Ansoleaga Elisa, Ahumada Magdalena, Soto-Contreras Elena, Vera Javier
Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8370067, Chile.
Faculty of Psychology, Alberto Hurtado University, Santiago 8340576, Chile.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 14;13(10):1144. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101144.
Work is a key social determinant of mental health, and adverse organizational conditions in healthcare settings increase psychosocial risks. Leadership influences workplace well-being, yet its impact on mental health and gender inequalities remains underexplored. Despite the feminization of the health sector, disparities persist in leadership access, role expectations, and work-family reconciliation, exacerbating occupational stress. This study examines leadership practices in public hospitals, focusing on their relationship with mental health, organizational dimensions (recognition and role stress), and gender disparities. It explores the perspectives of both workers and managers to understand how leadership shapes workplace conditions and well-being. A qualitative, cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the FONDECYT project 1220547. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 64 workers from public hospitals in Santiago, Chile, including clinical and administrative staff. The analysis supported by Grounded Theory identified key categories: constructive and destructive leadership, recognition, role stress, and gender disparities in leadership. Constructive leadership-characterized by communication, fairness, and recognition-was linked to a healthier work environment and improved well-being. In contrast, destructive leadership (characterized by abuse of power and imposition, or inaction, lack of support, and absence of effective direction) contributed to role stress, workplace mistreatment, and job dissatisfaction. Recognition was a crucial but insufficient motivator, as the lack of formal mechanisms led to frustration. Role stress emerged as a significant risk for well-being, with subordinates experiencing overload, ambiguity, and conflicting expectations. Gender inequalities persisted as women faced more tremendous barriers to leadership and difficulties balancing work and family responsibilities. Workers and managers had differing perspectives, with subordinates prioritizing fairness and recognition while managers emphasized operational constraints. Leadership training should emphasize trust, equity, and recognition to enhance workplace well-being. Institutional policies must address role stress, strengthen formal recognition systems, and promote gender equity in leadership. Future research should integrate quantitative methods to explore leadership's impact on organizational conditions and mental health outcomes.
工作是心理健康的关键社会决定因素,医疗环境中的不良组织状况会增加心理社会风险。领导力会影响工作场所的幸福感,但其对心理健康和性别不平等的影响仍未得到充分探索。尽管卫生部门出现了女性化趋势,但在领导力获取、角色期望以及工作与家庭协调方面的差距依然存在,这加剧了职业压力。本研究考察公立医院中的领导行为,重点关注其与心理健康、组织层面(认可与角色压力)以及性别差异之间的关系。研究探讨了员工和管理者双方的观点,以了解领导力如何塑造工作场所条件和幸福感。作为国家科学技术发展基金项目1220547的一部分,开展了一项定性横断面研究。对智利圣地亚哥公立医院的64名员工进行了半结构化访谈,包括临床和行政人员。扎根理论支持的分析确定了关键类别:建设性和破坏性领导、认可、角色压力以及领导方面的性别差异。建设性领导的特点是沟通、公平和认可,与更健康的工作环境和幸福感提升相关。相比之下,破坏性领导(特点是滥用权力、强制或不作为、缺乏支持以及缺乏有效指导)导致角色压力、工作场所的虐待行为和工作不满。认可是一个关键但并不充分的激励因素,因为缺乏正式机制会导致挫败感。角色压力成为幸福感的重大风险,下属会经历工作负荷过重、职责不明确以及期望冲突。性别不平等依然存在,因为女性在获取领导权方面面临更大障碍,在平衡工作和家庭责任方面也存在困难。员工和管理者观点不同,下属将公平和认可放在首位,而管理者强调运营限制。领导力培训应强调信任、公平和认可,以提升工作场所的幸福感。机构政策必须解决角色压力问题,加强正式认可系统,并促进领导方面的性别平等。未来研究应采用定量方法,以探索领导力对组织状况和心理健康结果的影响。