE)中的生物标志物。

方法

采用串联质谱标签(TMT)标记蛋白质组学方法,探索SCLE皮损与正常皮肤组织之间差异表达的蛋白质。从基因表达综合数据库(GEO数据库,GSE81071、GSE109248和GSE112943)分析SCLE组织与正常皮肤组织转录组数据的差异。分析系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者与正常对照外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)转录组数据的差异(GSE81622和GSE154851)。诊断并纳入35名健康对照、30名SCLE患者、35名SLE患者和30名狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者。检测IFI44和EPSTI1的血清表达水平。数据以平均值±标准差或频数表示,组间分析采用Student's t检验、卡方检验和单因素方差分析。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析IFI44和EPSTI1区分SCLE与SLE的临床效能。

结果

在SCLE皮损与正常皮肤组织的对比分析中,蛋白质组学研究鉴定出376种表现出显著差异表达的蛋白质。在基因本体(GO)和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)分析中,富集的条目主要包括γ干扰素介导的信号通路(P<0.001)、免疫受体活性(P<0.001)和细胞黏附分子(P<0.001)。使用Cytoscape(3.10.1)软件在SCLE中筛选出前10个枢纽基因如下:CD8A、CXCL10、IFI44、CD7、CCL5、TLR4、EPSTI1、ISG15、KLRD1和SELL。发现蛋白质组学与三个数据集结果之间有15种共同的蛋白质/基因,包括CXCL10、OAS1、DDX60L、CFB、IFI6、HERC6、IFI44L、GBP1、EPSTI1、OAS2、CXCL11、TYMP、IFI44、ISG15和IFIT3。通过维恩图分析GSE81622中的61个差异表达基因和GSE154851中的前100个差异表达基因,以及上述鉴定出的15个基因。鉴定出4个共同基因,IFI44L、IFI44、EPSTI1和OAS1。在蛋白质组学结果的枢纽基因中发现2个共同基因,IFI44和EPSTI1。LN患者血清中IFI44和EPSTI1水平显著高于SLE患者(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析表明,IFI44和EPSTI1血清水平可区分SCLE与SLE,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.898和0.847。

