• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导更安全尼古丁产品的消费者组织全球调查。

Global survey of consumer organizations advocating for safer nicotine products.

作者信息

Jerzyński Tomasz, Harding Jessica, Stimson Gerry V

机构信息

Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland.

Knowledge Action Change London UK.

出版信息

Public Health Chall. 2023 Jan 19;2(1):e58. doi: 10.1002/puh2.58. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/puh2.58
PMID:40496959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039648/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study investigated the role and activities of organizations that advocate for the adoption of and access to safer nicotine products (SNPs), such as nicotine vaping products (e-cigarettes), Swedish-style snus, nontobacco nicotine pouches, and heated tobacco products, as safer alternatives to combustible cigarettes and other high-risk tobacco products, following a harm reduction approach. The aim was to map the number and locations of nicotine consumer organizations globally and describe their history, legal status, membership, structure, objectives, working methods and activities, and funding.

METHODS

We identified active organizations through the use of existing networks and referrals. All identified organizations were contacted and asked to fill in an online self-completion survey through the representatives of the organizations. The data collected were cleaned and anonymized. Categorization and analysis of variable distributions were carried out. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed qualitatively.

RESULTS

A total of 52 active organizations were identified: 13 in Latin America, 8 in Africa, 24 in Europe, 5 in the Asia-Pacific region, and 2 in North America. Most were established from 2016 onward, and 39 were legally incorporated. Their reported objectives were to raise awareness about SNP, promote rights to access SNP, and advocate for a legal and regulatory environment in which SNPs are available. They are small organizations: Most are operated with volunteers, with only 7 having any contracted or paid staff, and only 13 persons globally with a paid position. A total of 31 organizations had not received any funding support. The total global funding for all organizations was US$ 309,810. None reported receiving funding from tobacco or pharmaceutical companies. All pointed to important achievements in the public debate about SNP and tobacco harm reduction.

CONCLUSION

The organizations are run by enthusiastic individuals, most of whom have successfully quit smoking with the help of SNP. Organizations depend on the input of a small number of core workers, all organizations are under-resourced and potentially fragile, and yet, they report significant activity and success. The challenge for these groups is to gain recognition at national and international level as legitimate stakeholders in the development of tobacco control policy with respect to safer alternatives to smoking.

摘要

引言

本研究调查了倡导采用和获取更安全尼古丁产品(SNP)的组织的作用和活动,这些产品包括尼古丁雾化产品(电子烟)、瑞典式口含烟、非烟草尼古丁袋和加热烟草产品,它们是遵循减少危害方法的可燃香烟和其他高风险烟草产品的更安全替代品。目的是梳理全球尼古丁消费者组织的数量和地点,并描述其历史、法律地位、成员、结构、目标、工作方法和活动以及资金情况。

方法

我们通过现有网络和推荐来识别活跃组织。联系了所有识别出的组织,并要求它们通过组织代表填写一份在线自填式调查问卷。收集到的数据经过清理和匿名处理。对变量分布进行了分类和分析。对开放式问题的回答进行了定性分析。

结果

共识别出52个活跃组织:拉丁美洲13个、非洲8个、欧洲24个、亚太地区5个、北美洲2个。大多数组织是2016年以后成立的,39个组织进行了合法注册。它们宣称的目标是提高对SNP的认识、促进获取SNP的权利,并倡导建立一个SNP可获取的法律和监管环境。这些组织规模较小:大多数由志愿者运营,只有7个组织有签约或付费员工,全球仅有13人有带薪职位。共有31个组织未获得任何资金支持。所有组织的全球资金总额为309,810美元。没有组织报告从烟草或制药公司获得资金。所有组织都指出在关于SNP和烟草危害减少的公众辩论中取得了重要成果。

