Vareta Diana, Oliveira Célia, McCormack Brendan, Slater Paul, Tyagi Vaibhav, Ventura Filipa
PhD Program, University of Lisbon (UL) and Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Egas Moniz Interdisciplinary Research Centre (CiiEM), Egas Moniz Universitary Institute, Monte de Caparica, Portugal.
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0324286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324286. eCollection 2025.
In person-centered practice implementation and development, it is essential to incorporate standardized measurements that consider the perspectives of those involved in the therapeutic relationship. This work aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Person-Centered Practice Inventory - Care (PCPI-C) for the Portuguese healthcare context. The PCPI-C is derived from the middle-range theory of the Person-Centered Practice Framework and is an 18-item self-reported inventory.
This methodological study followed a two-stage research design entailing the translation and cultural adaptation of the PCPI-C from English to European Portuguese and the Portuguese healthcare context in phase I, followed by a psychometric evaluation (N = 312) conducted using principal component and confirmatory factor analysis in SPSS version 27.0 and SPSS AMOS version 21.0 in phase II. The model was continuously and iteratively refined until it was considered acceptable per gold standard estimators.
In phase I, the results revealed linguistic and contextual cultural differences compared to the original version. The cognitive debriefing showed that the respondents considered the items understandable and adequate for the purpose. In phase II, among the two adjusted PCPI-C models fit, i.e., first-order, and single-factor, the best fit to the empirical data was revealed by the single-factor structure, reflecting a good fit (x2/df = 2.408, CFI = .93, RMSEA = .07, SRMR = .05).
The PCPI-C is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the perceptions of Portuguese service users regarding person-centered practice. It is necessary to consider the purpose for which the instrument is used to select the most appropriate measurement model, i.e., process evaluation as an outcome or as an inventory measure for continuous improvement.
在以患者为中心的实践实施与发展过程中,纳入能够考量治疗关系中各方观点的标准化测量方法至关重要。本研究旨在针对葡萄牙医疗保健背景,对以患者为中心的实践量表 - 护理版(PCPI - C)进行翻译、文化调适及验证。PCPI - C源自以患者为中心的实践框架的中程理论,是一份包含18个条目的自评量表。
本方法学研究采用两阶段研究设计。第一阶段,将PCPI - C从英语翻译并调适至欧洲葡萄牙语及葡萄牙医疗保健背景;第二阶段,使用SPSS 27.0版和SPSS AMOS 21.0版进行主成分分析和验证性因素分析,对312名受试者进行心理测量评估。该模型持续迭代优化,直至根据金标准估计量被认为可接受。
在第一阶段,结果显示与原始版本相比存在语言和情境文化差异。认知访谈表明,受访者认为这些条目易于理解且适用于该目的。在第二阶段,在两个调整后的PCPI - C模型拟合中,即一阶模型和单因素模型,单因素结构对实证数据的拟合最佳,显示出良好的拟合度(卡方/自由度 = 2.408,比较拟合指数 = 0.93,近似误差均方根 = 0.07,标准化残差均方根 = 0.05)。
PCPI - C是评估葡萄牙服务使用者对以患者为中心实践看法的有效且可靠工具。有必要根据该工具的使用目的选择最合适的测量模型,即作为结果的过程评估或作为持续改进的量表测量。