Gal Dana B, Buddhe Sujatha, Salles Arghavan, Co-Vu Jennifer G, Kipps Alaina K
Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101805. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101805. Epub 2025 May 14.
Representation of women at successive career stages decreases within academic pediatric cardiology. Despite equal gender representation among pediatric cardiology trainees and board-eligible pediatric cardiologists, only 13% of U.S. programs have female division chiefs. There is little insight into what drives success among women who, despite these odds, attain the highest levels of academic success and leadership.
The aim of this study was to describe perspectives of women pediatric cardiology chiefs.
This was a qualitative study using semistructured virtually conducted interviews. All current and former female chiefs of North American academic pediatric cardiology divisions were invited to participate. We completed inductive thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.
Among eligible individuals, 16 of 20 agreed to participate. While 9 (56%) had worked under female chairs of pediatrics, only 4 (25%) previously had a female division chief. All held formal leadership roles before being chief. All participated in leadership training. Most were married (94%) and had children (81%). Three major findings were identified: "I didn't set out to be chief," which included minor findings of the need for external validation, self-doubt, and late achievement of chief-level leadership; leveraging and discarding stereotypically feminine qualities; and solutions.
Women who rise to the highest leadership ranks in pediatric cardiology have shared perspectives. These perspectives are influenced by gender norms and inform ideas to address attrition of women in academic pediatric cardiology. Participants emphasized a need for increased awareness of this issue in pediatric cardiology, the importance of sponsorship, access to leadership training/coaching, and workplace and schedule flexibility as potential solutions.
在学术性小儿心脏病学领域,处于连续职业阶段的女性比例呈下降趋势。尽管小儿心脏病学实习生和具备委员会资格的小儿心脏病专家中男女比例相当,但在美国,只有13%的项目的科室主任为女性。对于那些尽管面临诸多不利因素却仍取得最高学术成就和领导力的女性,人们对她们成功的驱动因素了解甚少。
本研究旨在描述女性小儿心脏病学主任的观点。
这是一项采用半结构化虚拟访谈的定性研究。邀请了北美所有现任和前任学术性小儿心脏病学科室的女性主任参与。我们对访谈转录内容进行了归纳主题分析。
在符合条件的人员中,20人中有16人同意参与。虽然9人(56%)曾在女性儿科主任手下工作,但之前只有4人(25%)有女性科室主任。所有人在担任主任之前都担任过正式领导职务。所有人都参加过领导力培训。大多数人已婚(94%)且育有子女(81%)。确定了三个主要发现:“我并非一开始就想成为主任”,其中包括一些次要发现,如需要外部认可、自我怀疑以及较晚获得主任级别的领导地位;利用和摒弃传统女性特质;以及解决办法。
在小儿心脏病学领域升至最高领导职位的女性有着共同的观点。这些观点受到性别规范的影响,并为解决学术性小儿心脏病学领域女性流失问题提供了思路。参与者强调小儿心脏病学领域需要提高对这一问题的认识,赞助的重要性,获得领导力培训/辅导的机会,以及工作场所和日程安排的灵活性作为潜在解决方案。