• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绥靖还是团结?探寻欧洲公众对欧盟外交政策看法的驱动因素。

Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU's foreign policy.

作者信息

Moise Alexandru D, Wang Chendi

机构信息

Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy.

Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Union Polit. 2025 Jun;26(2):418-441. doi: 10.1177/14651165251320837. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1177/14651165251320837
PMID:40417650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12097701/
Abstract

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, with its implications for European security, has intensified the need to understand European public opinion on potential conflict strategies. This study delves into the formation of these opinions, focusing on utilitarian factors like economic interests and threat perception, and ideological elements such as political orientation, national identity and perceptions of Russia and Ukraine. Utilising a two-wave panel survey from five European Union (EU) countries, our findings underscore that ideological factors, especially trust in Russia and Ukraine are paramount in shaping support for escalation or de-escalation. Economic concerns, threat perceptions, right-wing ideologies and strong national identities also play significant roles. This research not only illuminates European sentiment on the war in Ukraine but also enriches broader discussions on the determinants of public opinion in international conflicts.

摘要

俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵及其对欧洲安全的影响,加剧了了解欧洲公众对潜在冲突策略看法的必要性。本研究深入探讨这些看法的形成,重点关注经济利益和威胁认知等功利主义因素,以及政治取向、民族认同和对俄罗斯与乌克兰的认知等意识形态因素。利用来自五个欧盟国家的两波面板调查,我们的研究结果强调,意识形态因素,尤其是对俄罗斯和乌克兰的信任,在塑造对局势升级或降级的支持方面至关重要。经济担忧、威胁认知、右翼意识形态和强烈的民族认同也发挥着重要作用。这项研究不仅阐明了欧洲对乌克兰战争的情绪,还丰富了关于国际冲突中公众舆论决定因素的更广泛讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/2325cdcedad9/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/6a8ca5c41978/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/76123cde3570/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/72c8063c2e02/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/8fdd482cd519/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/8d93b16407cd/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/e23b873556f4/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/2325cdcedad9/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/6a8ca5c41978/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/76123cde3570/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/72c8063c2e02/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/8fdd482cd519/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/8d93b16407cd/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/e23b873556f4/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba0/12097701/2325cdcedad9/10.1177_14651165251320837-fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU's foreign policy.绥靖还是团结?探寻欧洲公众对欧盟外交政策看法的驱动因素。
Eur Union Polit. 2025 Jun;26(2):418-441. doi: 10.1177/14651165251320837. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
Division and unity: Voter and party perspectives on EU integration under external threat.分裂与团结:选民和政党对外部威胁下欧盟一体化的看法。
Eur Union Polit. 2025 Jun;26(2):296-309. doi: 10.1177/14651165251318950. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
A unified autonomous Europe? Public opinion of the EU's foreign and security policy.一个统一自治的欧洲?欧盟外交和安全政策的公众舆论。
J Eur Public Policy. 2023 May 29;30(8):1679-1698. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2217230. eCollection 2023.
4
Caught up by Geopolitics: Sanctions and the EU's Response to Russia's War Against Ukraine.受地缘政治影响:制裁与欧盟对俄罗斯对乌克兰战争的回应
Econ Voice. 2023 Oct 12;20(2):275-283. doi: 10.1515/ev-2023-0051. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
For whom the bell tolls. A spatial analysis of the renewable energy transition determinants in Europe in light of the Russia-Ukraine war.谁的钟声为谁而鸣。俄乌战争背景下欧洲可再生能源转型决定因素的空间分析。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:119833. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119833. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
6
Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-Covid-19 period.俄乌冲突后欧盟能源与气候政策的大流行后教训:新冠疫情后时期欧盟绿色复苏特刊引言
Energy Policy. 2023 Jun;177:113546. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113546. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
7
Instrumental goals shape EU citizens' attitudes to the Russia-Ukraine war over time.随着时间的推移,工具性目标塑造了欧盟公民对俄乌战争的态度。
Int J Psychol. 2023 Dec;58(6):563-573. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12932. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Demand-side constraints on European solidarity for energy sanctions: Experimental evidence from seven EU countries.欧洲能源制裁团结方面的需求侧限制:来自七个欧盟国家的实验证据。
Eur Union Polit. 2025 Jun;26(2):344-368. doi: 10.1177/14651165251318955. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
9
Two functionalist logics of European Union polity formation under external threat: Evidence from a conjoint experiment.外部威胁下欧盟政体形成的两种功能主义逻辑:来自联合实验的证据
Eur Union Polit. 2025 Jun;26(2):369-392. doi: 10.1177/14651165251320870. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
10
Beliefs in Misinformation About COVID-19 and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Are Linked: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey Study.关于新冠疫情的错误信息信念与俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵信念有关联:来自一项全国代表性调查研究的证据。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Mar 10;5:e62913. doi: 10.2196/62913.

本文引用的文献

1
The Russian threat and the consolidation of the West: How populism and EU-skepticism shape party support for Ukraine.俄罗斯的威胁与西方的巩固:民粹主义和对欧盟的怀疑态度如何影响各政党对乌克兰的支持。
Eur Union Polit. 2024 Sep;25(3):459-482. doi: 10.1177/14651165241237136. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
A unified autonomous Europe? Public opinion of the EU's foreign and security policy.一个统一自治的欧洲?欧盟外交和安全政策的公众舆论。
J Eur Public Policy. 2023 May 29;30(8):1679-1698. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2217230. eCollection 2023.
3
Are attitudes toward peace and war the two sides of the same coin? Evidence to the contrary from a French validation of the Attitudes Toward Peace and War Scale.
对和平与战争的态度是同一枚硬币的两面吗?来自法国对《和平与战争态度量表》验证的相反证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 11;12(9):e0184001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184001. eCollection 2017.
4
The determinants of Australians' attitudes toward the Gulf War.澳大利亚人对海湾战争态度的决定因素。
J Soc Psychol. 1994 Jun;134(3):317-30. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711736.