Aguilar Antonio J, de la Hoz-Torres María L, Costa Nélson, Arezes Pedro, Martínez-Aires María D, Ruiz Diego P
Department of Applied Physics, University of Granada, Av. Severo Ochoa s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.
ALGORITMI Research Center, School of Engineering, University of Minho, Guimarães, 4800-058, Portugal.
J Build Eng. 2022 Jul 1;51:104204. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104204. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
The pandemic caused by COVID-19 has highlighted the need to ensure good indoor air quality. Public buildings (educational buildings in particular) have come under the spotlight because students, teachers and staff spend long periods of the day indoors. This study presents a measurement campaign for the assessment of ventilation rate (VR) and ventilation strategies in educational buildings in Southwestern Europe, Portugal and Spain. A representative sample of the teaching spaces of the Azurém Campus (Guimarães, Portugal) and the Fuentenueva Campus (Granada, Spain) have been analyzed. Natural ventilation is the predominant ventilation strategy in these spaces, being the most common strategy in educational buildings in Europe. VR was estimated under different configurations, using the CO decay method. Subsequently, the CO concentration was estimated according to occupancy and the probability of infection risk was calculated using the Wells-Riley equation. The obtained VR varied between 2.9 and 20.1 air change per hour (ACH) for natural cross ventilation, 2.0 to 5.1 ACH for single-sided ventilation and 1.8 to 3.5 for mechanically ventilated classrooms. Large differences in CO concentrations were verified, depending on the analyzed ventilation strategy, ranging from 475 to 3903 ppm for the different scenarios. However, the probability of risk was less than 1% in almost all of the classrooms analyzed. The results obtained from the measurement campaign showed that the selection of an appropriate ventilation strategy can provide sufficient air renewal and maintain a low risk of infection. Ventilation strategies need to be reconsidered as a consequence of the health emergency arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
由新冠病毒(COVID-19)引发的大流行凸显了确保良好室内空气质量的必要性。公共建筑(尤其是教育建筑)受到了关注,因为学生、教师和工作人员一天中大部分时间都在室内。本研究开展了一项测量活动,以评估欧洲西南部葡萄牙和西班牙教育建筑的通风率(VR)及通风策略。对阿祖雷姆校区(葡萄牙吉马良斯)和富恩特努埃瓦校区(西班牙格拉纳达)教学空间的代表性样本进行了分析。自然通风是这些空间的主要通风策略,也是欧洲教育建筑中最常见的策略。使用CO衰减法在不同配置下估算了通风率。随后,根据 occupancy 估算了CO浓度,并使用威尔斯 - 莱利方程计算了感染风险概率。对于自然交叉通风,获得的通风率在每小时2.9至20.1次换气(ACH)之间;对于单侧通风,为2.0至5.1 ACH;对于机械通风教室,为1.8至3.5 ACH。根据所分析的通风策略,验证了CO浓度存在很大差异,不同场景下浓度范围为475至3903 ppm。然而,在几乎所有分析的教室中,风险概率均小于1%。测量活动获得的结果表明,选择合适的通风策略可以提供充足的空气更新并维持低感染风险。由于COVID-19大流行引发的健康紧急情况,通风策略需要重新考虑。