Suppr超能文献

工作系统控制层级:护理人员制定的风险控制分析

A Work Systems Hierarchy of Controls: Analysis of Risk Controls Developed by Paramedics.

作者信息

Davies Karen, Weale Victoria, Oakman Jodi

机构信息

Centre for Ergonomics and Human Factors, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Queensland Ambulance Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Ind Med. 2025 Aug;68(8):698-710. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23741. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hierarchy of control (HOC) is a fundamental construct in work health and safety practice and central for employers to manage risk to the health and safety of workers in Australia, to fulfil their legal obligations. The current HOC has been identified as more effective for developing risk controls for physical hazards than for psychosocial hazards.

METHODS

To address this limitation, this study involved development and testing of a more comprehensive hierarchy of risk control. The work systems hierarchy of control (WS-HOC) includes three hierarchical levels; elimination, re-design of systems and individual actions. Non-hierarchical categories within levels were developed to distinguish different risk control options, suitable for both physical and psychosocial hazards. Using the WS-HOC, risk controls developed by paramedics to address physical and psychosocial hazards associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were analyzed. These risk controls were developed using the APHIRM (A Participative Hazard Identification and Risk Management) toolkit in an ambulance service.

RESULTS

The WS-HOC provided a single, contemporary, nuanced approach to evaluating the risk controls for paramedics and their likely effectiveness, regardless of the type of hazard.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel approach provides an alternative to previous attempts at supplementing the HOC to improve its application to psychosocial hazards. Further evaluation is required by both practitioners and researchers to examine its utility for other, different occupations.

摘要

背景

控制层级(HOC)是工作健康与安全实践中的一个基本概念,对于澳大利亚雇主管理工人健康与安全风险以履行其法律义务至关重要。目前已确定,HOC在制定物理危害的风险控制措施方面比心理社会危害更为有效。

方法

为解决这一局限性,本研究涉及开发和测试一个更全面的风险控制层级。工作系统控制层级(WS-HOC)包括三个层次级别:消除、系统重新设计和个体行动。各层级内的非层次类别被开发出来,以区分适用于物理和心理社会危害的不同风险控制选项。使用WS-HOC,分析了护理人员为应对与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病相关的物理和心理社会危害而制定的风险控制措施。这些风险控制措施是在一家救护车服务机构中使用APHIRM(参与式危害识别与风险管理)工具包制定的。

结果

WS-HOC提供了一种单一、现代、细致入微的方法来评估护理人员的风险控制措施及其可能的有效性,而不论危害类型如何。

结论

这种新颖的方法为以往补充HOC以改善其在心理社会危害方面应用的尝试提供了一种替代方案。从业者和研究人员都需要进一步评估,以检验其在其他不同职业中的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验