• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Medical Students' Perspectives on Physical, Online, and Hybrid Learning Modalities: A Mixed Methods Study From a Medical School in Mauritius.医学生对线下、线上及混合式学习模式的看法:来自毛里求斯一所医学院的混合方法研究
Cureus. 2025 Apr 22;17(4):e82765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82765. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
The Association Between Distance Learning, Stress Level, and Perceived Quality of Education in Medical Students After Transitioning to a Fully Online Platform.向完全在线平台过渡后,医学生的远程学习、压力水平与感知教育质量之间的关联
Cureus. 2022 Apr 12;14(4):e24071. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24071. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Navigating undergraduate medical education: a comparative evaluation of a fully online versus a hybrid model.本科医学教育的探索:对完全在线模式与混合模式的比较评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05865-6.
4
Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.线上、面对面还是混合式学习?新冠疫情期间教师与医学生的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;9:791352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352. eCollection 2022.
5
[Chances and challenges of increasing digitalization of teaching in the discipline anesthesiology from the perspective of students].从学生视角看麻醉学专业教学日益数字化的机遇与挑战
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Sep;71(9):689-696. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01102-1. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Promoting Pedagogical Resilience: Unveiling the Efficacy of Synchronous Online Lectures Compared to Traditional Methods From the Students' Vantage Point Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.提升教学适应力:从学生视角揭示在新冠疫情期间同步在线讲座与传统方法相比的效果
Cureus. 2024 Sep 1;16(9):e68391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68391. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Medical Students' Perceptions Towards Online Teaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.新冠疫情期间医学生对在线教学的认知:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Apr 23;14:407-419. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S396912. eCollection 2023.
8
University students' preferences of learning modes post COVID-19-associated lockdowns: In-person, online, and blended.新冠疫情封锁后大学生对学习模式的偏好:面授、在线和混合式。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0296670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296670. eCollection 2024.
9
Effectiveness of an "online + in-person" hybrid model for an undergraduate molecular biology lab during COVID-19.COVID-19期间本科分子生物学实验室“线上+线下”混合模式的有效性
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2023 Mar;51(2):155-163. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21704. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Medical Education during the Last Year of Medical School: A Class Survey.新冠疫情如何影响医学院校最后一年的医学教育:一项班级调查
Life (Basel). 2021 Mar 30;11(4):294. doi: 10.3390/life11040294.

本文引用的文献

1
Integration of Virtual and Traditional Medical Education: Scholarship Pivots from the COVID-19 Pandemic.虚拟医学教育与传统医学教育的融合:源于新冠疫情的学术转向
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 14;12(6):e5910. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005910. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The impact of COVID-19 on medical students.COVID-19 对医学生的影响。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):Doc10. doi: 10.3205/zma001665. eCollection 2024.
3
Learning Outcomes in a Live Virtual versus In-Person Curriculum for Medical and Pharmacy Students.医学和药学专业学生的实时虚拟课程与面对面课程的学习成果
ATS Sch. 2022 Aug 31;3(3):399-412. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0001OC. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review.电子学习在本科临床医学中的应用进展:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 7;22(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1.
5
Re-thinking the online distance instruction based on students' feedback.基于学生反馈重新思考在线远程教学。
J Comput High Educ. 2023;35(1):6-39. doi: 10.1007/s12528-022-09332-3. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
Self-directed Learning Theory to Practice: A Footstep towards the Path of being a Life-long Learne.自我导向学习:从理论到实践——迈向终身学习者之路的一步
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Jul;10(3):135-144. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.94833.1609.
7
Perception of online and face to face microbiology laboratory sessions among medical students and faculty at Arabian Gulf University: a mixed method study.《海湾阿拉伯大学生医学生和教师对线上和线下微生物学实验室课程的感知:混合方法研究》
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 30;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03346-2.
8
A Literature Review of Barriers and Opportunities Presented by Digitally Enhanced Practical Skill Teaching and Learning in Health Science Education.健康科学教育中数字增强型实践技能教学所呈现的障碍与机遇的文献综述
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2068210. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2068210.
9
Medical student's perception of the COVID-19 pandemic effect on their education and well-being: a cross-sectional survey in the United States.美国一项横断面调查:医学生对 COVID-19 大流行对其教育和健康影响的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 5;22(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03197-x.
10
Educational disruptions during the COVID-19 crisis in Small Island Developing States: Preparedness and efficacy of academics for online teaching.新冠疫情危机期间小岛屿发展中国家的教育中断:学者在线教学的准备情况与成效
Int Rev Educ. 2021;67(1-2):185-217. doi: 10.1007/s11159-021-09902-0. Epub 2021 May 15.

医学生对线下、线上及混合式学习模式的看法:来自毛里求斯一所医学院的混合方法研究

Medical Students' Perspectives on Physical, Online, and Hybrid Learning Modalities: A Mixed Methods Study From a Medical School in Mauritius.

作者信息

Robinson Jared, Banerjee Indrajit, Reechaye Driti, Perrine Anne Laure A

机构信息

Surgery, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Vacoas-Phoenix, MUS.

Pharmacology, Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Vacoas-Phoenix, MUS.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Apr 22;17(4):e82765. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82765. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.82765
PMID:40406771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12096337/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medical schools were not immune to the difficulties posed by the COVID pandemic. Educational institutions were shut down. By April 2020, 73.8% of registered students in 186 countries were adversely affected. The circumstances forced academic institutions to transition to emergency online teaching, despite the controversies of the effectiveness of this method. The absence of face-to-face teaching greatly impacted the clinical placements and affected the physical and practical skills training of many institutions.

