Zhao Qiuling, He Yimin, Nian Zilin, Huang Yongjian, Huang Ruyi, Lai Lijun, Yang Lin
Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 May 1;16:1404389. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1404389. eCollection 2025.
Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (camr-rivo) has been shown to significantly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the CARES-310 trial. However, the cost-utility of this treatment remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the cost-utility of camr-rivo versus sorafenib as a first-line systemic therapy for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC from the perspectives of the Chinese healthcare system and the United States (US) payers.
Based on the CARES-310 trial, a partitioned survival model was constructed to estimate economic costs and health outcomes over a 10-year lifetime horizon. Drug costs were obtained from the public database, Red Book, and relevant literature. Health utility values were derived from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was $36,627.25/QALY in China and $150,000.00/QALY in the United States.
Camr-rivo yielded an additional 0.34 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) compared to sorafenib for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC. The incremental costs in China and the United States were $4,762.10 and $92,700.49, respectively, and the incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were $14,174.40/QALY and $272,852.59/QALY, respectively. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of rivoceranib and camrelizumab had the greatest impact on the ICUR in China and the United States. Scenario analyses showed that a price reduction of approximately 30% for camrelizumab and rivoceranib could make camr-rivo a cost-utility option in the United States.
At the set WTP threshold, camr-rivo is a cost-utility treatment strategy compared to sorafenib as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC in China but not in the United States.
在CARES - 310试验中,卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞沃替尼(卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼)已被证明可显著提高不可切除或晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的总生存期(OS)。然而,这种治疗的成本效益仍不明确。因此,本研究从中美两国医疗体系的角度,评估了卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼与索拉非尼作为不可切除或晚期HCC患者一线全身治疗的成本效益。
基于CARES - 310试验,构建了一个分段生存模型,以估计10年生存期内的经济成本和健康结果。药物成本从公共数据库《红皮书》及相关文献中获取。健康效用值来自文献。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析。中国的支付意愿(WTP)阈值为每质量调整生命年(QALY)36,627.25美元,美国为每QALY 150,000.00美元。
对于不可切除或晚期HCC患者,与索拉非尼相比,卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼可额外增加0.34个质量调整生命年(QALY)。中国和美国的增量成本分别为4,762.10美元和92,700.49美元,增量成本效用比(ICUR)分别为每QALY 14,174.40美元和每QALY 272,852.59美元。敏感性分析表明,瑞沃替尼和卡瑞利珠单抗的成本对中国和美国的ICUR影响最大。情景分析表明,卡瑞利珠单抗和瑞沃替尼价格降低约30%可使卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼在美国成为具有成本效益的选择。
在设定的WTP阈值下,作为不可切除或晚期HCC患者的一线治疗,与索拉非尼相比,卡瑞利珠单抗-瑞沃替尼在中国是一种具有成本效益的治疗策略,但在美国并非如此。