Clemente Filipe Manuel, Sanches Rita, Moleiro Carlos Filipe, Gomes Mónica, Lima Ricardo
Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer, Melgaço, Portugal.
Instituto de Telecomunicações, Delegação da Covilhã, Covilhã, Portugal.
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jan 31;71:179-189. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0082. eCollection 2020 Jan.
The aim of this study was twofold: i) to compare the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and the frequencies of technical actions per minute in different small-sided games (SSGs) between under-14 and under-16 age groups, and ii) to compare the RPE and the frequencies of technical actions per minute between 1 x 1, 2 x 2, 3 x 3, 4 x 4 and 5 x 5 formats within age groups. Twenty young male basketball players from the same club (N = 10, from under-14; N = 10, from under-16) competing at the national level voluntarily participated in this study. Five different SSGs (1 x 1, 2 x 2, 3 x 3, 4 x 4 and 5 x 5) were played twice on courts of the same relative area and were compared in terms of the RPE and technical actions. The number of technical-tactical actions per minute, i.e. conquered balls (CB), received balls (RB), lost balls (LB), attacking balls/passes (AB), shots (S), rebounds (R), and the RPE were collected for each player for each SSG session. The results revealed that most of the differences between age groups were considered trivial/small and/or unclear for all SSG formats, though likely moderate differences between age groups were found in 1 x 1 and 2 x 2 SSGs, revealing that young players had greater frequencies of received, conquered, and lost balls. Within-age-group comparisons also showed moderate-to-large increases in technical actions during smaller formats than during larger ones. The main evidence of this study revealed that age group seemed not to largely influence the RPE or technical actions during different SSGs. However, smaller formats moderately-to-largely increased the number of technical actions. Interestingly, the biggest format (5 x 5) largely increased the RPE in comparison to the remaining formats. As a conclusion, technical actions and the RPE were influenced more by the format of play than by the age group.
一是比较14岁以下和16岁以下年龄组在不同小范围比赛(SSG)中自感用力度(RPE)和每分钟技术动作频率;二是比较各年龄组内1对1、2对2、3对3、4对4和5对5比赛形式下的RPE和每分钟技术动作频率。来自同一俱乐部的20名年轻男性篮球运动员(14岁以下10名;16岁以下10名),他们参加国家级比赛,自愿参与了本研究。在相同相对面积的球场上进行了5种不同的小范围比赛(1对1、2对2、3对3、4对4和5对5),每种比赛进行两次,并就RPE和技术动作进行比较。收集了每位球员在每次小范围比赛中的每分钟技术战术动作数量,即控球(CB)、接球(RB)、失球(LB)、进攻球/传球(AB)、投篮(S)、篮板(R)以及RPE。结果显示,对于所有小范围比赛形式,年龄组之间的大多数差异被认为微不足道/较小和/或不明确,尽管在1对1和2对2的小范围比赛中发现年龄组之间可能存在中等差异,这表明年轻球员接球、控球和失球的频率更高。组内比较还显示,较小比赛形式下的技术动作比大比赛形式下有中等至大幅增加。本研究的主要证据表明,年龄组似乎对不同小范围比赛中的RPE或技术动作没有很大影响。然而,较小的比赛形式会适度至大幅增加技术动作的数量。有趣的是,与其他比赛形式相比,最大的比赛形式(5对5)大幅增加了RPE。总之,技术动作和RPE受比赛形式的影响大于年龄组。