• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地塞米松抑制试验辅助内源性抑郁症患者选择特定抗抑郁药物。

Dexamethasone suppression test as an aid for selection of specific antidepressant drugs in patients with endogenous depression.

作者信息

Rihmer Z, Arató M, György S, Révai K, Demeter E

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 1985 Sep;18(5):306-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1017386.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1017386
PMID:4048265
Abstract

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and response to two different antidepressant drugs (maprotiline as a specific noradrenergic, and amitriptyline as a predominantly serotoninergic drug) were investigated in 44 endogenously depressed female inpatients. The more anxious and/or agitated patients were mostly treated with amtiriptyline, the non-anxious and retarded patients with maprotiline. It was found that among maprotiline responders (N = 15) there were significantly more abnormal DSTs and postdexamethasone serum cortisol levels were significantly higher than among amitriptyline responders (N = 16). On the other hand, DST abnormalities among amitriptyline non-responders (N = 10) were similar to those among maprotiline responders. The results confirm earlier reports by Brown et al. (1980), Ettigi et al. (1983) and Fraser (1983) and indicate that abnormal DST may identify the "noradrenergic" subtype of endogenous depression and that the DST represents a good way of selecting a specific antidepressant drug for the treatment of endogenously depressed patients.

摘要

对44名内因性抑郁的女性住院患者进行了地塞米松抑制试验(DST)以及对两种不同抗抑郁药物(马普替林作为一种特异性去甲肾上腺素能药物,阿米替林作为一种主要的5-羟色胺能药物)反应的研究。焦虑和/或烦躁的患者大多使用阿米替林治疗,非焦虑和迟滞的患者使用马普替林治疗。结果发现,在马普替林治疗有效的患者(N = 15)中,DST异常的情况明显更多,且地塞米松给药后的血清皮质醇水平显著高于阿米替林治疗有效的患者(N = 16)。另一方面,阿米替林治疗无效的患者(N = 10)中的DST异常情况与马普替林治疗有效的患者相似。这些结果证实了Brown等人(1980年)、Ettigi等人(1983年)和Fraser(1983年)早期的报告,并表明DST异常可能识别出内因性抑郁的“去甲肾上腺素能”亚型,且DST是为内因性抑郁患者选择特定抗抑郁药物的一种好方法。

相似文献

1
Dexamethasone suppression test as an aid for selection of specific antidepressant drugs in patients with endogenous depression.地塞米松抑制试验辅助内源性抑郁症患者选择特定抗抑郁药物。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 1985 Sep;18(5):306-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1017386.
2
Dexamethasone suppression test status does not predict differential response to nortriptyline versus amitriptyline.地塞米松抑制试验结果不能预测对去甲替林和阿米替林的不同反应。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988 Dec;8(6):421-5.
3
Dexamethasone suppression test in primary depression: significance of family history and psychosis.原发性抑郁症的地塞米松抑制试验:家族史和精神病的意义
Biol Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;17(1):41-8.
4
Is the dexamethasone suppression test predictive of response to specific antidepressant treatment in major depression?地塞米松抑制试验能否预测重度抑郁症患者对特定抗抑郁治疗的反应?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987 Aug;76(2):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02874.x.
5
A comparison of the cortisol suppression index and the dexamethasone suppression test.皮质醇抑制指数与地塞米松抑制试验的比较
J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;45(10):431-2.
6
Mianserin and maprotiline as compared to amitriptyline in severe endogenous depression. A new methodological approach to the clinical evaluation of the efficacy of antidepressants.米安色林和马普替林与阿米替林治疗重度内源性抑郁症的比较。一种评估抗抑郁药疗效的临床新方法。
Pharmacopsychiatria. 1982 Nov;15(6):197-204. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019538.
7
Depression after minor closed head injury: role of dexamethasone suppression test and antidepressants.轻度闭合性颅脑损伤后的抑郁:地塞米松抑制试验及抗抑郁药的作用
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;46(8):335-8.
8
Dexamethasone suppression test and treatment response.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Sep;45(9):387-9.
9
Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of maprotiline and amitriptyline in endogenous depression: a double-blind controlled trial.
Clin Ther. 1980;3(4):292-310.
10
Response to dexamethasone in affective disorder outpatients.情感障碍门诊患者对地塞米松的反应。
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1984 May-Jun;84(3):218-27.