Riccio Federica, Klarenbeek Bastiaan R, Fujiwara Hitoshi, Seto Yasuyuki, Cuesta Miguel A
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, 1st Surgical Clinic, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dis Esophagus. 2025 May 3;38(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaf035.
Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged over open surgery, showing important advantages on the short time and comparable oncological outcomes, though concerns persist about pulmonary complications. The avoidance of the thoracic route has shown lower pulmonary complication rates compared to traditional approaches. Since 2015, a novel technique was introduced combining single port transcervical and transhiatal laparoscopic mediastinal dissection for esophageal resection. The procedure is nowadays expanding, following the IDEAL framework stage 2b an international collaborative group has been created to register, standardize the procedure, selection of patients, and assess the outcome, highlighting the need for ongoing discussion and research. A broad questionnaire was sent to all the groups worldwide known to us performing this procedure. Results of this questionnaire are the goal of this manuscript, aiming to present the procedure, experiences, problems, and lessons learned with this procedure. The thirteen respondents currently practicing this technique were categorized based on case volume and experience. Results show varied surgical indications, with higher-volume centers displaying less selectivity. Slightly different surgical approaches were reported, with the left transcervical and abdominal transhiatal dissection being the basis techniques. Surgeons reported high rates of R0 resection and lymph node harvested, low rates of pulmonary complications and anastomotic leaks, but high rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries. The collaborative group aims to align techniques, share experiences, and standardize procedures. Despite concerns about recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, not different from other total mediastinal lymphadenectomy techniques, the procedure shows promise in reducing pulmonary complications, marking a crucial step toward global acceptance. Future efforts will focus on standardization, comparative studies, and training protocols.
与开放手术相比,微创食管切除术已逐渐兴起,在缩短手术时间方面显示出重要优势,肿瘤学结局相当,不过对肺部并发症的担忧依然存在。与传统手术方式相比,避免经胸入路已显示出较低的肺部并发症发生率。自2015年以来,一种新技术被引入,该技术结合单孔经颈和经裂孔腹腔镜纵隔淋巴结清扫术进行食管切除术。如今该手术正在推广,遵循 IDEAL 框架2b阶段,一个国际协作组已成立,旨在对该手术、患者选择进行登记、标准化,并评估结果,这凸显了持续讨论和研究的必要性。一份广泛的问卷已发送给我们所知的全球所有开展该手术的团队。这份问卷的结果是本手稿的目标,旨在介绍该手术、经验、问题以及从该手术中学到的教训。根据病例数量和经验,对目前实施该技术的13位受访者进行了分类。结果显示手术适应证各不相同,病例数量较多的中心选择性较低。报告的手术方式略有不同,以左侧经颈和经腹裂孔淋巴结清扫术为基本术式。外科医生报告了较高的R0切除率和淋巴结清扫率、较低的肺部并发症和吻合口漏发生率,但喉返神经损伤发生率较高。协作组旨在统一技术、分享经验并规范手术操作。尽管对喉返神经损伤存在担忧,但与其他全纵隔淋巴结清扫术技术并无差异,该手术在降低肺部并发症方面显示出前景,标志着朝着全球认可迈出了关键一步。未来的努力将集中在标准化、比较研究和培训方案上。