Campagna Davide, Cucuzza Francesca, Martines Giuseppe Fabio, Amico Lorena, Pennisi Monica, Aiello Eva Francesca, Polosa Riccardo, Carpinteri Giuseppe
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Emergency Department, Policlinico Teaching Hospital, G. Rodolico, Catania, Italy.
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-04000-7.
The management of the Emergency Department (ED) of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is currently challenging due to its clinical heterogeneity. The most rapid method to assess brain damage is to perform a brain computed tomography (CT) scan. Stratification scores, as the Canadian CT Head Rule or the New Orleans Criteria, can be used for a quick and safe rule-out for mTBI, but scientific literature highlights how these scores are misused in real life leading to perform useless brain CT scans with radiation exposure, even in patients who do not need it. In the last years, some scientific associations have suggested the use of a biomarker to help clinicians in decision-making in this field. Given these premises, in this study we evaluated the effectiveness of two biomarkers, the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), in predicting the necessity of performing a CT scan of the brain in the study population calculated as Negative Predictive Value (NPV) compared to CT scan reports. From January 2023, we enrolled 101 participants with mTBI who underwent a brain CT scan and blood test to assess levels of two biomarkers at the ED of Policlinico Teaching Hospital of Catania, Italy. 17 participants had a positive brain CT scan report. Of these, 13 reported an "elevated" levels of biomarkers, and 4 a "not elevated" levels leading to an NPV of 86.6%. A specialist neuroradiologist reassessed, in blind, all CT scans leading to the re-evaluation of 9 CT scans, initially reported as positive by the ED radiologist, which were then reassessed as negative. The results yielded an NPV of 100%. Our study suggests that GFAP and UCH-L1 can be effectively used in the management of patients with mTBI for a rapid and safe rule-out of the patients.
由于轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者的临床异质性,急诊科(ED)对其的管理目前具有挑战性。评估脑损伤最快速的方法是进行脑部计算机断层扫描(CT)。分层评分,如加拿大CT头部规则或新奥尔良标准,可用于快速安全地排除mTBI,但科学文献强调这些评分在现实生活中被滥用,导致即使在不需要的患者中也进行无用的脑部CT扫描,从而使患者受到辐射。在过去几年中,一些科学协会建议使用生物标志物来帮助临床医生在该领域进行决策。基于这些前提,在本研究中,我们评估了两种生物标志物,即胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素羧基末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1),与CT扫描报告相比,以阴性预测值(NPV)计算在研究人群中预测进行脑部CT扫描必要性的有效性。从2023年1月起,我们招募了101名患有mTBI的参与者,他们在意大利卡塔尼亚综合教学医院急诊科接受了脑部CT扫描和血液检查,以评估两种生物标志物的水平。17名参与者的脑部CT扫描报告呈阳性。其中,13名报告生物标志物水平“升高”,4名报告水平“未升高”,导致NPV为86.6%。一名专业神经放射科医生对所有CT扫描进行了盲法重新评估,导致对9份最初被急诊科放射科医生报告为阳性的CT扫描进行了重新评估,随后重新评估为阴性。结果得出NPV为100%。我们的研究表明,GFAP和UCH-L1可有效地用于mTBI患者的管理,以便快速安全地排除患者。