Robertson Lindsay, Joshi Ayush, Legg Tess, Wellock Georgina, Ray Katerina, Evans-Reeves Karen
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago Division of Health Sciences, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tob Control. 2022 Jan;31(1):50-56. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055889. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Tobacco companies' intentions to influence the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) via the Conference of Parties (COP; the official biannual meeting where Parties review the Convention) are well documented. We aimed to analyse Twitter data to gain insights into tobacco industry tactics, arguments and allies.
We retrieved 9089 tweets that included #COP8FCTC between 1 and 9 October 2018. We categorised the tweets' content and sentiment through manual coding and machine learning. We used an investigative procedure using publicly available information to categorise the most active Twitter users and investigate tobacco industry links. Network analysis was used to visualise interactions and detect communities.
Most tweets were about next-generation products (NGPs) or 'harm reduction' (54%) and tended to argue in support of NGPs; around one-quarter were critical of tobacco control (24%). The largest proportion of most active tweeters were NGP advocates, and slightly over half of those had either links to the Philip Morris International (PMI) funded Foundation for a Smoke-Free World (FSFW) and/or to the International Network of Nicotine Consumer Organisations, a network to whom the FSFW granted US$100 300 in 2018. PMI was the most active transnational tobacco company during COP8.
The nature of the activity on Twitter around COP8, including a substantial online presence by PMI executives and NGP advocates with links to organisations funded directly and indirectly by PMI, is highly consistent with PMI's 2014 corporate affairs strategy, which described engaging tobacco harm reduction advocates to 'amplify and leverage the debate on harm reduction' around events such as the COP.
烟草公司意图通过缔约方会议(COP;缔约方审查《公约》的官方半年一次会议)影响世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC),这已被充分记录在案。我们旨在分析推特数据,以深入了解烟草行业的策略、论点和盟友。
我们检索了2018年10月1日至9日期间包含#COP8FCTC的9089条推文。我们通过人工编码和机器学习对推文内容和情绪进行分类。我们使用一种调查程序,利用公开信息对最活跃的推特用户进行分类,并调查烟草行业的联系。网络分析用于可视化互动并检测社群。
大多数推文是关于下一代产品(NGP)或“减少危害”(54%),并且倾向于支持NGP;约四分之一的推文对烟草控制持批评态度(24%)。最活跃的推特用户中最大比例是NGP倡导者,其中略超过一半与菲利普·莫里斯国际公司(PMI)资助的无烟世界基金会(FSFW)和/或尼古丁消费者组织国际网络有联系,FSFW在2018年向该网络提供了100300美元。PMI是COP8期间最活跃的跨国烟草公司。
围绕COP8在推特上的活动性质,包括PMI高管和与PMI直接或间接资助的组织有联系的NGP倡导者大量在线参与,与PMI 2014年的企业事务战略高度一致,该战略描述了让烟草危害减少倡导者参与,以“在COP等活动周围扩大和利用关于减少危害的辩论”。