Strange C A, Mackie M J, Marnell J H, McEvoy P
Clin Lab Haematol. 1985;7(2):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1985.tb00019.x.
The ELT-800 WBC and three-part WBC screen have been evaluated. Technical assessment showed each to be satisfactory but in a small number of samples, the total WBC was found to be incorrect. Discrepancies were found in some cases of chronic lymphatic leukaemia, sickle cell disease and paraproteinaemia. The reasons for these differences are discussed. In the population studied, an accurate WBC screen was obtained on 87.3% of samples. Initial instrument WBC screen rejection occurred on 12.7% but in only 2.1% could no explanation be found to account for this.
对ELT - 800白细胞计数仪和三分群白细胞筛查进行了评估。技术评估显示二者均令人满意，但在少数样本中，发现白细胞总数不正确。在一些慢性淋巴细胞白血病、镰状细胞病和副蛋白血症病例中发现了差异。讨论了这些差异产生的原因。在所研究的人群中，87.3%的样本获得了准确的白细胞筛查结果。最初仪器白细胞筛查拒收率为12.7%，但其中只有2.1%无法找到对此的解释。
