Mrchkovska Nela, Dolšak Nives, Prakash Aseem
Department of Political Science, Center for Environmental Politics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Sustainability Science, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
NPJ Clim Action. 2023;2(1):10. doi: 10.1038/s44168-023-00040-x. Epub 2023 May 4.
The livestock sector accounts for 14.5% of global greenhouse emissions. Using an online survey experiment ( = 1200) in Italy, we examine respondents' willingness to support a public petition for a meat tax sponsored by a nongovernmental organization (NGO) after priming them with information on the environmental impact of meat and an embedded moral message. Aiming to test whether institutional authority enhances the appeal of the moral message, we include Pope Francis (a religious authority) and a Professor of Philosophy (a secular authority) as the treatment frames along with a no-messenger (control) frame. Overall, support for meat tax is not significant in any of the treatment frames. However, highly religious individuals (those that practice and intensely believe in religion) across denominations and frames are more supportive of the meat tax. Moreover, we also find that there is a slight backlash among highly religious individuals when they receive the message with the Pope as messenger.
畜牧业占全球温室气体排放量的14.5%。我们在意大利进行了一项在线调查实验(n = 1200),在向受访者介绍肉类对环境的影响以及一条内在的道德信息后,考察他们支持由一个非政府组织(NGO)发起的肉类税公开请愿的意愿。为了测试机构权威是否会增强道德信息的吸引力,我们将教皇方济各(宗教权威)和一位哲学教授(世俗权威)作为处理框架,同时设置了无信使(对照)框架。总体而言,在任何一个处理框架中,对肉类税的支持都不显著。然而,不同教派和框架下的高度虔诚的个体(那些践行并强烈信仰宗教的人)更支持肉类税。此外,我们还发现,当高度虔诚的个体收到以教皇为信使的信息时,会出现轻微的抵触情绪。