Schippers Bente, Coenen Olga, Luk Franka, Graner Mark, van Hoek Frans, Stikkelbroeck Nike, Dronkers Machteld, Bowles Edmée, Tostmann Alma
Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud Community of Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboudumc Health Academy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025 Jun 7;14(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01585-8.
This study aims to analyse the impact of a newly developed infection prevention and control (IPC) Virtual Reality (VR)-module on medical students' IPC knowledge, attitudes and practices. Additionally, the impact of the module on students' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) confidence regarding IPC decision-making and their insight into consequences of IPC decisions were analysed.
The IPC VR-module was developed using a cyclical design process consisting of a prototype, first and final version. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding IPC were compared between two groups of medical students. The VR-module was added to the IPC program for the VR group. After completion of the program, students of both groups were asked to complete an online questionnaire. Scores were summated for each subscale of the KAP, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare scores between groups. Student and HCP responses to VR-specific questions were dichotomized and a chi-square test was used to compare responses to different versions of the module.
Students who completed the VR-module (n = 34) scored higher on IPC knowledge questions (score 8 / 10), than those who followed the regular program (n = 58; score 7/10; p = 0.003). For the final version, the added value of the VR-module in the program was recognized by 95% of students and 90% of HCPs. Students and HCPs who completed the final version of the VR-module agreed more often with learning objectives of the VR-module than those who completed the first version. 100% vs. 80% for the statement on insight into consequences of choices (p < 0.001) and 89% vs. 73% for the statement on confidence taking IPC decisions (p < 0.001).
The innovative IPC VR-module positively impacted students IPC knowledge and was highly appreciated by students and HCPs. VR-specific learning objectives were achieved, especially for the final version of the VR-module, demonstrating the importance of a cyclical design process.
本研究旨在分析新开发的感染预防与控制(IPC)虚拟现实(VR)模块对医学生IPC知识、态度和实践的影响。此外,还分析了该模块对学生和医护人员(HCPs)在IPC决策方面的信心及其对IPC决策后果的洞察力的影响。
IPC VR模块采用由原型、第一版和最终版组成的循环设计流程开发。比较了两组医学生在IPC方面的知识、态度和实践(KAP)。VR组的IPC课程中添加了VR模块。课程结束后,要求两组学生完成一份在线问卷。对KAP的每个子量表的得分进行汇总,进行曼-惠特尼U检验以比较两组得分。将学生和HCP对VR特定问题的回答进行二分法处理,并使用卡方检验比较对模块不同版本的回答。
完成VR模块的学生(n = 34)在IPC知识问题上的得分(8/10分)高于参加常规课程的学生(n = 58;7/10分;p = 0.003)。对于最终版,95%的学生和90%的HCP认可该模块在课程中的附加值。完成VR模块最终版的学生和HCP比完成第一版的学生和HCP更常认同VR模块的学习目标。关于对选择后果的洞察力的陈述为100%对80%(p < 0.001),关于在IPC决策时的信心的陈述为89%对73%(p < 0.001)。
创新的IPC VR模块对学生的IPC知识产生了积极影响,受到学生和HCP的高度评价。实现了VR特定的学习目标,特别是对于VR模块的最终版,证明了循环设计流程的重要性。