• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查职业治疗中级护理中积极冒险障碍对出院决策的影响强度:一项析因调查。

Investigating the effect strength of positive risk-taking barriers on discharge decisions in occupational therapy intermediate care: A factorial survey.

作者信息

Newman Craig, Whitehead Phillip, Thomson Mary

机构信息

Department of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Apr;86(4):293-301. doi: 10.1177/03080226221141320. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1177/03080226221141320
PMID:40337482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033826/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Positive risk-taking in occupational therapy intermediate care is a requirement, yet little is known about how positive risk-taking barriers influence discharge decisions at different experience levels.

METHOD

A factorial survey was used to investigate positive risk-taking barriers (Limited Capacity, Risk Averse Family, Blame Culture and No Support). Participants self-categorised their experience level into Novice or Semi-expert or Expert before analysing four vignettes relating to recommending a home discharge for an older adult. Data were analysed using Multiple Regression and One-Way Analysis of Variance.

RESULTS

Seventy-four participants responded to two hundred eighty-one vignettes. The barriers that reduced the likelihood to recommend a home discharge for an older adult were 'No Support', Novices (β = -0.315,  = 0.002), Semi-experts (β = -0.313,  = 0.001) Experts (β = -0.254,  = 0.009); 'Limited Capacity', Novices (β = -0.305,  < 0.003), Semi-experts (β = -0.254,  = 0.006) Experts (β = -0.376,  = 0.001) and 'Blame Culture' Semi-experts (β = -0.240,  = 0.010). Novices were found to be less likely to recommend a home discharge by comparison.

CONCLUSION

The 'Limited Capacity', 'No Support' and 'Blame Culture' barriers had the strongest effect and Novices were less likely to recommend a home discharge overall. These findings could inform future research and pre-registration Occupational Therapy education.

摘要

引言

在职业治疗中级护理中进行积极的冒险是一项要求,但对于积极冒险障碍如何影响不同经验水平的出院决策知之甚少。

方法

采用析因调查来研究积极冒险障碍(能力有限、规避风险的家庭、责备文化和缺乏支持)。在分析与建议一位老年人居家出院相关的四个 vignette 之前,参与者将自己的经验水平自我分类为新手、半专家或专家。使用多元回归和单因素方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

74 名参与者对 281 个 vignette 做出了回应。降低为老年人推荐居家出院可能性的障碍有“缺乏支持”,新手(β = -0.315,p = 0.002)、半专家(β = -0.313,p = 0.001)、专家(β = -0.254,p = 0.009);“能力有限”,新手(β = -0.305,p < 0.003)、半专家(β = -0.254,p = 0.006)、专家(β = -0.376,p = 0.001)以及“责备文化”,半专家(β = -0.240,p = 0.010)。相比之下,新手不太可能推荐居家出院。

结论

“能力有限”、“缺乏支持”和“责备文化”障碍影响最强,新手总体上不太可能推荐居家出院。这些发现可为未来的研究和职业治疗预注册教育提供参考。

相似文献

1
Investigating the effect strength of positive risk-taking barriers on discharge decisions in occupational therapy intermediate care: A factorial survey.调查职业治疗中级护理中积极冒险障碍对出院决策的影响强度:一项析因调查。
Br J Occup Ther. 2023 Apr;86(4):293-301. doi: 10.1177/03080226221141320. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
2
A randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of decision training on assessors' ability to determine optimal fitness-to-drive recommendations for older or disabled drivers.一项随机对照试验,旨在测试决策训练对评估员确定老年或残疾司机最佳驾驶适应性建议能力的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4.
3
Diagnostic Decision-Making Variability Between Novice and Expert Optometrists for Glaucoma: Comparative Analysis to Inform AI System Design.青光眼诊断中新手验光师与专家验光师决策的变异性:为人工智能系统设计提供信息的比较分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jan 29;13:e63109. doi: 10.2196/63109.
4
Hemispheric activation differences in novice and expert clinicians during clinical decision making.新手和专家临床医生在临床决策过程中的半球激活差异。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Dec;21(5):921-933. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9648-3. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
Pre-discharge home visits: A qualitative exploration of the experience of occupational therapists and multidisciplinary stakeholders.出院前家访:对职业治疗师及多学科利益相关者体验的质性探索
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):249-257. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12561. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
6
Deriving Effective Decision-Making Strategies of Prosthetists: Using Hidden Markov Modeling and Qualitative Analysis to Compare Experts and Novices.从假手制作专家的决策中学习:使用隐马尔可夫模型和定性分析比较专家和新手
Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):188-206. doi: 10.1177/00187208211032860. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
How novice and expert anaesthetists understand expertise in anaesthesia: a qualitative study.新手麻醉师和专家麻醉师如何理解麻醉专业技能:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02180-8.
8
Clinical decision making, risk and occupational therapy.
Health Soc Care Community. 1998 Jan;6(1):47-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1998.00093.x.
9
Eastern perspectives on roles, responsibilities and filial piety: A case study.东方视角下的角色、责任与孝道:一个案例研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):327-345. doi: 10.1177/0969733020934143. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
Occupational therapists' views on using a virtual reality interior design application within the pre-discharge home visit process.职业治疗师对在出院前家访过程中使用虚拟现实室内设计应用程序的看法。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 18;16(12):e283. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3723.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of care transition and hospital discharge.患者转院和出院管理。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Mar;30(3):263-270. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0885-6. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
3
When to use the Bonferroni correction.何时使用邦费罗尼校正。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8. doi: 10.1111/opo.12131. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
4
Risks with older adults in acute care settings: UK occupational therapists' and physiotherapists' perceptions of risks associated with discharge and professional practice.急症护理环境中老年人面临的风险:英国职业治疗师和物理治疗师对与出院及专业实践相关风险的看法。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):381-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00946.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
5
Risk factors for hospital readmissions in elderly patients: a systematic review.老年患者住院再入院的风险因素:系统评价。
QJM. 2011 Aug;104(8):639-51. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr070. Epub 2011 May 10.
6
Community occupational therapists' clinical reasoning: identifying tacit knowledge.社区职业治疗师的临床推理:识别隐性知识。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2010 Dec;57(6):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00875.x. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
7
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
8
Caregiver perspectives on safety in home dementia care.照顾者对家庭痴呆症护理安全的看法。
West J Nurs Res. 2007 Dec;29(8):993-1014. doi: 10.1177/0193945907303098. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
9
Discharge decision-making, enabling occupations, and client-centred practice.出院决策、赋能职业及以客户为中心的实践。
Can J Occup Ther. 2007 Apr;74(2):91-101. doi: 10.1177/000841740707400203.
10
Discharge planning with older adults: toward a negotiated model of decision making.针对老年人的出院计划:迈向协商式决策模式
Can J Occup Ther. 2006 Dec;73(5):303-11. doi: 10.1177/000841740607300507.