• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情之后,对于全球电力脱碳,我们能从2008年金融危机中学到什么?

What can we learn from the 2008 financial crisis for global power decarbonization after COVID-19?

作者信息

Zhang Pengfei, Zhao Xu, Sun Laixiang, Zuo Jian, Wei Wendong, Liu Xi, Peng Xu, Shan Yuli, Li Shuping, Ge Liming, Feng Kuishuang, Li Jiashuo

机构信息

Institute of Blue and Green Development, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China.

Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

出版信息

Fundam Res. 2023 Mar 14;5(3):1221-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.017
PMID:40478951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10010838/
Abstract

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, power generation and the associated CO emissions in major countries have experienced a decline and rebound. Knowledge on how an economic crisis affects the emission dynamics of the power sector would help alleviate the emission rebound in the post-COVID-19 era. In this study, we investigate the mechanism by which the 2008 global financial crisis sways the dynamics of power decarbonization. The method couples the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) and environmentally extended input-output analysis. Results show that, from 2009 to 2011, global power generation increased rapidly at a rate higher than that of GDP, and the related CO emissions and the emission intensity of global electricity supply also rebounded; the rapid economic growth in fossil power-dominated countries (e.g., China, the United States, and India) was the main reason for the growth of electricity related CO emissions; and the fixed capital formation was identified as the major driver of the rebound in global electricity consumption. Lessons from the 2008 financial crisis can provide insights for achieving a low-carbon recovery after the COVID-19 crisis, and specific measures have been proposed, for example, setting electricity consumption standards for infrastructure construction projects to reduce electricity consumption induced by the fixed capital formation, and attaching energy efficiency labels and carbon footprint labels to metal products (e.g., iron and steel, aluminum, and fabricated metal products), large quantities of which are used for fixed capital formation.

摘要

自新冠疫情爆发以来,主要国家的发电量及相关碳排放经历了下降和反弹。了解经济危机如何影响电力部门的排放动态,将有助于缓解后新冠疫情时代的排放反弹。在本研究中,我们探究2008年全球金融危机影响电力部门脱碳动态的机制。该方法结合了对数平均迪氏指数(LMDI)和环境扩展投入产出分析。结果表明,2009年至2011年,全球发电量以高于GDP的速度快速增长,全球电力供应的相关碳排放及排放强度也出现反弹;化石能源主导型国家(如中国、美国和印度)的经济快速增长是电力相关碳排放增加的主要原因;固定资本形成被确定为全球电力消费反弹的主要驱动因素。2008年金融危机的教训可为后新冠疫情危机实现低碳复苏提供借鉴,我们提出了具体措施,例如为基础设施建设项目设定电力消费标准,以减少固定资本形成带来的电力消耗,以及为金属产品(如钢铁、铝和金属制品)贴上能效标签和碳足迹标签,这些金属产品大量用于固定资本形成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/3994768cda26/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/ae095e463033/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/10aa6aba2e42/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/1a733e7e157f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/6e320db46f3c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/58c00620ff6d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/20303837b308/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/3994768cda26/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/ae095e463033/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/10aa6aba2e42/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/1a733e7e157f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/6e320db46f3c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/58c00620ff6d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/20303837b308/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55aa/12167870/3994768cda26/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
What can we learn from the 2008 financial crisis for global power decarbonization after COVID-19?在新冠疫情之后,对于全球电力脱碳,我们能从2008年金融危机中学到什么?
Fundam Res. 2023 Mar 14;5(3):1221-32. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.017.
2
Preventing carbon emission retaliatory rebound post-COVID-19 requires expanding free trade and improving energy efficiency.防止新冠肺炎疫情后碳排放量报复性反弹需要扩大自由贸易和提高能源效率。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141158. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141158. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Carbon emission post-coronavirus: Continual decline or rebound?新冠疫情后的碳排放:持续下降还是反弹?
Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2021 Jun;57:57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Study on the spatial correlation effects and influencing factors of carbon emissions from the electricity industry: a fresh evidence from China.电力行业碳排放的空间相关性效应及影响因素研究:来自中国的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(53):113364-113381. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30327-9. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis.主要国家电力部门的二氧化碳排放:分解分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(7):6814-6825. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1013-z. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Decomposition and decoupling research of Chinese power sector carbon emissions through the consumption accounting principle.基于消费核算原理的中国电力行业碳排放分解与脱钩研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):9080-9096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14278-7. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
7
Decomposition of the site-level energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions of the iron and steel industry.钢铁行业场地级能源消耗与二氧化碳排放的分解
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(11):16511-16529. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32162-y. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
8
Carbon emission intensity of electricity generation in Belt and Road Initiative countries: a benchmarking analysis.“一带一路”倡议国家发电碳排放强度:基准分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 May;26(15):15057-15068. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04860-5. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
China's CO emissions embodied in fixed capital formation and its spatial distribution.中国固定资本形成中隐含的二氧化碳排放及其空间分布。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19970-19990. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08491-z. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
CO emissions in the Middle East: Decoupling and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions, and projection of its future trajectory.中东地区的二氧化碳排放:碳排放的脱钩与分解分析及其未来轨迹预测。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 1;845:157182. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157182. Epub 2022 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing a rebound in carbon intensity post-COVID-19 - lessons learned from the change in carbon intensity before and after the 2008 financial crisis.防止新冠疫情后碳强度反弹——从2008年金融危机前后碳强度变化中吸取的教训
Sustain Prod Consum. 2021 Jul;27:1841-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
1.6 Million transactions replicate distributed PV market slowdown by COVID-19 lockdown.160万笔交易因新冠疫情封锁重现分布式光伏市场放缓情况。
Appl Energy. 2021 Feb 1;283:116341. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116341. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
3
Global economic crisis, energy use, CO emissions, and policy roadmap amid COVID-19.
新冠疫情背景下的全球经济危机、能源使用、碳排放及政策路线图
Sustain Prod Consum. 2021 Apr;26:770-781. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
4
COVID-19 recovery funds dwarf clean energy investment needs.新冠疫情复苏资金使清洁能源投资需求相形见绌。
Science. 2020 Oct 16;370(6514):298-300. doi: 10.1126/science.abc9697.
5
Near-real-time monitoring of global CO emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.近实时全球 CO 排放监测揭示了 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 14;11(1):5172. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7.
6
COVID-19: Impact analysis and recommendations for power sector operation.新型冠状病毒肺炎:电力行业运营的影响分析与建议
Appl Energy. 2020 Dec 1;279:115739. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115739. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
7
Protect global supply chains for low-carbon technologies.保护低碳技术的全球供应链。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7823):28-30. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02499-8.
8
Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China's power system.可再生能源及储能成本的迅速下降加速了中国电力系统的脱碳进程。
Nat Commun. 2020 May 19;11(1):2486. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16184-x.
9
Drivers toward a Low-Carbon Electricity System in China's Provinces.中国各省向低碳电力系统转型的驱动因素。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 May 5;54(9):5774-5782. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00536. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
10
Impact of a Coal-Fired Power Plant Shutdown Campaign on Heavy Metal Emissions in China.燃煤电厂关停行动对中国重金属排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Dec 3;53(23):14063-14069. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04683. Epub 2019 Nov 14.