结论

IFI44和EPSTI1被证明与SCLE向SLE的进展密切相关,可作为SCLE发生和进展的新的候选诊断分子标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/8fd2f4c037f7/IANN_A_2500696_F0009_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/42d60ba136eb/IANN_A_2500696_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/840c58ed4901/IANN_A_2500696_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/1e78680262b5/IANN_A_2500696_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/ea9b285a4c80/IANN_A_2500696_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/67cab9bc37f2/IANN_A_2500696_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/eeed95aaaa3e/IANN_A_2500696_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/9cad49553215/IANN_A_2500696_F0007_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/63bd1c519d9c/IANN_A_2500696_F0008_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/8fd2f4c037f7/IANN_A_2500696_F0009_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/42d60ba136eb/IANN_A_2500696_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/840c58ed4901/IANN_A_2500696_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/1e78680262b5/IANN_A_2500696_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/ea9b285a4c80/IANN_A_2500696_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/67cab9bc37f2/IANN_A_2500696_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/eeed95aaaa3e/IANN_A_2500696_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/9cad49553215/IANN_A_2500696_F0007_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/63bd1c519d9c/IANN_A_2500696_F0008_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd85/12054568/8fd2f4c037f7/IANN_A_2500696_F0009_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Verification of biological markers of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus via TMT labelling proteomics combined with transcriptome data.通过TMT标记蛋白质组学结合转录组数据验证亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮的生物标志物
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2500696. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2500696. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
Identification of EPSTI1 as a new potential biomarker for SLE based on GEO database.基于基因表达综合数据库(GEO数据库)鉴定EPSTI1作为系统性红斑狼疮的一种新的潜在生物标志物。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 May;43(5):1531-1540. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06881-z. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
3
Identification of Significant Genes and Pathways for the Chronic and Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus via Bioinformatics Analysis.基于生物信息学分析鉴定慢性和亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮的关键基因和通路。
Dis Markers. 2022 Sep 29;2022:9891299. doi: 10.1155/2022/9891299. eCollection 2022.
4
Identification of key interferon-stimulated genes for indicating the condition of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.鉴定干扰素刺激基因以指示系统性红斑狼疮患者的病情。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 28;13:962393. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.962393. eCollection 2022.
5
Identification of key biomarkers and immune infiltration in systemic lupus erythematosus by integrated bioinformatics analysis.通过综合生物信息学分析鉴定系统性红斑狼疮中的关键生物标志物和免疫浸润
J Transl Med. 2021 Jan 19;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02698-x.
6
Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus versus systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnostic criteria and therapeutic implications.亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮与系统性红斑狼疮:诊断标准及治疗意义
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 Mar;38(3):405-12. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70497-9.
7
CXCL13 is an activity marker for systemic, but not cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a longitudinal cohort study.CXCL13 是系统性红斑狼疮而非皮肤性红斑狼疮的活动标志物:一项纵向队列研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Aug;310(6):485-493. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1836-6. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
IL-17 in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.白细胞介素-17 在盘状红斑狼疮中的作用。
Eur J Intern Med. 2010 Jun;21(3):202-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
9
Skin CD4 Trm cells distinguish acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus from localized discoid lupus erythematosus/subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and other skin diseases.皮肤 CD4 Trm 细胞可将急性皮肤红斑狼疮与局限性盘状红斑狼疮/亚急性皮肤红斑狼疮和其他皮肤病区分开来。
J Autoimmun. 2022 Apr;128:102811. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102811. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
10
Using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria to determine the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in patients with subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).采用美国风湿病学会(ACR)和系统性红斑狼疮国际协作诊所(SLICC)的标准来确定亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮(SCLE)患者的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)诊断。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 May;74(5):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.029. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-enabled precision medicine for inflammatory skin diseases.用于炎症性皮肤病的人工智能精准医学。
ArXiv. 2025 May 14:arXiv:2505.09527v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of EPSTI1 as a new potential biomarker for SLE based on GEO database.基于基因表达综合数据库(GEO数据库)鉴定EPSTI1作为系统性红斑狼疮的一种新的潜在生物标志物。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 May;43(5):1531-1540. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06881-z. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
2
Identification and Clinical Correlation Analysis of IFI44 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Combined with Bioinformatics and Immune Infiltration Analysis.系统性红斑狼疮中IFI44的鉴定及临床相关性分析并结合生物信息学和免疫浸润分析
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Aug 1;16:3219-3231. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S419880. eCollection 2023.
3
Integrated Proteomics to Understand the Role of Neuritin (NRN1) as a Mediator of Cognitive Resilience to Alzheimer's Disease.
综合蛋白质组学研究神经黏附素(NRN1)在阿尔茨海默病认知弹性中的作用。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2023 May;22(5):100542. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100542. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review of etiopathogenic, clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.皮肤红斑狼疮:发病机制、临床、诊断和治疗方面的综述。
An Bras Dermatol. 2023 May-Jun;98(3):355-372. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2022.09.005. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Combined proteomics and single cell RNA-sequencing analysis to identify biomarkers of disease diagnosis and disease exacerbation for systemic lupus erythematosus.联合蛋白质组学和单细胞 RNA 测序分析,以鉴定系统性红斑狼疮疾病诊断和疾病恶化的生物标志物。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 29;13:969509. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.969509. eCollection 2022.
6
2020 Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.《2020年中国系统性红斑狼疮诊断和治疗指南》
Rheumatol Immunol Res. 2020 Dec 1;1(1):5-23. doi: 10.2478/rir-2020-0009. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Identification of key interferon-stimulated genes for indicating the condition of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.鉴定干扰素刺激基因以指示系统性红斑狼疮患者的病情。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 28;13:962393. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.962393. eCollection 2022.
8
Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A facultative paraneoplastic dermatosis.亚急性皮肤型红斑狼疮:一种偶发的副肿瘤性皮肤病。
Clin Dermatol. 2022 Nov-Dec;40(6):728-742. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
9
Knockdown of EPSTI1 alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury through regulation of NF-κB signaling in a cellular pneumonia model.敲低 EPSTI1 通过调节 NF-κB 信号通路减轻脂多糖诱导的细胞肺炎模型中的炎症损伤。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2022 May 1;50(3):106-112. doi: 10.15586/aei.v50i3.581. eCollection 2022.
10
Identification and Validation of IFI44 as Key Biomarker in Lupus Nephritis.狼疮性肾炎关键生物标志物IFI44的鉴定与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 25;8:762848. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762848. eCollection 2021.