Zhang Xiaoyu, Ennequin Gaël, Blazevich Anthony J, Ratel Sébastien
AME2P, UFR STAPS, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Centre for Human Performance, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Children (Basel). 2025 May 10;12(5):619. doi: 10.3390/children12050619.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of relative age on gross motor coordination (GMC) development, taking into account biological maturity and sex.
729 participants aged 10 to 16 years completed three GMC tests newly designed to minimize the potentially confounding effects of physical fitness. The tests included a Hand-Foot coordination test, Dribbling-Targeting test (DT test), and a T balance and agility test (T test). Relative age was determined using birth quartiles: BQ (January-March); BQ (April-June); BQ (July-September); and BQ (October-December). Regarding biological maturity, the participants were categorized according to their estimated peak height velocity (pre- and post-PHV).
Relative age did not significantly impact the overall GMC score. In contrast, biological maturity emerged as a significant determinant of GMC, with post-PHV participants outperforming their pre-PHV counterparts in the three tests ( < 0.001). The results also showed a significant main effect of sex in the DT and T tests, i.e., in tasks involving dynamic coordination and agility, with boys consistently outperforming girls ( < 0.001). Significant biological maturity × sex interactions in the DT and T tests also indicated an advantage of boys over girls with advancing biological maturity ( < 0.05).
these findings highlight the importance of considering biological maturity and sex rather than relative age in GMC development from childhood through adolescence.
本研究旨在探讨相对年龄对粗大运动协调(GMC)发展的影响,同时考虑生物成熟度和性别因素。
729名年龄在10至16岁的参与者完成了三项新设计的GMC测试,以尽量减少身体素质潜在的混杂效应。这些测试包括手足协调测试、运球目标测试(DT测试)和T平衡与敏捷性测试(T测试)。相对年龄通过出生四分位数确定:第一四分位数(1月至3月);第二四分位数(4月至6月);第三四分位数(7月至9月);第四四分位数(10月至12月)。关于生物成熟度,参与者根据其估计的身高增长峰值速度(身高增长峰值前和后)进行分类。
相对年龄对总体GMC得分没有显著影响。相比之下,生物成熟度成为GMC的一个重要决定因素,身高增长峰值后的参与者在三项测试中的表现优于身高增长峰值前的参与者(<0.001)。结果还显示,在DT测试和T测试中,性别存在显著的主效应,即在涉及动态协调和敏捷性的任务中,男孩始终优于女孩(<0.001)。DT测试和T测试中显著的生物成熟度×性别交互作用也表明,随着生物成熟度的提高,男孩比女孩更具优势(<0.05)。
这些发现凸显了在从儿童期到青春期的GMC发展过程中,考虑生物成熟度和性别而非相对年龄的重要性。