Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247473. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7473.
Considerable racial segregation exists in US hospitals that cannot be explained by where patients live. Approaches to measuring such segregation are limited.
To measure how and where sorting of older Black patients to different hospitals occurs within the same health care market.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used 2019 Medicare claims data linked to geographic data. Hospital zip code markets were based on driving time. The local hospital segregation (LHS) index was defined as the difference between the racial composition of a hospital's admissions and the racial composition of the hospital's market. Assessed admissions were among US Medicare fee-for-service enrollees aged 65 or older living in the 48 contiguous states with at least 1 hospitalization in 2019 at a hospital with at least 200 hospitalizations. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to January 2024.
Degree of residential segregation, ownership status, region, teaching hospital designation, and disproportionate share hospital status.
The LHS index by hospital and a regional LHS index by hospital referral region.
In the sample of 1991 acute care hospitals, 4 870 252 patients (mean [SD] age, 77.7 [8.3] years; 2 822 006 [56.0%] female) were treated, including 11 435 American Indian or Alaska Native patients (0.2%), 129 376 Asian patients (2.6%), 597 564 Black patients (11.9%), 395 397 Hispanic patients (7.8), and 3 818 371 White patients (75.8%). In the sample, half of hospitalizations among Black patients occurred at 235 hospitals (11.8% of all hospitals); 878 hospitals (34.4%) exhibited a negative LHS score (ie, admitted fewer Black patients relative to their market area) while 1113 hospitals (45.0%) exhibited a positive LHS (ie, admitted more Black patients relative to their market area); of all hospitals, 79.4% exhibited racial admission patterns significantly different from their market. Hospital-level LHS was positively associated with government hospital status (coefficient, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.38), while New York, New York; Chicago, Illinois; and Detroit, Michigan, hospital referral regions exhibited the highest regional LHS measures, with hospital referral region LHS scores of 0.12, 0.16, and 0.21, respectively.
In this cross-sectional study, a novel measure of LHS was developed to quantify the extent to which hospitals were admitting a representative proportion of Black patients relative to their market areas. A better understanding of hospital choice within neighborhoods would help to reduce racial inequities in health outcomes.
美国医院存在明显的种族隔离现象,这种现象不能用患者居住的地方来解释。衡量这种隔离的方法有限。
测量在同一医疗市场内,黑人老年患者在不同医院之间是如何以及为何被分配的。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性的横截面研究使用了 2019 年医疗保险索赔数据与地理数据相关联。医院邮政编码市场基于驾驶时间。当地医院隔离(LHS)指数定义为医院入院患者的种族构成与医院市场种族构成之间的差异。评估的入院患者是在美国医疗保险费制计划中年龄在 65 岁或以上的患者,他们居住在 48 个州的任意一个州,在 2019 年至少在一家有 200 次以上住院记录的医院中住院一次。数据于 2022 年 11 月至 2024 年 1 月进行分析。
居住隔离程度、所有权状况、地区、教学医院指定和不成比例的医院份额。
医院的 LHS 指数和医院转诊地区的区域 LHS 指数。
在纳入的 1991 家急性护理医院中,有 1991 家医院对 4870252 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,77.7[8.3]岁;2822006[56.0%]为女性)进行了治疗,其中包括 11435 名美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民患者(0.2%)、129376 名亚洲患者(2.6%)、597564 名黑人患者(11.9%)、395397 名西班牙裔患者(7.8%)和 3818371 名白人患者(75.8%)。在该样本中,黑人患者的一半住院治疗发生在 235 家医院(占所有医院的 11.8%);878 家医院(34.4%)表现出负 LHS 评分(即,相对于其市场区域,接收的黑人患者较少),而 1113 家医院(45.0%)表现出正 LHS(即,相对于其市场区域,接收的黑人患者较多);在所有医院中,79.4%的医院的入院模式与市场明显不同。医院层面的 LHS 与政府医院地位呈正相关(系数,0.24;95%CI,0.10 至 0.38),而纽约州、纽约市;伊利诺伊州、芝加哥;密歇根州、底特律的医院转诊地区表现出最高的区域 LHS 衡量标准,医院转诊地区的 LHS 评分分别为 0.12、0.16 和 0.21。
在这项横断面研究中,开发了一种新的 LHS 衡量标准,以量化医院在多大程度上相对于其市场区域接纳了代表性比例的黑人患者。更好地了解邻里之间的医院选择将有助于减少健康结果方面的种族不平等。