Gan Yaduan, Yang Lin, Liao Jianmei
Department of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 363000 Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 27;26(4):28060. doi: 10.31083/RCM28060. eCollection 2025 Apr.
To assess the precision of artificial intelligence (AI) in aiding the diagnostic process of congenital heart disease (CHD).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for clinical studies published in English up to March 2024. Studies using AI-assisted ultrasound for diagnosing CHD were included. To evaluate the quality of the studies included in the analysis, the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 scale was employed. The overall accuracy of AI-assisted imaging in the diagnosis of CHD was determined using Stata15.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on region and model architecture.
The analysis encompassed a total of 7 studies, yielding 19 datasets. The combined sensitivity was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96), and the specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). The positive likelihood ratio was calculated as 13.0 (95% CI: 7.7-21.9), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13). The diagnostic odds ratio was 171 (95% CI: 62-472). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99). Subgroup analysis found that the ResNet and DenNet architecture models had better diagnostic performance than other models.
AI demonstrates considerable value in aiding the diagnostic process of CHD. However, further prospective studies are required to establish its utility in real-world clinical practice.
CRD42024540525, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=540525.
评估人工智能(AI)在辅助先天性心脏病(CHD)诊断过程中的准确性。
检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,查找截至2024年3月以英文发表的临床研究。纳入使用AI辅助超声诊断CHD的研究。为评估纳入分析的研究质量,采用了诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2量表。使用Stata15.0软件确定AI辅助成像在CHD诊断中的总体准确性。基于地区和模型架构进行亚组分析。
分析共纳入7项研究,产生19个数据集。合并敏感性为0.93(95%置信区间(CI):0.88 - 0.96),特异性为0.93(95%CI:0.88 - 0.96)。阳性似然比计算为13.0(95%CI:7.7 - 21.9),阴性似然比为0.08(95%CI:0.04 - 0.13)。诊断比值比为171(95%CI:62 - 472)。汇总的受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线分析显示曲线下面积为0.98(95%CI:0.96 - 0.99)。亚组分析发现,ResNet和DenNet架构模型的诊断性能优于其他模型。
AI在辅助CHD诊断过程中显示出相当大的价值。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定其在实际临床实践中的效用。
PROSPERO注册编号:CRD42024540525,https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=540525 。