Zheng Weiqing, Zhang Yuyang, Huang Jingzhi, Wu Qinglu, Fu Jintong, Wen Yongwei, Fang Siyu, Yang Xiaoyan, Xia Qianfeng
NHC Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Control, School of Tropical Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Longhua District, Haikou 571199, China.
Jiang Pest Control (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Huadu District, Guangzhou 510880, China.
Insects. 2025 Apr 29;16(5):467. doi: 10.3390/insects16050467.
To investigate the repellent efficacy of commercially available mosquito repellents in China against , four representative DEET-based repellents and biont-derived repellents were selected. This study utilized a modified circular filter paper method repellent testing device to establish an evaluation system for assessing the repellent effects of each product against three developmental stages of : larvae, nymphs, and adults. In our study, for DEET-based repellents, Johnson demonstrated the highest repellency against larvae within 1 h, with an average repellency rate exceeding 80.14%. Yamei and Johnson exhibited repellency rates more than 91.11% for nymphs within 1 h, surpassing the other two DEET products. Repellency rates of Longliqi and Xiaohuanxiong fluctuated between 80.95% and 100% at different time points. Yamei, Longliqi, and Johnson achieved 100% repellency to adults within 1 h, while Xiaohuanxiong showed slightly lower efficacy. The four biont-derived repellents showed significant variations in efficacy: larval-stage repellency ranged from 14.29% to 88.89%, nymphal-stage repellency from 57.89% to 100%, and adult-stage repellency from 50% to 79.49%. CaliforniaBaby exhibited the highest efficacy, comparable or superior to DEET-based products, whereas Longhu demonstrated the weakest repellency and poor persistence. We further conducted a persistence test for CaliforniaBaby and found that it maintained >75% repellency against for 6 h. This study provides scientific evidence for selecting tick repellents in practice, offers guidance for purchasing commercial biont-derived tick repellents, and serves as a reference for developing safer, more effective tick repellents.
为研究中国市售驱蚊剂对蜱虫的驱避效果,选取了四种具有代表性的避蚊胺类驱蚊剂和生物源驱蚊剂。本研究采用改良的圆形滤纸法驱蚊测试装置,建立了一个评估系统,以评估每种产品对蜱虫三个发育阶段(幼虫、若虫和成虫)的驱避效果。在我们的研究中,对于避蚊胺类驱蚊剂,强生在1小时内对幼虫的驱避率最高,平均驱避率超过80.14%。雅美和强生在1小时内对若虫的驱避率超过91.11%,超过其他两种避蚊胺产品。隆力奇和小浣熊在不同时间点的驱避率在80.95%至100%之间波动。雅美、隆力奇和强生在1小时内对成虫的驱避率达到100%,而小浣熊的效果略低。四种生物源驱蚊剂的效果存在显著差异:幼虫阶段的驱避率在14.29%至88.89%之间,若虫阶段的驱避率在57.89%至100%之间,成虫阶段的驱避率在50%至79.49%之间。加州宝贝表现出最高的效果,与避蚊胺类产品相当或更优,而龙虎的驱避效果最弱且持久性差。我们进一步对加州宝贝进行了持久性测试,发现它对蜱虫的驱避率在6小时内保持>75%。本研究为实际选择蜱虫驱避剂提供了科学依据,为购买商业生物源蜱虫驱避剂提供了指导,并为开发更安全、更有效的蜱虫驱避剂提供了参考。