Saghiri Mohammad Ali, Farhadi Maziar, Samadi Elham, Shekarian Mina, Napoli Salvatore, Morgano Steven M
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.
Adjunct Faculty, Department of Endodontics, University of the Pacific, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Odontology. 2025 May 11. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01111-7.
The objective of this study was to assess the effect of selenium substitution on the chemical and mechanical properties of synthesized hydroxyapatite and compare them with natural dentin. Additionally, this study aimed to compare the properties of synthetic and natural hydroxyapatite to determine if laboratory-synthesized hydroxyapatite could serve as a viable substitute for natural hydroxyapatite. Four groups were analyzed: natural dentin (ND-treated and ND-untreated) and synthetic hydroxyapatite (SD-Treated and SD-untreated), each with 10 samples. Samples were exposed to selenium acid for 2, 5, and 10 min, with saline as a control. Selenium content was measured using ICP-MS, and Vickers microhardness testing was performed. Solubility was assessed in 0.1 M butyric acid (pH 4.4) for 24 h at 37 °C with 100% humidity. Selenium concentrations were significantly higher in ND-treated subgroups than in SD-treated subgroups (P < 0.05), mirroring trends observed in surface microhardness. ND-treated groups also exhibited significantly lower solubility compared to other groups. The results suggest a correlation between selenium levels and dentin's mechanical properties. However, synthesized hydroxyapatite may not be an ideal in vitro model for evaluating dentin fortification.
本研究的目的是评估硒替代对合成羟基磷灰石化学和力学性能的影响,并将其与天然牙本质进行比较。此外,本研究旨在比较合成羟基磷灰石和天然羟基磷灰石的性能,以确定实验室合成的羟基磷灰石是否可以作为天然羟基磷灰石的可行替代品。分析了四组:天然牙本质(经处理的ND和未处理的ND)和合成羟基磷灰石(经处理的SD和未处理的SD),每组有10个样本。样本分别暴露于硒酸中2、5和10分钟,以生理盐水作为对照。使用电感耦合等离子体质谱法测量硒含量,并进行维氏显微硬度测试。在37°C、100%湿度条件下,于0.1M丁酸(pH 4.4)中评估溶解度24小时。经处理的ND亚组中的硒浓度显著高于经处理的SD亚组(P < 0.05),这与表面显微硬度观察到的趋势一致。与其他组相比,经处理的ND组的溶解度也显著更低。结果表明硒水平与牙本质力学性能之间存在相关性。然而,合成羟基磷灰石可能不是评估牙本质强化的理想体外模型。