• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别构成预测性别偏见:雇佣歧视审计实验的元分析。

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments.

机构信息

Centre for the Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination (CEPDISC), Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2023 May 5;9(18):eade7979. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7979.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.ade7979
PMID:37146136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11326032/
Abstract

Since 1983, more than 70 employment audit experiments, carried out in more than 26 countries across five continents, have randomized the gender of fictitious applicants to measure the extent of hiring discrimination on the basis of gender. The results are mixed: Some studies find discrimination against men, and others find discrimination against women. We reconcile these heterogeneous findings through a "meta-reanalysis" of the average effects of being described as a woman (versus a man), conditional on occupation. We find a strongly positive gender gradient. In (relatively better paying) occupations dominated by men, the effect of being a woman is negative, while in the (relatively lower paying) occupations dominated by women, the effect is positive. In this way, heterogeneous employment discrimination on the basis of gender preserves status quo gender distributions and earnings gaps. These patterns hold among both minority and majority status applicants.

摘要

自 1983 年以来,在五大洲的 26 个以上国家进行了 70 多次就业审计实验,这些实验通过随机分配虚构申请人的性别来衡量基于性别的雇佣歧视程度。结果喜忧参半:一些研究发现存在对男性的歧视,而另一些研究则发现对女性的歧视。我们通过对描述为女性(相对于男性)的平均效应进行“元分析”,根据职业条件,调和了这些异构的发现。我们发现存在强烈的性别梯度。在(相对薪酬较高)以男性为主导的职业中,女性的效应是负面的,而在(相对薪酬较低)以女性为主导的职业中,效应是正面的。这样,基于性别的异质雇佣歧视就保持了现状性别分布和收入差距。这些模式在少数族裔和多数族裔申请人中都存在。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/25a200101b83/sciadv.ade7979-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/03d810f6eb04/sciadv.ade7979-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/c5e6e40ce289/sciadv.ade7979-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/e3e9417cdd26/sciadv.ade7979-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/55a2ed39fcdc/sciadv.ade7979-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/25a200101b83/sciadv.ade7979-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/03d810f6eb04/sciadv.ade7979-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/c5e6e40ce289/sciadv.ade7979-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/e3e9417cdd26/sciadv.ade7979-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/55a2ed39fcdc/sciadv.ade7979-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/003d/11326032/25a200101b83/sciadv.ade7979-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments.性别构成预测性别偏见:雇佣歧视审计实验的元分析。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 5;9(18):eade7979. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7979.
2
Monitoring hiring discrimination through online recruitment platforms.通过在线招聘平台监测招聘歧视。
Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7843):572-576. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03136-0. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Gender discrimination in hiring: An experimental reexamination of the Swedish case.招聘中的性别歧视:对瑞典案例的实验性再检验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0245513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245513. eCollection 2021.
4
The role of occupational attributes in gender earnings inequality, 1970-2010.1970 - 2010年职业属性在性别收入不平等中的作用
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:122-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Gender, race & the veteran wage gap.性别、种族与退伍军人工资差距。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jan;61:11-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
6
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.探索学术科学六个关键领域的性别偏见:对抗性合作。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Jul;24(1):15-73. doi: 10.1177/15291006231163179. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
The persistence of pay inequality: The gender pay gap in an anonymous online labor market.薪酬不平等的持续存在:匿名在线劳动力市场中的性别薪酬差距。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 21;15(2):e0229383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229383. eCollection 2020.
8
Obesity and hiring discrimination.肥胖与雇佣歧视。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100850. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100850. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Prototypes and same-gender bias in perceptions of hiring discrimination.对招聘歧视感知中的原型和同性别偏见。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(3):285-297. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1341374. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
10
Gender pay gap and employment sector: sources of earnings disparities in the United States, 1970-2010.性别薪酬差距与就业部门:1970 - 2010年美国收入差距的来源
Demography. 2014 Oct;51(5):1597-618. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0320-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic inequality in mental health disorders: A cross-sectional study from the Tehran University of Medical Sciences employees' cohort study.心理健康障碍中的社会经济不平等:来自德黑兰医科大学员工队列研究的横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02192-8.
2
Gender differences in paid work over time: Developments and challenges in comparative research.长期以来有偿工作中的性别差异:比较研究的进展与挑战。
PLoS One. 2025 May 14;20(5):e0322871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322871. eCollection 2025.
3
Shifting landscapes of gender equity in oncology journals: a decade of authorship trends.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Antibias Interventions (Need Not) Fail.为何反偏见干预(未必)会失败。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;17(5):1381-1403. doi: 10.1177/17456916211057565. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Gender discrimination in hiring: An experimental reexamination of the Swedish case.招聘中的性别歧视:对瑞典案例的实验性再检验。
肿瘤学杂志中性别平等格局的变化:十年作者趋势
Mol Cancer. 2025 Mar 17;24(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02286-x.
4
Workplace Injury and Death: A National Overview of Changing Trends by Sex, United States 1998-2022.工作场所伤亡:1998 - 2022年美国按性别划分的变化趋势全国概述
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Feb;68(2):194-201. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23687. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
5
Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments.感知的温暖和能力可以预测北美劳动力市场实验的回调率。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0304723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304723. eCollection 2024.
6
Bias of AI-generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models.人工智能生成内容的偏差:对大语言模型生成的新闻的审视
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 4;14(1):5224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55686-2.
7
Gender equity in hiring: examining the effectiveness of a personality-based algorithm.招聘中的性别平等:审视基于个性的算法的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 15;14:1219865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219865. eCollection 2023.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0245513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245513. eCollection 2021.
4
Declaring and Diagnosing Research Designs.声明与诊断研究设计。
Am Polit Sci Rev. 2019 Aug;113(3):838-859. doi: 10.1017/s0003055419000194. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists-Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening.在某些职业中,女性已经有了相当的占比,但性别偏见依然存在——那些认为不存在性别偏见的人使其延续下去。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 26;6(26):eaba7814. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7814. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled.美国在性别平等方面的进展已经放缓或停滞。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):6990-6997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918891117.
7
Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe gender bias exists.当委员会认为不存在性别偏见时,带有隐性偏见的委员会会较少地提拔女性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Nov;3(11):1171-1179. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0686-3. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Immigrants and Italian labor market: statistical or taste-based discrimination?移民与意大利劳动力市场:是统计性歧视还是基于偏好的歧视?
Genus. 2018;74(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41118-018-0030-1. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
A Gender Bias Habit-Breaking Intervention Led to Increased Hiring of Female Faculty in STEMM Departments.一项打破性别偏见习惯的干预措施使得 STEMM 系聘用的女性教员有所增加。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017 Nov;73:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States.美国大学的专业领域与终身收入
Sociol Educ. 2015 Oct;88(4):320-339. doi: 10.1177/0038040715602132. Epub 2015 Sep 4.