Suppr超能文献

免疫治疗或靶向治疗作为不可切除肝细胞癌的一线策略:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。

Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan,  China.

National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan,  China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1103055. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1103055. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The existence of many phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) puzzle doctors and patients in choosing the most effective treatment strategies. We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategy for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

The included clinical trials were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science databases, in which immunotherapy or targeted therapy was regarded as the first-line treatment for unresectable HCC, published in English between January 1, 2010, and September 20, 2022. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the Chinese payer's perspective. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the ranks of different treatments using P-score, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated by NMA. Total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-benefit ratio (ICER) were estimated from 15-year Markov models developed by CEA.

RESULTS

We identified 2,825 records, including 11,796 patients, from 15 RCTs. The NMA revealed that sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.75; P = 0.96) and camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.66; P = 0.94) could lead to great improvements in OS and PFS compared with sorafenib-related survival. The CEA indicated that tislelizumab increased by 0.220 QALYs (0.312 LYs) and decreased by $1,938 compared with sorafenib, which yielded ICERs of -$8,809/QALY (-$2,612/LY). Sensitivity analysis showed that the model was stable.

CONCLUSION

Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar and camrelizumab plus rivoceranib significantly prolonged OS and PFS, respectively. Further considering the pharmacoeconomics factors, tislelizumab is the most cost-effective first-line treatment strategy for unresectable HCC in China.

摘要

简介

存在许多针对不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)一线治疗的 III 期随机对照试验(RCT),这让医生和患者在选择最有效的治疗策略时感到困惑。我们旨在评估免疫治疗或靶向治疗作为不可切除 HCC 的一线策略的疗效、安全性和成本效益。

方法

从 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库中检索纳入的临床试验,其中免疫治疗或靶向治疗被视为不可切除 HCC 的一线治疗,发表于 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 20 日的英文文献。我们从中国支付者的角度进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)和成本效益分析(CEA)。通过 NMA 评估总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、使用 P 评分的不同治疗方法的排名以及不良事件(AE)。通过 CEA 开发的 15 年 Markov 模型估计总费用、生命年(LY)、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

我们从 15 项 RCT 中确定了 2825 条记录,包括 11796 名患者。NMA 显示,信迪利单抗联合贝伐珠单抗生物类似物(HR,0.57;95%CI,0.43 至 0.75;P=0.96)和卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼(HR,0.56;95%CI,0.41 至 0.66;P=0.94)与索拉非尼相关生存相比,可显著改善 OS 和 PFS。CEA 表明替雷利珠单抗与索拉非尼相比增加了 0.220 QALY(0.312 LY),并降低了 1938 美元,ICER 为-8809 美元/QALY(-2612 美元/LY)。敏感性分析表明模型稳定。

结论

信迪利单抗联合贝伐珠单抗生物类似物和卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼分别显著延长了 OS 和 PFS。进一步考虑药物经济学因素,替雷利珠单抗是中国不可切除 HCC 最具成本效益的一线治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1f/9874298/cbf910bcb994/fimmu-13-1103055-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验