• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy for Identifying Sessile Serrated Polyps and Adenomas During Routine Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.在常规结直肠癌筛查中使用Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查识别无蒂锯齿状息肉和腺瘤:一项回顾性队列研究
JGH Open. 2025 May 14;9(5):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70173. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查显著提高了退伍军人中无蒂锯齿状腺瘤的检出率。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Aug;8(4):636-642. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.03.07.
3
Endoscopic cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study-DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT).内镜辅助套扎圈结肠切除术与帽辅助结肠切除术在腺瘤检测中的比较:随机串联研究——套扎圈-帽检测试验(DETECT)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Apr;91(4):894-904.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
4
Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.Endocuff Vision 提高腺瘤检出率:ADENOMA 随机对照试验。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):280-288. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
5
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.内镜辅助结肠镜检查与帽辅助结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec;35(12):2066-2073. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15155. Epub 2020 Jul 19.
6
Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Endocuff 结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤的检出率:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):438-445. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310097. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
7
Efficacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps.Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的疗效。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Apr;6(4):E425-E431. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-101142. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
8
Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy for surveillance of serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.经内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的疗效及安全性的 Meta 分析
Endoscopy. 2019 Jul;51(7):637-645. doi: 10.1055/a-0925-4956. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
9
The impact of EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopy on the polyp detection rate: A cross-over randomized back-to-back study.EndoCuff 辅助结肠镜检查对息肉检出率的影响:一项交叉随机背靠背研究。
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;25(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.11.007. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
10
Endocuff Vision Reduces Inspection Time Without Decreasing Lesion Detection: A Clinical Randomized Trial.Endocuff Vision 可减少检查时间而不降低病变检出率:一项临床随机试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jan;18(1):158-162.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of add-on devices with projections on screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.带突起附加装置对结肠镜筛查的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep-Oct;36(5):533-540. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0820. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
2
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
3
The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.内镜设备Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™对结肠镜检查质量标准的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):573-585. doi: 10.1111/codi.16444. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Endocuff 辅助与标准结肠镜检查提高腺瘤检出率的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;27(2):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02642-9. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
5
Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.锯齿状息肉检测与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌间隔期风险:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;7(8):747-754. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00090-5. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查的最佳策略。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):474-493. doi: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
7
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021.ACG 临床指南:结直肠癌筛查 2021 年版。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 1;116(3):458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.
8
Comparing endoscopic interventions to improve serrated adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较内镜干预措施以提高结肠镜检查期间锯齿状腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;32(10):1284-1292. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001844.
9
Increased Sessile Serrated Adenoma Detection Rate With Mechanical New Technology Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.采用机械新技术设备提高静止性锯齿状腺瘤检出率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 1;55(4):335-342. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001363.
10
Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.结肠镜检查附件在结肠镜检查中检测癌前病变的应用:文献综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 7;24(37):4243-4253. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i37.4243.

在常规结直肠癌筛查中使用Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查识别无蒂锯齿状息肉和腺瘤:一项回顾性队列研究

Endocuff-Assisted Colonoscopy for Identifying Sessile Serrated Polyps and Adenomas During Routine Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Chaudhary Ammad Javaid, Faisal Muhammad Saad, Sohail Abdullah, Baldwin Hope, Harris Kevin, Shahzil Muhammad, Faisal Muhammad Salman, Toiv Avi, Mullins Keith, Suresh Suraj

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan USA.

Department of Internal Medicine University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2025 May 14;9(5):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70173. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70173
PMID:40375857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12078195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polyps located in less accessible areas of the colon, such as inner curves of flexures, are often difficult to visualize. Colonoscope attachments such as the Endocuff have been developed to improve the visualization of these polyps. We aimed to assess the utility of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) in the detection of tubular adenomas and sessile serrated polyps (SSP) compared to conventional colonoscopy during routine colorectal cancer screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent colorectal cancer screening with either conventional colonoscopy or EAC between November 2022 and March 2023. The primary outcomes were SSP and tubular adenoma detection rates. Secondary outcomes included total procedure time, cecal intubation time, and ileal intubation rates.

RESULTS

Of the 435 patients included, 189 (43%) underwent EAC, and 246 (57%) underwent conventional colonoscopy. The mean ± standard deviation number of polyps detected was 1.7 ± 2.2, the mean procedure time was 18.7 ± 7.5 min, and the mean cecal intubation time was 4.4 ± 3.3 min, with no significant differences between groups. A smaller proportion of patients in the EAC group had successful ileal intubation (14% vs. 55%;  < 0.01). The tubular adenoma detection rate was similar between EAC and conventional colonoscopy (41% vs. 39%;  = 0.70), but the SSP detection rate was significantly higher with EAC (16% vs. 8.5%;  < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

EAC may enhance the detection of difficult-to-visualize SSPs during screening colonoscopies without affecting overall procedure time. However, physicians should consider the examination indication when selecting EAC, as ileal intubation may be more challenging.

摘要

背景与目的

位于结肠较难触及区域(如弯曲部内缘)的息肉通常难以可视化。已开发出如Endocuff等结肠镜附件以改善这些息肉的可视化效果。我们旨在评估在常规结直肠癌筛查期间,与传统结肠镜检查相比,Endocuff辅助结肠镜检查(EAC)在检测管状腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状息肉(SSP)方面的效用。

患者与方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2022年11月至2023年3月期间接受传统结肠镜检查或EAC进行结直肠癌筛查的患者。主要结局为SSP和管状腺瘤的检出率。次要结局包括总操作时间、盲肠插管时间和回肠插管率。

结果

在纳入的435例患者中,189例(43%)接受了EAC,246例(57%)接受了传统结肠镜检查。检测到的息肉平均数量±标准差为1.7±2.2个,平均操作时间为18.7±7.5分钟,平均盲肠插管时间为4.4±3.3分钟,两组之间无显著差异。EAC组成功进行回肠插管的患者比例较小(14%对55%;P<0.01)。EAC和传统结肠镜检查的管状腺瘤检出率相似(41%对39%;P = 0.70),但EAC的SSP检出率显著更高(16%对8.5%;P<0.01)。

结论

EAC可能会在不影响总体操作时间的情况下,提高筛查结肠镜检查中难以可视化的SSP的检出率。然而,医生在选择EAC时应考虑检查指征,因为回肠插管可能更具挑战性。