Avci Fatma Gizem, Prasun Tim, Wendisch Volker F
Genetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology and Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
BMC Biotechnol. 2025 May 13;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12896-025-00973-7.
Carbohydrates including sugar acids are commonly used as carbon sources in microbial biotechnology. These sugar acids are themselves desirable and often overlooked targets for biobased production since they find applications in a broad range of industries, examples include food, construction, medical, textile, and polymer industries. Different stages of oxidation for natural sugar acids can be distinguished. Oxidation of the aldehyde group yields aldonic acids, oxidation of the primary hydroxy group leads to uronic acids, and both oxidations combined yield aldaric acids. While the chemical oxidation of sugars to their acid forms often is a one-pot reaction under harsh conditions, their biosynthesis is much more delicate. Bio-based production can involve enzymatic conversion, whole-cell biotransformation, and fermentation. Generally, the in vivo approaches are preferred because they are less resource-intensive than enzymatic conversion. Metabolic engineering plays a crucial role in optimizing microbial strains for efficient sugar acid production. Strategies include pathway engineering to overexpress key enzymes involved in sugar oxidation, deletion of competing pathways to enhance the precursor availability and eliminate the product consumption, cofactor balancing for efficient redox reactions, and transporter engineering to facilitate precursor import or sugar acid export. Synthetic biology tools, such as CRISPR-Cas and dynamic regulatory circuits, have further improved strain development by enabling precise genetic modifications and adaptive control of metabolic fluxes. The usage of plant biomass hydrolysates for bio-based production further adds to the environmental friendliness of the in vivo approaches. This review highlights the different approaches for the production of C5 and C6 sugar acids, their applications, and their catabolism in microbes.
包括糖酸在内的碳水化合物在微生物生物技术中常用作碳源。这些糖酸本身就是理想的且常常被忽视的生物基生产目标,因为它们在广泛的行业中都有应用,例如食品、建筑、医疗、纺织和聚合物行业。天然糖酸的不同氧化阶段是可以区分的。醛基的氧化产生醛糖酸,伯羟基的氧化导致糖醛酸,两种氧化结合则产生糖二酸。虽然糖化学氧化成酸形式通常是在苛刻条件下的一锅反应,但其生物合成要精细得多。生物基生产可涉及酶促转化、全细胞生物转化和发酵。一般来说,体内方法更受青睐,因为它们比酶促转化资源消耗更少。代谢工程在优化微生物菌株以高效生产糖酸方面起着关键作用。策略包括途径工程以过表达参与糖氧化的关键酶、删除竞争途径以提高前体可用性并消除产物消耗、辅因子平衡以实现高效氧化还原反应以及转运体工程以促进前体导入或糖酸输出。合成生物学工具,如CRISPR-Cas和动态调控回路,通过实现精确的基因修饰和代谢通量的适应性控制,进一步改进了菌株开发。将植物生物质水解物用于生物基生产进一步增加了体内方法的环境友好性。本综述重点介绍了生产C5和C6糖酸的不同方法、它们的应用以及它们在微生物中的分解代谢。