结论

这些组织由热情的个人运营,他们中的大多数在SNP的帮助下成功戒烟。组织依赖少数核心工作人员的投入,所有组织资源不足且可能较为脆弱,但它们报告了显著的活动和成功。这些团体面临的挑战是在国家和国际层面被认可为烟草控制政策制定中关于更安全吸烟替代品的合法利益相关者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fd/12039648/fcc04eca35fb/PUH2-2-e58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fd/12039648/fcc04eca35fb/PUH2-2-e58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9fd/12039648/fcc04eca35fb/PUH2-2-e58-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Global survey of consumer organizations advocating for safer nicotine products.倡导更安全尼古丁产品的消费者组织全球调查。
Public Health Chall. 2023 Jan 19;2(1):e58. doi: 10.1002/puh2.58. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Effects of reduced-risk nicotine-delivery products on smoking prevalence and cigarette sales: an observational study.降低风险尼古丁传递产品对吸烟率和香烟销售的影响:一项观察性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Sep;11(7):1-39. doi: 10.3310/RPDN7327.
3
Bridging the Gap in Smoking Cessation: Unveiling Tobacco Harm Reduction in Pakistan Through Print Media Content Analysis.弥合戒烟差距:通过印刷媒体内容分析揭示巴基斯坦的烟草危害减少情况
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Mar 26;2025:3822509. doi: 10.1155/bmri/3822509. eCollection 2025.
4
[Harm reduction strategy in tobacco control].[烟草控制中的减少危害策略]
Epidemiol Prev. 2011 May-Aug;35(3-4 Suppl 1):19-32.
5
Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote "Harm Reduction" Products?: The Role of Competition.烟草公司是否有激励推广“减害”产品?竞争的作用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Nov 22;25(12):1810-1821. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad014.
6
Interventions for quitting vaping.戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 8;1(1):CD016058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016058.pub2.
7
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
8
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021.中学生使用烟草制品及相关因素 - 2021 年美国全国青少年烟草调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Mar 11;71(5):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1.
9
Clinical study protocol on electronic cigarettes and nicotine pouches for smoking cessation in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial.电子香烟和尼古丁袋在巴基斯坦戒烟的临床研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Jan 2;25(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07876-y.
10
Patterns of Non-Cigarette Tobacco and Nicotine Use Among Current Cigarette Smokers and Recent Quitters: Findings From the 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.当前吸烟者和近期戒烟者中非香烟烟草和尼古丁使用模式:来自 2020 年 ITC 四国吸烟和电子烟调查的发现。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 18;23(9):1611-1616. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab040.

本文引用的文献

1
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.
2
Estimation of the global number of e-cigarette users in 2020.估算 2020 年全球电子烟用户数量。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Oct 23;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00556-7.
3
The New Nicotine Pouch Category: A Tobacco Harm Reduction Tool?新型尼古丁袋:一种减害烟草工具?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):623-625. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab198.
4
A first pass, using pre-history and contemporary history, at understanding why Australia and England have such different policies towards electronic nicotine delivery systems, 1970s-c. 2018.从历史的角度来看,了解为什么澳大利亚和英国对电子烟的政策在 1970 年代至 2018 年期间有如此大的差异。
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2577-2585. doi: 10.1111/add.15391. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Successful countering of tobacco industry efforts to overturn Thailand's ENDS ban.成功抵制烟草业推翻泰国电子烟禁令的努力。
Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(e1):e10-e19. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056058. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
6
Exploring the Twitter activity around the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.探索围绕世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》缔约方会议第八届会议的推特活动。
Tob Control. 2022 Jan;31(1):50-56. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055889. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Co-optation of harm reduction by Big Tobacco.大烟草公司对减少伤害理念的盗用。
Tob Control. 2021 Nov;30(e1):e1-e3. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056059. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
8
Tobacco harm reduction: Past history, current controversies and a proposed approach for the future.烟草危害降低:过去的历史、当前的争议以及未来的建议方法。
Prev Med. 2020 Nov;140:106099. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106099. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Financial Conflicts of Interest and Stance on Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Systematic Review.财务利益冲突与对烟草减害立场:系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jul;109(7):e1-e8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305106. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Balancing science and political economy: Tobacco control and global health.平衡科学与政治经济:烟草控制与全球健康
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Apr 12;3:40. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14362.1. eCollection 2018.