OBJECTIVE

There is a dearth of data showing how medical students perceive blended learning. As far as the authors are aware, no study has ever addressed the experience of medical students regarding blended, online, and physical teaching in Mauritius. Therefore, the objective of the research is to address the challenges they faced and provide suggestions to tackle the drawbacks and help the betterment of the style of teaching with enhanced academic performance. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of the students' experience of these three methods was conducted.

METHODS

A mixed methods study, incorporating both qualitative and quantitative data, was conducted at Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Medical College, Mauritius, to understand medical students' perceptions of online, hybrid, and physical teaching. Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 29; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) was used for quantitative data analysis, whereas NVivo 12 Plus software was used for qualitative data analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 700 participants, 568 medical students participated in the study for quantitative data synthesis, resulting in an overall response rate of 81.14% (568). A total of 224 (69.1%) female students preferred a mixture of online and in-person lectures, followed by didactic lectures (100, 30.9%) and online (0, 0%). Among all male students, 160 (65.6%) preferred a mixture of online and in-person lectures, didactic lectures (68, 27.5%), and online lectures (16, 6.6%) (p<0.05). Webex was the most popular online video conferencing application utilized for the lectures, which was preferred by 248 (76.5%) female students, followed by Zoom (52, 16%), Google Meet (20, 6.2%), and Microsoft Teams (4, 1.2%). Regarding male students, 200 (82%) students preferred Webex, Zoom (32, 13.1%), Microsoft Teams (8, 3.3%), and Google Meet (4, 1.6%), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). A total of 144 (77.8%) Mauritian students, 34 (73.9%) South Africans, and 206 (61.7%) Indian students preferred a mixture of online and in-person lectures (p<0.05). A descriptive phenomenological qualitative data analysis generated three themes from the codes were as follows: online learning system, physical learning system, and blended learning system. Each theme had three different categories - emotional, academic, and related variables. Under each category, related codes were organized.

CONCLUSION

The novelty of this study is evident, and its practical implications stretch far beyond the lockdown and COVID-19, but its findings, particularly surrounding the reduction in the loss of class times during tropical storms and hurricanes, are invaluable. The hybrid model of teaching caters to a wider audience of students and helps create a balanced mental and physical educational experience, resulting in the best outcome for students in their studies by capitalizing on the advantages of both didactic and online lectures.

摘要

引言

医学院也未能幸免于新冠疫情带来的困难。教育机构纷纷关闭。到2020年4月,186个国家中73.8%的注册学生受到了不利影响。这些情况迫使学术机构转向应急在线教学,尽管这种教学方法的有效性存在争议。面对面教学的缺失极大地影响了临床实习安排,并影响了许多机构的实践技能培训。

目的

缺乏数据表明医学生对混合式学习的看法。就作者所知,从未有研究探讨过毛里求斯医学生对混合式、在线和实体教学的体验。因此,本研究的目的是探讨他们所面临的挑战,并提出应对缺点的建议,以帮助改进教学方式并提高学业成绩。对学生对这三种教学方法的体验进行了定性和定量评估。

方法

在毛里求斯的西沃萨古尔·拉姆古兰医学院开展了一项混合方法研究,纳入定性和定量数据,以了解医学生对在线、混合式和实体教学的看法。使用统计产品与服务解决方案(SPSS,版本29;IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,纽约州阿蒙克)进行定量数据分析,而NVivo 12 Plus软件用于定性数据分析。

结果

在700名参与者中,568名医学生参与了定量数据综合研究,总体回复率为81.14%(568人)。共有224名(69.1%)女生更喜欢在线讲座和面对面讲座相结合的方式,其次是讲授式讲座(100人,30.9%)和在线讲座(0人,0%)。在所有男生中,160名(65.6%)更喜欢在线讲座和面对面讲座相结合的方式,讲授式讲座(68人,27.5%),以及在线讲座(16人,6.6%)(p<0.05)。Webex是讲座中最受欢迎的在线视频会议应用程序,248名(76.5%)女生更喜欢它,其次是Zoom(52人,16%)、Google Meet(20人,6.2%)和Microsoft Teams(4人,1.2%)。对于男生,200名(82%)学生更喜欢Webex,其次是Zoom(32人,13.1%)、Microsoft Teams(8人,3.3%)和Google Meet(4人,1.6%),这具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。共有144名(77.8%)毛里求斯学生、34名(73.9%)南非学生和206名(61.7%)印度学生更喜欢在线讲座和面对面讲座相结合的方式(p<0.05)。描述性现象学定性数据分析从编码中生成了三个主题,如下所示:在线学习系统、实体学习系统和混合学习系统。每个主题有三个不同的类别——情感、学术和相关变量。在每个类别下,对相关编码进行了整理。

结论

本研究的新颖性显而易见,其实际意义远远超出了封锁和新冠疫情的范畴,但其研究结果,特别是围绕热带风暴和飓风期间课时损失减少的结果,具有极高的价值。混合式教学模式迎合了更广泛的学生群体,有助于创造一种平衡的身心教育体验,通过利用讲授式讲座和在线讲座的优势,为学生的学业带来最佳成果。