de Souza Walber Jose Figueiredo, Clemente Filipe Manuel, Aguiar Samuel da Silva, Pittner Larissa, Araújo Erivaldo Machado, Rocha Matheus de Souza, Silva Francielli Evelin Lopes, Silva Ana Filipa, Castro Henrique de Oliveira
Physical Education Department, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil.
Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
J Hum Kinet. 2024 Dec 19;97:127-140. doi: 10.5114/jhk/190400. eCollection 2025 Apr.
This study aims to examine the tactical behavior, decision-making, and technical skills of young novice basketball players in small-sided games (SSGs) with different numerical configurations and court sizes. Participants were 16 novice male players aged between 11 and 15 years with no competitive experience. A total of 13 games were played, comprising nine SSG formats with numerical equality, superiority, and inferiority, in two court sizes: a full court (FC) and a half court (HC). In SSGs played in the FC, pass efficacy was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in 5 vs. 4 and 4 vs. 3 formats, while dribble efficacy was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the 2 vs. 1 HC format. The 3 vs. 3 FC format showed greater (p < 0.05) shot efficacy. Reception efficacy was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the 2 vs. 1 HC format, as well as rebound efficacy. However, appropriate passes were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the 4 vs. 3 FC format. Dribble efficacy was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the 2 vs. 1 HC format and appropriate shots were significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the 2 vs. 1 HC format. Regarding defensive and offensive technical-tactical actions, the 3 vs. 3 HC format presented significantly higher values (p < 0.05) of support, while ball marking was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in the 3 vs. 2 HC format. In conclusion, this study indicates that smaller (balanced and unbalanced) SSG formats tend to enhance the frequency, effectiveness, and appropriateness of attacking and defensive behaviors, particularly those involving direct actions.
本研究旨在考察年轻的新手篮球运动员在不同人数配置和场地大小的小范围比赛(SSG)中的战术行为、决策能力和技术技能。参与者为16名年龄在11至15岁之间、无比赛经验的男性新手球员。共进行了13场比赛,包括9种人数相等、优势和劣势的SSG形式,场地大小分为两种:全场(FC)和半场(HC)。在全场进行的SSG中,5对4和4对3形式的传球效率显著更高(p < 0.05),而在2对1半场形式中运球效率显著更高(p < 0.05)。3对3全场形式的投篮效率更高(p < 0.05)。2对1半场形式的接球效率以及篮板球效率显著更高(p < 0.05)。然而,4对3全场形式的合理传球显著更低(p < 0.05)。2对1半场形式的运球效率显著更高(p < 0.05),2对1半场形式的合理投篮也显著更多(p < 0.05)。关于防守和进攻技术战术动作,3对3半场形式的支持值显著更高(p < 0.05),而在3对2半场形式中球的紧逼防守显著更强(p < 0.05)。总之,本研究表明较小(平衡和不平衡)的SSG形式往往会提高进攻和防守行为的频率、有效性和合理性,特别是那些涉及直接动作的行为。