Ngai Hiu-Lam, Cheng Sau-Wan, Tse Tin-Sum, Lee Hung Kay, Shaw Pang-Chui
School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
LDS YYC R&D Centre for Chinese Medicine and State Key Laboratory of Research on Bioactivities and Clinical Applications of Medicinal Plants, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0323084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323084. eCollection 2025.
Isatidis Folium (Daqingye, DQY) and Isatidis Radix (Banlangen, BLG) are the leaf and root of the plant Isatis tinctoria Fort. (syn. Isatis indigotica Fort.), commonly prescribed for detoxification, and the inhibition of viral and oxidative activities. Given their widespread use, we set forth to investigate the authenticity and chemical composition of DQY and BLG samples obtained from eighteen administrative districts in the Hong Kong market.
The present study screened the identities and chemical composition of DQY and BLG through molecular authentication and HPLC methods, respectively. Molecular authentication utilized DNA barcoding, focusing on nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast regions. The HPLC methods were conducted in accordance with the Hong Kong Chinese Materia Medica Standards (HKCMMS).
We found that only one sample was genuine according to the species definition in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia and HKCMMS for both herbs. The chemical composition of the adulterated and the genuine samples were completely different, that the adulterant samples did not have the standard chemical markers epigoitrin and indirubin of Banlangen and Daqingye as listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia.
Our investigation underscores the widespread substitution by Strobilanthes (Nanbanlangen and Nandaqingye) species, mainly due to the preference of use of this herb in southern China. The adulteration of Daqingye by Blumea balsamifera (Ainaxiang) was probably due to mislabeling in the herb shop, though the error might have originated from the supplying sources. We recommend providing education on the necessity of using authentic Daqingye and Banlangen, especially in combined regimens, to standardize treatment effects. More education is also needed on the morphological differentiation of Banlangen from Nanbanlangen and Daqingye from Nandaqingye. The implementation of a track-and-trace system is strongly recommended to prevent and deter incorrect supply chain practices that lead to substitution or adulteration.
大青叶和板蓝根分别为菘蓝(Isatis tinctoria Fort.,同义名:Isatis indigotica Fort.)的叶和根,常用于解毒以及抑制病毒和氧化活性。鉴于其广泛应用,我们着手调查从香港市场18个行政区获取的大青叶和板蓝根样本的真伪及化学成分。
本研究分别通过分子鉴定和高效液相色谱法对大青叶和板蓝根的身份及化学成分进行筛选。分子鉴定采用DNA条形码技术,聚焦于核糖体和叶绿体区域。高效液相色谱法按照香港中药材标准(HKCMMS)进行。
根据《中国药典》和HKCMMS中两种药材的物种定义,我们发现仅一个样本为真品。掺假样本和真品样本的化学成分完全不同,掺假样本没有《中国药典》中所列板蓝根和大青叶的标准化学标志物表告依春和靛玉红。
我们的调查强调了爵床属(南板蓝根和南大青叶)物种的广泛替代,主要原因是中国南方对该药材的使用偏好。大青叶被艾纳香掺假可能是由于药店贴错标签,尽管错误可能源于供应源头。我们建议开展关于使用正品大青叶和板蓝根必要性的教育,尤其是在联合用药方案中,以规范治疗效果。还需要更多关于板蓝根与南板蓝根以及大青叶与南大青叶形态学差异的教育。强烈建议实施追溯系统,以预防和阻止导致替代或掺假的不正确供应链行为。