Suppr超能文献

化学发光免疫分析法与液相色谱-串联质谱法测定犬唾液中皮质醇的比较。

Comparison of the determination of cortisol in canine saliva by chemiluminescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

作者信息

Schroers Maike, Zablotski Yuri, Meyer-Lindenberg Andrea

机构信息

Clinic of Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Veterinary Faculty, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2025 May 14:10406387251327413. doi: 10.1177/10406387251327413.

Abstract

We determined saliva cortisol concentrations (SCCs) in samples from 36 dogs using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) before and after a 10-min veterinary visit. The median cortisol concentration of the 77 samples analyzed with CLIA was 1.34 nmol/L, and the concentration of samples analyzed with LC-MS/MS was 1.30 nmol/L. With an intercept (a) of -0.06 (95% CI: -0.16 to 0.02) and a slope (b) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97) the Passing-Bablok regression revealed that there were no significant systematic and proportional differences between the 2 methods. In the Bland-Altman analysis, the bias was 0.08 nmol/L (95% CI: -0.38 to 0.54 nmol/L) between the 2 methods. Comparing the hormone levels in the saliva of 36 dogs before and after a veterinary visit, the CLIA method had a mean difference of 0.03 nmol/L (95% CI: -1.72 to 4.75 nmol/L;  = 0.35) and the LC-MS/MS method a mean difference of 0.12 nmol/L (95% CI 95%: -2.43 to 4.40 nmol/L;  = 0.62). Comparison of cortisol changes before ( = 0.86) and after ( 0.79) the veterinary visit revealed no differences in using either the CLIA or LC-MS/MS methods. There was also no difference in the assessment of hormone increase or decrease between CLIA ( = 0.72) and LC-MS/MS ( = 0.17). Overall, the measurement of SCC in dogs by either CLIA or LC-MS/MS provided comparable results.

摘要

我们在36只犬的样本中,于10分钟的兽医诊疗前后,使用化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)和液相色谱 - 串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定唾液皮质醇浓度(SCC)。用CLIA分析的77个样本的皮质醇浓度中位数为1.34 nmol/L,用LC-MS/MS分析的样本浓度为1.30 nmol/L。通过Passing-Bablok回归分析,截距(a)为 -0.06(95%可信区间:-0.16至0.02),斜率(b)为0.97(95%可信区间:0.90 - 0.97),结果显示两种方法之间无显著的系统差异和比例差异。在Bland-Altman分析中,两种方法之间的偏差为0.08 nmol/L(95%可信区间:-0.38至0.54 nmol/L)。比较36只犬在兽医诊疗前后唾液中的激素水平,CLIA法的平均差异为0.03 nmol/L(95%可信区间:-1.72至4.75 nmol/L;P = 0.35),LC-MS/MS法的平均差异为0.12 nmol/L(95%可信区间:-2.43至4.40 nmol/L;P = 0.62)。比较兽医诊疗前(P = 0.86)和诊疗后(P = 0.79)皮质醇的变化,结果显示使用CLIA或LC-MS/MS方法均无差异。在评估激素升高或降低方面,CLIA(P = 0.72)和LC-MS/MS(P = 0.17)之间也无差异。总体而言,通过CLIA或LC-MS/MS测量犬的SCC可提供可比的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c274/12081392/6dd587f11e0e/10.1177_10406387251327413-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验