Suppr超能文献

调查职业治疗中级护理中积极冒险障碍对出院决策的影响强度:一项析因调查。

Investigating the effect strength of positive risk-taking barriers on discharge decisions in occupational therapy intermediate care: A factorial survey.

作者信息

Newman Craig, Whitehead Phillip, Thomson Mary

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Apr;86(4):293-301. doi: 10.1177/03080226221141320. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Positive risk-taking in occupational therapy intermediate care is a requirement, yet little is known about how positive risk-taking barriers influence discharge decisions at different experience levels.

METHOD

A factorial survey was used to investigate positive risk-taking barriers (Limited Capacity, Risk Averse Family, Blame Culture and No Support). Participants self-categorised their experience level into Novice or Semi-expert or Expert before analysing four vignettes relating to recommending a home discharge for an older adult. Data were analysed using Multiple Regression and One-Way Analysis of Variance.

RESULTS

Seventy-four participants responded to two hundred eighty-one vignettes. The barriers that reduced the likelihood to recommend a home discharge for an older adult were 'No Support', Novices (β = -0.315,  = 0.002), Semi-experts (β = -0.313,  = 0.001) Experts (β = -0.254,  = 0.009); 'Limited Capacity', Novices (β = -0.305,  < 0.003), Semi-experts (β = -0.254,  = 0.006) Experts (β = -0.376,  = 0.001) and 'Blame Culture' Semi-experts (β = -0.240,  = 0.010). Novices were found to be less likely to recommend a home discharge by comparison.

CONCLUSION

The 'Limited Capacity', 'No Support' and 'Blame Culture' barriers had the strongest effect and Novices were less likely to recommend a home discharge overall. These findings could inform future research and pre-registration Occupational Therapy education.

摘要

引言

在职业治疗中级护理中进行积极的冒险是一项要求,但对于积极冒险障碍如何影响不同经验水平的出院决策知之甚少。

方法

采用析因调查来研究积极冒险障碍(能力有限、规避风险的家庭、责备文化和缺乏支持)。在分析与建议一位老年人居家出院相关的四个 vignette 之前,参与者将自己的经验水平自我分类为新手、半专家或专家。使用多元回归和单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

74 名参与者对 281 个 vignette 做出了回应。降低为老年人推荐居家出院可能性的障碍有“缺乏支持”,新手(β = -0.315,p = 0.002)、半专家(β = -0.313,p = 0.001)、专家(β = -0.254,p = 0.009);“能力有限”,新手(β = -0.305,p < 0.003)、半专家(β = -0.254,p = 0.006)、专家(β = -0.376,p = 0.001)以及“责备文化”,半专家(β = -0.240,p = 0.010)。相比之下,新手不太可能推荐居家出院。

结论

“能力有限”、“缺乏支持”和“责备文化”障碍影响最强,新手总体上不太可能推荐居家出院。这些发现可为未来的研究和职业治疗预注册教育提供参考。

相似文献

8
Clinical decision making, risk and occupational therapy.
Health Soc Care Community. 1998 Jan;6(1):47-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1998.00093.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of care transition and hospital discharge.患者转院和出院管理。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Mar;30(3):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0885-6. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
3
When to use the Bonferroni correction.何时使用邦费罗尼校正。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12131. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
6
Community occupational therapists' clinical reasoning: identifying tacit knowledge.社区职业治疗师的临床推理:识别隐性知识。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Dec;57(6):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00875.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
8
Caregiver perspectives on safety in home dementia care.照顾者对家庭痴呆症护理安全的看法。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Dec;29(8):993-1014. doi: 10.1177/0193945907303098. Epub 2007 Jul 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验