• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于数字素养的系统综述。

A systematic review on digital literacy.

作者信息

Tinmaz Hasan, Lee Yoo-Taek, Fanea-Ivanovici Mina, Baber Hasnan

机构信息

AI & Big Data Department, Endicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea.

Endicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Daejeon, South Korea.

出版信息

Smart Learn Environ. 2022;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y
PMID:40478098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9175160/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discover the main themes and categories of the research studies regarding digital literacy. To serve this purpose, the databases of WoS/Clarivate Analytics, Proquest Central, Emerald Management Journals, Jstor Business College Collections and Scopus/Elsevier were searched with four keyword-combinations and final forty-three articles were included in the dataset. The researchers applied a systematic literature review method to the dataset. The preliminary findings demonstrated that there is a growing prevalence of digital literacy articles starting from the year 2013. The dominant research methodology of the reviewed articles is qualitative. The four major themes revealed from the qualitative content analysis are: digital literacy, digital competencies, digital skills and digital thinking. Under each theme, the categories and their frequencies are analysed. Recommendations for further research and for real life implementations are generated.

摘要

本研究的目的是发现有关数字素养的研究的主要主题和类别。为实现这一目的,使用四个关键词组合在Web of Science/科睿唯安分析数据库、Proquest Central数据库、Emerald管理期刊数据库、Jstor商学院文集数据库和Scopus/爱思唯尔数据库中进行了检索,最终有43篇文章被纳入数据集。研究人员对该数据集采用了系统文献综述方法。初步研究结果表明,自2013年起,数字素养相关文章的数量呈上升趋势。所审查文章的主要研究方法是定性研究。定性内容分析揭示的四个主要主题是:数字素养、数字能力、数字技能和数字思维。对每个主题下的类别及其出现频率进行了分析。并提出了进一步研究和实际应用的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29cf/9175160/1f21a31d9e18/40561_2022_204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29cf/9175160/cf8b7ab636b0/40561_2022_204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29cf/9175160/1f21a31d9e18/40561_2022_204_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29cf/9175160/cf8b7ab636b0/40561_2022_204_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29cf/9175160/1f21a31d9e18/40561_2022_204_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review on digital literacy.关于数字素养的系统综述。
Smart Learn Environ. 2022;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
2
A study on managerial leadership in education: A systematic literature review.一项关于教育领域管理领导力的研究:系统文献综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):e16834. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16834. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Forced Migrant Populations: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review.改善被迫迁移人口数字健康素养的干预措施的有效性:一项混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 2;12:e50798. doi: 10.2196/50798.
4
Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021.大学环境中的数字素养:2010年至2021年间实证研究的文献综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:896800. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896800. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluating digital libraries: a systematised review.评价数字图书馆:系统综述。
Health Info Libr J. 2018 Sep;35(3):180-191. doi: 10.1111/hir.12231.
6
Digital Competencies and Training Approaches to Enhance the Capacity of Practitioners to Support the Digital Transformation of Public Health: Rapid Review of Current Recommendations.数字能力和培训方法,以提高从业者支持公共卫生数字化转型的能力:对当前建议的快速审查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Sep 9;10:e52798. doi: 10.2196/52798.
7
Understanding Social Media Literacy: A Systematic Review of the Concept and Its Competences.理解社交媒体素养:概念及其能力的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 20;19(14):8807. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148807.
8
Digital Health Competencies Among Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review.卫生保健专业人员的数字健康能力:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 18;24(8):e36414. doi: 10.2196/36414.
9
Ethnocultural empathy development of future language teachers through digital multiliteracy resources for low-literacy adult migrants.通过针对低文化水平成年移民的数字多素养资源培养未来语言教师的民族文化同理心。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1398457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1398457. eCollection 2024.
10
The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review.本科护理专业学生学术素养的重要性及其与未来专业临床实践的关系:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jan;60:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between digital transformation and digital literacy - an explanatory model: Systematic literature review.数字转型与数字素养之间的关系——一种解释模型:系统文献综述
F1000Res. 2025 Jun 10;13:253. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146991.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing a digital health competency assessment framework for public health services: a Delphi-AHP approach.为公共卫生服务制定数字健康能力评估框架:德尔菲-层次分析法
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 21;13:1634261. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634261. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital literacy across disciplines scale for medical students: development, validation, and analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies.新冠疫情与数字不平等:相互影响及缓解策略
Comput Human Behav. 2020 Oct;111:106424. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Literature reviews vs systematic reviews.文献综述与系统评价
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Apr;39(2):103. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12393.
3
Literature reviews and systematic reviews: what is the difference?
Radiol Technol. 2013 Nov-Dec;85(2):219-22.
医学生跨学科数字素养量表:开发、验证与分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07708-4.
4
The association between network literacy and subjective well-being among middle-aged and older adults.中老年人群网络素养与主观幸福感之间的关联
Front Psychol. 2025 May 29;16:1590622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590622. eCollection 2025.
4
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;20(1):57-9.