Moustakli Efthalia, Potiris Anastasios, Zikopoulos Athanasios, Zachariou Athanasios, Topis Spyridon, Panagopoulos Periklis, Domali Ekaterini, Drakakis Peter, Stavros Sofoklis
Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON", Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Biomedicines. 2025 May 21;13(5):1257. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051257.
Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a novel intervention at the intersection of reproductive medicine and regenerative biology. As women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), poor response to stimulation, or premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) seek fertility solutions, PRP provides a scientifically plausible-yet exploratory-strategy to restore or augment ovarian function. The proposed pathways include the stimulation of local stem cells, tissue remodeling, neoangiogenesis, and the potential reawakening of dormant follicles. This narrative review critically synthesizes the existing literature on intraovarian PRP therapy. It draws from published case series, pilot studies, and preclinical data to evaluate the biological rationale, clinical outcomes, and current limitations of PRP use in women with DOR and POI. Early clinical findings, albeit limited to modest case series and pilot investigations, reveal promising outcomes such as improved ovarian reserve markers, menstrual restoration, and infrequent spontaneous pregnancies in women who had previously been unresponsive to treatment. However, the variability in preparation techniques, patient selection criteria, and outcome measures limits the generalizability of these results. While intraovarian PRP presents an exciting frontier in reproductive medicine, the absence of defined protocols, controlled trials, and long-term safety data underscores its experimental nature. Future research should focus on standardizing methodologies, conducting randomized controlled trials, and elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying observed clinical effects to establish PRP's role in managing poor ovarian response and POI.
卵巢内富血小板血浆(PRP)已成为生殖医学与再生生物学交叉领域的一种新型干预手段。随着卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)、对促排卵反应不良或卵巢早衰(POI)的女性寻求生育解决方案,PRP提供了一种科学上看似合理但仍具探索性的策略来恢复或增强卵巢功能。其提出的作用途径包括刺激局部干细胞、组织重塑、新生血管形成以及潜在地唤醒休眠卵泡。本叙述性综述批判性地综合了关于卵巢内PRP治疗的现有文献。它借鉴已发表的病例系列、初步研究和临床前数据,以评估PRP在DOR和POI女性中应用的生物学原理、临床结果及当前局限性。早期临床发现,尽管仅限于适度的病例系列和初步研究,但揭示了一些有前景的结果,如卵巢储备标志物改善、月经恢复以及先前对治疗无反应的女性中偶发的自然妊娠。然而,制备技术、患者选择标准和结局指标的变异性限制了这些结果的可推广性。虽然卵巢内PRP在生殖医学中展现出一个令人兴奋的前沿领域,但缺乏明确的方案、对照试验和长期安全性数据突出了其试验性质。未来的研究应专注于使方法标准化、开展随机对照试验以及阐明观察到的临床效果背后的分子机制,以确立PRP在管理卵巢反应不良和POI中的作用。