Suppr超能文献

在炎热环境下,对混合静态和动态工作与主要是动态工作的效果进行比较。

A comparison of the effects of mixed static and dynamic work with mainly dynamic work in hot conditions.

作者信息

Randle I P, Legg S J

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985;54(2):201-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02335930.

Abstract

Current physiological criteria for limiting work in hot conditions are frequently based on responses to mainly dynamic work (eg treadmill walking). Their applicability to industrial situations containing mixed static and dynamic work is questioned, since the physiological responses to static work are different from those of dynamic work. Each of eight subjects attempted a one hour uphill treadmill walk (mainly dynamic work), and an uphill treadmill walk whilst intermittently carrying a 20 kg weight in the arms (mixed static and dynamic work). The external work rates in the two conditions were equal, effected by lowering the treadmill gradient in the loaded condition. Experiments were conducted in a hot climate (33 degrees C dry bulb, 25 degrees C wet bulb). Oxygen consumption, minute ventilation, sweat rate and rated perceived exertion were all significantly higher (p less than 0.001) for the mixed static and dynamic work than for the dynamic work. This was also the case for heart rate and forearm skin temperature (p less than 0.01), and for auditory canal temperature (p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two types of work for mean skin temperature, calf skin temperature and chest skin temperature. These results show that for the same external work, physiological strain and perceived exertion are greater for mixed static and dynamic work (carrying a load in the arms) than for mainly dynamic work (walking on a treadmill). They suggest that it is not appropriate to make direct comparisons of laboratory studies based on dynamic work, with practical situations containing mixed static and dynamic work in the heat.

摘要

当前在炎热条件下限制工作的生理标准通常基于对主要动态工作(如在跑步机上行走)的反应。由于对静态工作的生理反应与动态工作不同,因此这些标准在包含静态和动态混合工作的工业环境中的适用性受到质疑。八名受试者每人都尝试了一次在跑步机上进行一小时的上坡行走(主要是动态工作),以及一次在手臂间歇性负重20公斤的情况下进行上坡跑步机行走(静态和动态混合工作)。两种情况下的外部工作速率相等,通过在负重情况下降低跑步机坡度来实现。实验在炎热气候(干球温度33摄氏度,湿球温度25摄氏度)下进行。对于静态和动态混合工作,耗氧量、每分通气量、出汗率和主观用力感觉评分均显著高于动态工作(p<0.001)。心率、前臂皮肤温度也是如此(p<0.01),外耳道温度也是如此(p<0.05)。对于平均皮肤温度、小腿皮肤温度和胸部皮肤温度,两种工作类型之间没有显著差异。这些结果表明,对于相同的外部工作,静态和动态混合工作(手臂负重)的生理应激和主观用力感觉比主要动态工作(在跑步机上行走)更大。它们表明,将基于动态工作的实验室研究与炎热环境中包含静态和动态混合工作的实际情况进行直接比较是不合适的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验