Vaitl D, Gruppe H, Kimmel H D
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1985 Jul-Sep;20(3):124-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03003595.
An experiment with 42 human Ss used the transswitching procedure to examine tonic stimulus control of phasic and tonic conditioned vasomotor heart rate, and electrodermal reactions. The conditional stimulus (CSs) were photos of angry and friendly human faces, and the unconditional stimulus (US) was a human scream. In one tonic context (blue light), the CSs were paired with the US, in the other context (yellow light), the CSs were presented unpaired. Following acquisition, an extinction series was run with the US omitted during both tonic contexts. Phasic vasomotor and skin conductance reactions differed in the positive and negative tonic segments (stronger in positive). The skin conductance responses also differed during extinction, but the vasomotor responses did not. Tonic differences (following onset of the tonic stimuli) in unelicited skin conductance response frequency, finger pulse volume, and heart rate were also found, although these developed more slowly than the phasic differences. The finger pulse volume tonic difference was greater in extinction than the skin conductance response frequency. There was no effect of the angry-friendly facial expressions, either directly or in interaction with the transswitching effects. The results were interpreted to mean that the transswitching phenomenon is not limited to one another autonomic effector, but is more generalized across the ANS (sympathetic branch). The absence of influence of the facial expressions indicates the relative weakness of the "preparedness" hypothesis in comparison with more influential contextual factors.
一项针对42名人类受试者的实验采用了转换程序,以检验紧张性刺激对相位性和紧张性条件性血管舒缩性心率以及皮肤电反应的控制。条件刺激(CSs)是愤怒和友好的人脸照片,无条件刺激(US)是人的尖叫声。在一种紧张性情境(蓝光)中,CSs与US配对,在另一种情境(黄光)中,CSs不配对呈现。习得之后,在两种紧张性情境中均省略US进行消退系列实验。相位性血管舒缩反应和皮肤电反应在正向和负向紧张性片段中有所不同(正向更强)。皮肤电反应在消退期间也有所不同,但血管舒缩反应没有。还发现了未诱发的皮肤电反应频率、手指脉搏容积和心率的紧张性差异(在紧张性刺激开始后),尽管这些差异的发展比相位性差异更慢。手指脉搏容积的紧张性差异在消退时比皮肤电反应频率更大。愤怒-友好的面部表情无论是直接影响还是与转换效应相互作用,均无影响。结果被解释为意味着转换现象不仅限于另一种自主效应器,而是在自主神经系统(交感神经分支)中更具普遍性。面部表情没有影响表明与更具影响力的情境因素相比,“准备性”假设相对较弱。