• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期以来有偿工作中的性别差异:比较研究的进展与挑战。

Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research.

作者信息

Hipp Lena, Kelley Kristin

机构信息

University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0322871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322871. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0322871
PMID:40367027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12077737/
Abstract

This paper examines gender differences in paid work over time and illustrates the pitfalls encountered by any comparative research that only considers either labor force participation rates or average working hours. To do so, we analyze harmonized survey data from Europe and the United States from 1992 to 2022 (N = 43,283,172) and show that more progress was made in closing gender gaps in labor force participation rates than in working hours. In most countries, women's labor force participation rates increased considerably, but their average working hours decreased, whereas both men's labor force participation rates and average working hours decreased or stagnated (but nonetheless still remained much higher than women's). We show and argue that these countervailing trends in working hours and labor force participation rates make it difficult to paint a coherent picture of cross-national differences in women's and men's paid work and of changes over time. In response, we propose "work volume" as a supplementary or alternative measure for any type of comparative research. Work volume records zero working hours for nonemployed individuals and thus allows straightforward comparisons between women's and men's (or any other groups') involvement in paid work. Using the proposed work volume measure, we show that gender gaps in paid work decreased over time, but that even in 2022, men's involvement in paid work remained considerably higher than women's-with gender gaps being lowest in the Scandinavian and the former Communist countries.

摘要

本文考察了有偿工作中性别差异随时间的变化情况,并说明了任何仅考虑劳动力参与率或平均工作时长的比较研究中所遇到的陷阱。为此,我们分析了1992年至2022年欧洲和美国的协调调查数据(N = 43,283,172),结果表明,在缩小劳动力参与率方面的性别差距上取得的进展比在工作时长方面更多。在大多数国家,女性劳动力参与率大幅上升,但平均工作时长却减少了,而男性的劳动力参与率和平均工作时长则下降或停滞(但仍远高于女性)。我们指出并认为,工作时长和劳动力参与率的这些相反趋势使得难以描绘出男女有偿工作的跨国差异以及随时间变化的连贯图景。作为回应,我们提出“工作量”作为任何类型比较研究的补充或替代指标。工作量将未就业者的工作时长记录为零,从而可以直接比较男女(或任何其他群体)参与有偿工作的情况。使用提议的工作量指标,我们表明有偿工作中的性别差距随时间有所缩小,但即使在2022年,男性参与有偿工作的程度仍远高于女性,斯堪的纳维亚国家和前共产主义国家的性别差距最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/6880f607bf9f/pone.0322871.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/9a03dff61afe/pone.0322871.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/dc940c8d5b45/pone.0322871.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/6880f607bf9f/pone.0322871.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/9a03dff61afe/pone.0322871.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/dc940c8d5b45/pone.0322871.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d768/12077737/6880f607bf9f/pone.0322871.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research.长期以来有偿工作中的性别差异:比较研究的进展与挑战。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0322871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322871. eCollection 2025.
2
Intercountry comparisons of labor force trends and of related developments: an overview.劳动力趋势及相关发展的国家间比较:概述
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S1-32. doi: 10.1086/298074.
3
An analysis of women's labor force participation in France: cross-section estimates and time-series evidence.法国女性劳动力参与情况分析:横截面估计与时间序列证据
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S177-200. doi: 10.1086/298080.
4
Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country Analysis of the World Values Survey.全职就业与健康方面的性别规范和性别平等:对世界价值观调查中97个国家的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:689815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689815. eCollection 2022.
5
Work and family roles of Soviet women: historical trends and cross-section analysis.苏联女性的工作与家庭角色:历史趋势与横断面分析
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S328-54. doi: 10.1086/298088.
6
Trends in female labor force participation in Sweden.瑞典女性劳动力参与率的趋势。
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S256-74. doi: 10.1086/298084.
7
Why are more women working in Britain?为什么在英国有更多女性参加工作?
J Labor Econ. 1985 Jan;3(1 Pt 2):S147-76. doi: 10.1086/298079.
8
Retirement patterns and bridge jobs in the 1990s.20世纪90年代的退休模式与过渡性工作
EBRI Issue Brief. 1999 Feb(206):1-22.
9
Impact of the input of women's working hours on household non-economic welfare.女性工作时长投入对家庭非经济福利的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3523. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21063-x.
10
The labor market experience of female migrants: the case of temporary Mexican migration to the U.S.女性移民的劳动力市场经历:以墨西哥临时移民到美国为例
Int Migr Rev. 1984 Winter;18(4 Special Issue):1120-43.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments.性别构成预测性别偏见:雇佣歧视审计实验的元分析。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 5;9(18):eade7979. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7979.
2
The gendered pandemic: The implications of COVID-19 for work and family.性别化的大流行:新冠疫情对工作与家庭的影响
Sociol Compass. 2021 Jun;15(6):e12881. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12881. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
National Family Policies and Mothers' Employment: How Earnings Inequality Shapes Policy Effects Across and Within Countries.
国家家庭政策与母亲就业:收入不平等如何塑造国家间及国家内部的政策效应。
Am Sociol Rev. 2020 Jun;85(3):381-416. doi: 10.1177/0003122420922505. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours.新冠疫情与工作时长的性别差距
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jan;28(Suppl 1):101-112. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12506. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Gender Segregation, Occupational Sorting, and Growth of Wage Disparities Between Women.性别隔离、职业分类与女性间工资差距扩大
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):1063-1088. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00887-3.
6
Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled.美国在性别平等方面的进展已经放缓或停滞。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):6990-6997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918891117.
7
Caregiving time costs and trade-offs: Gender differences in Sweden, the UK, and Canada.护理时间成本与权衡:瑞典、英国和加拿大的性别差异。
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Oct 17;9:100501. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100501. eCollection 2019 Dec.