• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作系统控制层级:护理人员制定的风险控制分析

A Work Systems Hierarchy of Controls: Analysis of Risk Controls Developed by Paramedics.

作者信息

Davies Karen, Weale Victoria, Oakman Jodi

机构信息

Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2025 Aug;68(8):698-710. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23741. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1002/ajim.23741
PMID:40495295
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hierarchy of control (HOC) is a fundamental construct in work health and safety practice and central for employers to manage risk to the health and safety of workers in Australia, to fulfil their legal obligations. The current HOC has been identified as more effective for developing risk controls for physical hazards than for psychosocial hazards.

METHODS

To address this limitation, this study involved development and testing of a more comprehensive hierarchy of risk control. The work systems hierarchy of control (WS-HOC) includes three hierarchical levels; elimination, re-design of systems and individual actions. Non-hierarchical categories within levels were developed to distinguish different risk control options, suitable for both physical and psychosocial hazards. Using the WS-HOC, risk controls developed by paramedics to address physical and psychosocial hazards associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were analyzed. These risk controls were developed using the APHIRM (A Participative Hazard Identification and Risk Management) toolkit in an ambulance service.

RESULTS

The WS-HOC provided a single, contemporary, nuanced approach to evaluating the risk controls for paramedics and their likely effectiveness, regardless of the type of hazard.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel approach provides an alternative to previous attempts at supplementing the HOC to improve its application to psychosocial hazards. Further evaluation is required by both practitioners and researchers to examine its utility for other, different occupations.

摘要

背景

控制层级(HOC)是工作健康与安全实践中的一个基本概念,对于澳大利亚雇主管理工人健康与安全风险以履行其法律义务至关重要。目前已确定,HOC在制定物理危害的风险控制措施方面比心理社会危害更为有效。

方法

为解决这一局限性,本研究涉及开发和测试一个更全面的风险控制层级。工作系统控制层级(WS-HOC)包括三个层次级别:消除、系统重新设计和个体行动。各层级内的非层次类别被开发出来,以区分适用于物理和心理社会危害的不同风险控制选项。使用WS-HOC,分析了护理人员为应对与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病相关的物理和心理社会危害而制定的风险控制措施。这些风险控制措施是在一家救护车服务机构中使用APHIRM(参与式危害识别与风险管理)工具包制定的。

结果

WS-HOC提供了一种单一、现代、细致入微的方法来评估护理人员的风险控制措施及其可能的有效性,而不论危害类型如何。

结论

这种新颖的方法为以往补充HOC以改善其在心理社会危害方面应用的尝试提供了一种替代方案。从业者和研究人员都需要进一步评估,以检验其在其他不同职业中的效用。

相似文献

1
A Work Systems Hierarchy of Controls: Analysis of Risk Controls Developed by Paramedics.工作系统控制层级:护理人员制定的风险控制分析
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Aug;68(8):698-710. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23741. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub2.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
[LOW BACK PAIN AT NEW WORKING AMBIENT IN ERA OF NEW ECONOMY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ABOUT OCCUPATIONAL RISK FACTORS].[新经济时代新工作环境下的腰痛:关于职业风险因素的系统评价]
Acta Med Croatica. 2015 Mar;69(1):49-58.
10
Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.用于管理1型糖尿病患者血糖水平的混合闭环系统:系统评价与经济建模
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190. doi: 10.3310/JYPL3536.

本文引用的文献

1
The Psychosocial Hierarchy of Controls: Effectively Reducing Psychosocial Hazards at Work.心理社会控制层次结构:有效减少工作中的心理社会危害。
Am J Ind Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):250-263. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23694. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
What is needed to address psychosocial hazards in road transport? Using implementation science to understand the gaps.解决道路运输中社会心理危害需要什么?利用实施科学来了解差距。
Appl Ergon. 2025 Jan;122:104398. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104398. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
An urgent call to address work-related psychosocial hazards and improve worker well-being.
呼吁紧急解决工作相关的心理社会危害,改善工人福祉。
Am J Ind Med. 2024 Jun;67(6):499-514. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23583. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
A participatory ergonomics intervention to re-design work and improve the musculoskeletal health of paramedics: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.参与式人体工效学干预措施重新设计工作并改善护理人员的肌肉骨骼健康:一项群组随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Sep 8;24(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06834-8.
5
Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations.心理社会危害因素在区分高风险职业中劳动者的 MSD 风险水平方面起着关键作用。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Oct;112:104053. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Mental Health Symptoms and Workplace Challenges among Australian Paramedics during the COVID-19 Pandemic.澳大利亚医护人员在新冠疫情期间的心理健康症状和工作场所挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 17;19(2):1004. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19021004.
7
Emergency management as a complex adaptive system.作为一个复杂适应系统的应急管理。
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2021 Jan 1;14(4):354-368.
8
State of science: the future of work - ergonomics and human factors contributions to the field.科学现状:工作的未来——人类工效学和人体因素对该领域的贡献。
Ergonomics. 2021 Apr;64(4):427-439. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1841308. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Exploring the need for and application of human factors and ergonomics in ambulance design: Overcoming the barriers with technical standards.探索人体因素与工效学在救护车设计中的需求及应用:借助技术标准克服障碍
Appl Ergon. 2020 Oct;88:103144. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103144. Epub 2020 May 22.
10
The APHIRM toolkit: an evidence-based system for workplace MSD risk management.APHIRM 工具包:基于证据的工作场所 MSD 风险管理系统。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2828-1.