Thirumarpan Krishnal, Robinson Elizabeth J Z
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Eastern University, Sri Lanka.
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom.
Eco Environ Health. 2025 Apr 28;4(2):100151. doi: 10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100151. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Though a rich literature addresses the theory of park pricing, less attention has been paid to the practical realities. In this narrative review article, we ask why the setting of national park entry fees varies in practice, and we link this back to the underlying theory, the empirical academic literature, and practical realities. Park entry pricing strategies tend to differ considerably in higher and lower-income countries, reflecting practical realities of how to fund a national park system. Parks in higher-income countries are often free at the point of entry, consistent with the efficient pricing of global public goods. In contrast, differential pricing for local and foreign tourists is common in lower-income countries, an example of price discrimination that increases overall park revenues. We highlight a number of areas for further research. First, the concept of fairness and equitable access is an important practical consideration, linked to who benefits from visiting parks versus who pays, but much more attention needs to be paid to this in the literature. Second, while there is increasing recognition of the importance of green spaces for health and well-being, the literature largely ignores how health considerations might influence park entry fees, suggesting that more research is needed at the nexus of pricing, health and well-being, and equitable access. Finally, many lower-income countries that have a high dependence on foreign visitor fees to fund their national park systems are vulnerable to global shocks, suggesting research is needed into how to increase long-term sustainability of funding sources.
尽管有丰富的文献探讨了公园定价理论,但对实际情况的关注较少。在这篇叙述性综述文章中,我们探究了为什么国家公园门票的定价在实际中存在差异,并将其与基础理论、实证学术文献以及实际情况联系起来。公园门票定价策略在高收入国家和低收入国家往往有很大不同,这反映了为国家公园系统筹集资金的实际情况。高收入国家的公园通常在入园时免费,这与全球公共物品的有效定价相一致。相比之下,低收入国家对本地和外国游客实行差别定价很常见,这是一种价格歧视的例子,可增加公园的总体收入。我们强调了一些有待进一步研究的领域。首先,公平和公平准入的概念是一个重要的实际考量因素,它与谁从参观公园中受益以及谁付费相关,但文献中对此需要给予更多关注。其次,虽然人们越来越认识到绿地对健康和福祉的重要性,但文献在很大程度上忽略了健康因素可能如何影响公园门票价格,这表明在定价、健康与福祉以及公平准入的交叉领域需要更多研究。最后,许多高度依赖外国游客费用来资助其国家公园系统的低收入国家容易受到全球冲击的影响,这表明需要研究如何提高资金来源的长期可持续性。