Kravitz Meryl B, Dadario Nicholas B, Arif Adeel, Bellido Simon, Arif Amber, Ahmed Oark, Gibber Marc, Jafri Farrukh N
Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, USA.
Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Mar 30;14(3):e23655. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23655. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Introduction Preventing errors in donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) is critical for limiting the spread of infectious diseases. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated itself as an effective tool for asynchronous learning, but its use in PPE training has not been tested. The objective of this study was to compare donning and doffing performance between VR and e-module PPE training. Methods A prospective randomized open-blinded controlled trial was conducted to determine differences in donning and doffing performance after VR and e-module PPE training among medical staff and medical students at a single institution. The primary outcome was donning and doffing performance with real PPE, assessed using a 64-point checklist. The secondary outcome was participant preparedness and confidence level after training. Results Fifty-four participants were randomized, mostly consisting of medical students (n=24 {44%}) or emergency medicine and otolaryngology residents (n=19 {35%}). The VR group (n=27 {50%}) performed better than the control in the overall PPE scores but this was not statistically significant (mean {SD}, VR: 55.4 {4.4} vs e-module: 53.3 {8.1}; p = 0.40). VR participants also reported higher levels of preparedness and confidence after training. Residents as a subgroup achieved the highest increases after VR training compared to their counterparts in the control training group (mean {SD}, VR: 55.6 {4.9} vs e-module 48.4 {5.5}, p = 0.009). Conclusion In this randomized trial, VR training was found to be non-inferior to e-module for asynchronous PPE training. Our results suggest that in particular residents may benefit most from VR PPE training. Additionally, VR participants felt more confident and prepared to don and doff PPE after training compared to e-module participants. These findings are particularly relevant given the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Future studies need to focus on VR integration into residency curriculum and monitoring for long-term skill retention.
引言 预防个人防护装备(PPE)穿脱过程中的失误对于限制传染病传播至关重要。虚拟现实(VR)已证明是一种有效的异步学习工具,但其在PPE培训中的应用尚未得到测试。本研究的目的是比较VR和电子模块PPE培训在穿脱操作方面的表现。方法 进行了一项前瞻性随机开放盲法对照试验,以确定在单一机构中,医务人员和医学生接受VR和电子模块PPE培训后穿脱操作表现的差异。主要结局是使用64分检查表评估的实际PPE穿脱表现。次要结局是培训后参与者的准备情况和信心水平。结果 54名参与者被随机分组,主要包括医学生(n = 24 {44%})或急诊医学和耳鼻喉科住院医师(n = 19 {35%})。VR组(n = 27 {50%})在总体PPE评分上比对照组表现更好,但差异无统计学意义(均值{标准差},VR:55.4 {4.4} 对电子模块:53.3 {8.1};p = 0.40)。VR组参与者在培训后也报告了更高的准备程度和信心。与对照培训组的同行相比,住院医师作为一个亚组在VR培训后取得了最大的进步(均值{标准差},VR:55.6 {4.9} 对电子模块48.4 {5.5},p = 0.009)。结论 在这项随机试验中,发现VR培训在异步PPE培训方面不劣于电子模块培训。我们的结果表明,特别是住院医师可能从VR PPE培训中获益最大。此外,与电子模块组参与者相比,VR组参与者在培训后对穿脱PPE更有信心且准备更充分。鉴于当前的2019冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)大流行,这些发现尤为重要。未来的研究需要专注于将VR融入住院医师课程以及对长期技能保持情况的监测。