• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于策略的形成性模拟测试评估本科医学生专业相关能力的研究

Strategy-based evaluation of a formative simulation test assessing professionally relevant competences of undergraduate medical students.

作者信息

Prediger Sarah, Gärtner Julia, Jebram Lea, Harendza Sigrid

机构信息

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Medizinische Klinik, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;42(2):Doc21. doi: 10.3205/zma001745. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3205/zma001745
PMID:40469963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131502/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A strategy-based evaluation of new teaching or examination formats is recommended in order to check their suitability before a possible integration into a medical curriculum. The aim of the project was to evaluate an established formative competence- and simulation-based examination format for medical students in a standardized way.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

In a realistic simulation of a first working day in hospital, medical students at the end of their studies were given the opportunity to test their medical competences and to develop them further on the basis of self-assessment and feedback. In the years 2020 to 2023, a total of 879 students participated. This included 707 students in their final year (PJ) and 172 students before their PJ. The simulation format was evaluated in a standardized manner based on the Stanford criteria for evaluating clinical teaching. The free text comments were analyzed by content using MAXQDA.

RESULTS

The quality of the training, the practical learning content and aspects of the individual training phases are the most important areas of the student evaluation. The learning atmosphere, the leadership and the assessments and feedback received are described positively. There are also clear indications that the simulation format promotes understanding and retention and supports self-directed learning well. Overall, participants gave the teaching format an average school grade of 1.26±.45. Some evaluation results have already been implemented in the adaptation of the simulation.

CONCLUSION

The integration of the simulation format into medical curricula can be recommended on the basis of this evaluation. Further development of the format is also possible.

摘要

目标

建议对新的教学或考试形式进行基于策略的评估,以便在可能纳入医学课程之前检查其适用性。该项目的目的是以标准化方式评估一种既定的、基于能力形成和模拟的医学生考试形式。

项目描述

在对医院第一个工作日的真实模拟中,即将毕业的医学生有机会测试他们的医学能力,并在自我评估和反馈的基础上进一步提升。在2020年至2023年期间,共有879名学生参与。其中包括707名最后一年的学生(PJ)和172名PJ之前的学生。根据斯坦福临床教学评估标准,以标准化方式对模拟形式进行了评估。使用MAXQDA对自由文本评论进行了内容分析。

结果

培训质量、实践学习内容和各个培训阶段的方面是学生评估中最重要的领域。学生对学习氛围、领导力以及所获得的评估和反馈给予了积极评价。也有明确迹象表明,模拟形式促进了理解和记忆,并很好地支持了自主学习。总体而言,参与者给这种教学形式的平均成绩为1.26±.45。一些评估结果已在模拟的调整中得到应用。

结论

基于此次评估,可建议将模拟形式纳入医学课程。该形式也有可能进一步发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/fde3994d4890/JME-42-21-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/44275ba385b6/JME-42-21-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/2bd6ac4b56e8/JME-42-21-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/56e362ac578e/JME-42-21-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/fde3994d4890/JME-42-21-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/44275ba385b6/JME-42-21-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/2bd6ac4b56e8/JME-42-21-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/56e362ac578e/JME-42-21-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26a/12131502/fde3994d4890/JME-42-21-g-001.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategy-based evaluation of a formative simulation test assessing professionally relevant competences of undergraduate medical students.基于策略的形成性模拟测试评估本科医学生专业相关能力的研究
GMS J Med Educ. 2025 Apr 15;42(2):Doc21. doi: 10.3205/zma001745. eCollection 2025.
2
Teaching feedback to first-year medical students: long-term skill retention and accuracy of student self-assessment.对医学生一年级学生的教学反馈:长期技能保留和学生自我评估的准确性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):721-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0983-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
3
Validation of Checklists and Evaluation of Clinical Skills in Cases of Abdominal Pain With Simulation in Formative, Objective, Structured Clinical Examination With Audiovisual Content in Third-Year Medical Students' Surgical Clerkship.在第三年医学生外科实习中,使用形成性、客观、结构化临床考试中的模拟病例进行腹痛检查表验证和临床技能评估,同时具有视听内容。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1756-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
4
Medical students' leadership competence in health care: development of a self-assessment scale.医学生医疗领导力:自我评估量表的编制。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1275. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06037-2.
5
Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.对两所本科培养、评估及反馈条件不同的医学院校形成性评估评价的比较。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Jun 15;37(4):Doc41. doi: 10.3205/zma001334. eCollection 2020.
6
A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing.一份关于新型基于计算机的医学病例模拟用于诊断实验室检测的教学和形成性评估的试点报告。
Med Educ Online. 2011 Jan 14;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.5646.
7
[Mentoring and workplace-based assessments for final year medical students : An effective way to increase satisfaction and competence?].[针对医学专业最后一年学生的指导与基于工作场所的评估:提高满意度和能力的有效途径?]
Anaesthesist. 2021 Jun;70(6):486-496. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00902-7. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
A Standardized Clinical Case-Based Assessment for Evaluating Medical Students' Oral Spanish Communication Skills.一种用于评估医学生西班牙语口语交流技能的标准化临床病例评估方法。
MedEdPORTAL. 2025 Apr 17;21:11518. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11518. eCollection 2025.
9
Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.基于能力的学生生成式多项选择题形成性进展测试的开发:多中心试点研究结果
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Oct 15;32(4):Doc46. doi: 10.3205/zma000988. eCollection 2015.
10
Evaluation of high-fidelity and virtual reality simulation platforms for assessing fourth-year medical students' encounters with patients in need of urgent or emergent care.评估高保真和虚拟现实模拟平台,以评估四年级医学生在处理需要紧急或紧急护理的患者时的表现。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2382947. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2382947. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Position statement of the GMA committee "teaching evaluation".德国医师公会“教学评估”委员会立场声明。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Apr 15;41(2):Doc19. doi: 10.3205/zma001674. eCollection 2024.
2
The double-edged sword of emotions in medical education: A scoping review.医学教育中情感的双刃剑:一项范围综述
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Feb 28;12:52. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_644_21. eCollection 2023.
3
Fostering Adaptive Expertise Through Simulation.通过模拟培养适应型专长。
Acad Med. 2023 Sep 1;98(9):994-1001. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005257. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Validation of the ComCare index for rater-based assessment of medical communication and interpersonal skills.基于评分者的医疗沟通和人际技能评估量表 ComCare 指数的验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1004-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.051. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Evaluation of a telemedicine-based training for final-year medical students including simulated patient consultations, documentation, and case presentation.基于远程医疗的培训对医学生最后一年的评估,包括模拟患者咨询、记录和病例汇报。
GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;37(7):Doc94. doi: 10.3205/zma001387. eCollection 2020.
6
A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education.教育领域中的适应专长的范围综述。
Med Teach. 2021 Mar;43(3):347-355. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Validation of a competence-based assessment of medical students' performance in the physician's role.基于能力的医学生医师角色表现评估的验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 7;20(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1919-x.
8
Competencies for first year residents - physicians' views from medical schools with different undergraduate curricula.一年级住院医师的能力——来自本科课程不同的医学院的医生观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 7;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0998-9.
9
The ELEPHANT criteria in medical education: can medical education be fun?医学教育中的 ELEPHANT 标准:医学教育可以有趣吗?
Med Teach. 2010;32(3):195-7. doi: 10.3109/01421591003614866.
10
Enhancing evaluation in an undergraduate medical education program.加强本科医学教育项目中的评估。
Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):787-93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817eb8ab.