• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以英文撰写学术论文以供发表面临的语言挑战:中国理工科院校学者的看法

Linguistic challenges of writing papers in English for scholarly publication: Perceptions of Chinese academics in science and engineering.

作者信息

Zhang Yihua, Eto Hiroyuki, Cui Jianlei

机构信息

Graduate School of International Cultural Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324760. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324760
PMID:40424311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12111667/
Abstract

This study investigates the linguistic challenges encountered by Chinese academics in science and engineering when writing for English-language scholarly publications. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research draws on survey responses from 732 participants and insights from semi-structured interviews with 13 interviewees. Sentence construction emerged as the most significant challenge, followed by issues with vocabulary selection, cohesive devices, coherence, and grammar, with notable variation across academic ranks. Common strategies to address these challenges include utilizing online tools, seeking peer support, and employing professional editing services. The findings offer actionable recommendations for tailored academic writing training, institutional support, and the integration of advanced technological tools, aiming to enhance publication success rates among non-native English-speaking scholars.

摘要

本研究调查了中国理工科科研人员在撰写英文学术出版物时所面临的语言挑战。该研究采用混合方法,借鉴了732名参与者的调查反馈以及对13名受访者进行半结构化访谈所获得的见解。句子构建成为最显著的挑战,其次是词汇选择、衔接手段、连贯性和语法问题,不同学术职级之间存在显著差异。应对这些挑战的常见策略包括使用在线工具、寻求同行支持以及聘请专业编辑服务。研究结果为量身定制的学术写作培训、机构支持以及先进技术工具的整合提供了可操作的建议,旨在提高非英语母语学者的发表成功率。

相似文献

1
Linguistic challenges of writing papers in English for scholarly publication: Perceptions of Chinese academics in science and engineering.以英文撰写学术论文以供发表面临的语言挑战:中国理工科院校学者的看法
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324760. eCollection 2025.
2
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
3
Going Beyond "Not Enough Time": Barriers to Preparing Manuscripts for Academic Medical Journals.超越“时间不足”:准备学术医学期刊稿件的障碍。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):71-81. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1659144. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
4
Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences.由于英语在科学领域的主导地位而导致的科学论文编写和发表方面的劣势:以哥伦比亚生物科学研究人员为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238372. eCollection 2020.
5
Self-regulated learning strategies adopted by successful Chinese nursing students in the process of learning Nursing English.成功的中国护理专业学生在学习护理英语过程中采用的自我调节学习策略。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 8;19(8):e0308353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308353. eCollection 2024.
6
Writing Support Group for Medical School Faculty-A Simple Way to Do It.医学教师写作支持小组——一种简单的方法
Teach Learn Med. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(5):601-608. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2022.2092114. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
7
Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies.学术出版需要语言包容性政策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 13;291(2018):20232840. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2840.
8
[Specific features of written medical English language].[医学英语书面语的具体特征]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Sep-Oct;138(9-10):668-73.
9
Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program.促进全球护理研究:提升护理科学写作(WINS)计划。
Int Nurs Rev. 2019 Dec;66(4):541-548. doi: 10.1111/inr.12552. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Peer feedback and Chinese medical students' English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study.同伴反馈与中国医学生英语学术写作能力发展:一项纵向干预研究
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04574-w.

本文引用的文献

1
How international doctoral students' fields of study, proficiency in English and gender interact with their sense of making progress in English academic writing abilities.国际博士生的研究领域、英语熟练程度和性别如何相互作用,影响他们在英语学术写作能力方面的进步感。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 22;18(12):e0296186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296186. eCollection 2023.
2
English as a foreign language writing anxiety and its relationship with self-esteem and mobile phone addiction among Chinese medical students-A structural equation model analysis.中国医学生外语写作焦虑及其与自尊和手机成瘾的关系——结构方程模型分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284335. eCollection 2023.
3
Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing.学术评审中语言偏见的初步证据。
J Engl Acad Purp. 2020 Sep;47. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences.由于英语在科学领域的主导地位而导致的科学论文编写和发表方面的劣势:以哥伦比亚生物科学研究人员为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238372. eCollection 2020.
5
Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies.COVID-19 的文献计量分析:英文和中文研究的比较。
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;8:477. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00477. eCollection 2020.
6
Correction: Effects of providing manuscript editing through a combination of in-house and external editing services in an academic hospital.更正:在一家学术医院通过内部和外部编辑服务相结合的方式提供稿件编辑的效果
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232642. eCollection 2020.
7
Different strokes for different folks: Examining additive and complimentary effects of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research outcomes.因人而异:考察咨询工作联盟和研究团队凝聚力对学员研究成果的附加和补充作用。
J Couns Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):104-113. doi: 10.1037/cou0000314. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016).语言不公正只是个神话吗?对海兰德(2016年)的回应。
J Second Lang Writ. 2016 Dec;34:3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
9
Take me where I want to go: Institutional prestige, advisor sponsorship, and academic career placement preferences.带我去我想去的地方:机构声望、导师支持与学术职业安置偏好。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176977. eCollection 2017.
10
Science PhD career preferences: levels, changes, and advisor encouragement.科学博士职业偏好:水平、变化和导师鼓励。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036307. Epub 2012 May 2.