• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在基于模型的方法中实现阶梯式楔形试验中的模型稳健推断?

How to achieve model-robust inference in stepped wedge trials with model-based methods?

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520, United States.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae123.

DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae123
PMID:39499239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11536888/
Abstract

A stepped wedge design is an unidirectional crossover design where clusters are randomized to distinct treatment sequences. While model-based analysis of stepped wedge designs is a standard practice to evaluate treatment effects accounting for clustering and adjusting for covariates, their properties under misspecification have not been systematically explored. In this article, we focus on model-based methods, including linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations with an independence, simple exchangeable, or nested exchangeable working correlation structure. We study when a potentially misspecified working model can offer consistent estimation of the marginal treatment effect estimands, which are defined nonparametrically with potential outcomes and may be functions of calendar time and/or exposure time. We prove a central result that consistency for nonparametric estimands usually requires a correctly specified treatment effect structure, but generally not the remaining aspects of the working model (functional form of covariates, random effects, and error distribution), and valid inference is obtained via the sandwich variance estimator. Furthermore, an additional g-computation step is required to achieve model-robust inference under non-identity link functions or for ratio estimands. The theoretical results are illustrated via several simulation experiments and re-analysis of a completed stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

摘要

阶梯式楔形设计是一种单向交叉设计,其中集群被随机分配到不同的治疗序列。虽然基于模型的阶梯式楔形设计分析是评估治疗效果的标准方法,可考虑聚类并调整协变量,但它们在指定不当的情况下的特性尚未得到系统探索。在本文中,我们专注于基于模型的方法,包括线性混合模型和广义估计方程,具有独立性、简单交换或嵌套交换的工作相关结构。我们研究了潜在的指定不当的工作模型如何能够提供边缘治疗效果估计值的一致估计,这些估计值是通过潜在结果非参数定义的,并且可能是日历时间和/或暴露时间的函数。我们证明了一个中心结果,即对于非参数估计值,一致性通常需要正确指定治疗效果结构,但通常不需要工作模型的其余方面(协变量的函数形式、随机效应和误差分布),并且通过三明治方差估计器可以获得有效推断。此外,在非恒等链接函数或比率估计值的情况下,需要进行额外的 g 计算步骤以实现模型稳健推断。通过几个模拟实验和已完成的阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的重新分析来说明理论结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/174cb90fdecf/ujae123fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/ff464a581d65/ujae123fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/b505d72e0464/ujae123fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/c901e3782aa4/ujae123fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/174cb90fdecf/ujae123fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/ff464a581d65/ujae123fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/b505d72e0464/ujae123fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/c901e3782aa4/ujae123fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d1a/11536888/174cb90fdecf/ujae123fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
How to achieve model-robust inference in stepped wedge trials with model-based methods?如何在基于模型的方法中实现阶梯式楔形试验中的模型稳健推断?
Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae123.
2
Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures.在随机效应结构指定不当的阶段式楔形群组随机试验中,维持线性混合模型推论的有效性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):1497-1516. doi: 10.1177/09622802241248382. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.具有二元结局的横断面阶梯楔形整群随机试验的最小聚类数及分析方法比较:一项模拟研究
Trials. 2017 Mar 9;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1862-2.
4
Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯楔形整群随机试验中总体平均治疗效果的有限样本校正广义估计方程
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):583-597. doi: 10.1177/0962280214552092. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
The fixed-effects model for robust analysis of stepped-wedge cluster trials with a small number of clusters and continuous outcomes: a simulation study.稳健分析带有少量群组和连续结局的阶乘式群组试验的固定效应模型:一项模拟研究。
Trials. 2024 Oct 25;25(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08572-1.
6
Robust inference for the stepped wedge design.稳健推断的阶跃楔形设计。
Biometrics. 2020 Mar;76(1):119-130. doi: 10.1111/biom.13106. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
7
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
8
Random effect misspecification in stepped wedge designs.随机效应在阶梯式楔形设计中的误设。
Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;19(4):380-383. doi: 10.1177/17407745221084702. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
9
Optimal designs using generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized crossover and stepped wedge trials.使用广义估计方程的最优设计在群组随机交叉和阶梯楔形试验中。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Aug;33(8):1299-1330. doi: 10.1177/09622802241247717. Epub 2024 May 30.
10
Bias and inference from misspecified mixed-effect models in stepped wedge trial analysis.阶梯楔形试验分析中错误设定的混合效应模型的偏差与推断
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 15;36(23):3670-3682. doi: 10.1002/sim.7348. Epub 2017 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer and Patient Feedback to Increase Adherence to Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.同伴及患者反馈以提高术后阿片类药物处方指南的依从性:一项阶梯楔形整群随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1672.
2
How Should Parallel Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Period be Analyzed?-A Survey of Estimands and Common Estimators.具有基线期的平行整群随机试验应如何分析?——对估计量和常用估计方法的调查
Biom J. 2025 Jun;67(3):e70052. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70052.
3
What Is a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial?

本文引用的文献

1
Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures.在随机效应结构指定不当的阶段式楔形群组随机试验中,维持线性混合模型推论的有效性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):1497-1516. doi: 10.1177/09622802241248382. Epub 2024 May 29.
2
Adherence to key recommendations for design and analysis of stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: A review of trials published 2016-2022.遵守 stepped-wedge 群随机对照试验设计和分析的关键建议:对 2016-2022 年发表的试验的回顾。
Clin Trials. 2024 Apr;21(2):199-210. doi: 10.1177/17407745231208397. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
什么是阶梯楔形整群随机试验?
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 1;185(5):593-594. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8216.
4
Analysis of Cohort Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trials With Nonignorable Dropout via Joint Modeling.通过联合建模对具有不可忽略失访的队列阶梯楔形整群随机试验进行分析。
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e10347. doi: 10.1002/sim.10347.
Information content of stepped wedge designs under the working independence assumption.
工作独立性假设下阶梯楔形设计的信息含量
J Stat Plan Inference. 2024 Mar;229. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106097. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
4
Assessing exposure-time treatment effect heterogeneity in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.评估阶梯式楔形群随机试验中暴露时间治疗效果的异质性。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2551-2564. doi: 10.1111/biom.13803. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.在整群随机临床试验中的估算指标:选择回答正确问题的分析方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):107-118. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac131.
6
Analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials in the presence of a time-varying treatment effect.存在时变治疗效果时的阶梯式楔形集群随机试验分析。
Stat Med. 2022 Sep 30;41(22):4311-4339. doi: 10.1002/sim.9511. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
7
Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验:方法概述。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.136.
8
Model misspecification in stepped wedge trials: Random effects for time or treatment.阶段型楔形试验中的模型误设:时间或处理的随机效应。
Stat Med. 2022 May 10;41(10):1751-1766. doi: 10.1002/sim.9326. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
9
Inference for the treatment effect in longitudinal cluster randomized trials when treatment effect heterogeneity is ignored.当忽略治疗效果异质性时,纵向聚类随机试验中治疗效果的推断。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):2503-2525. doi: 10.1177/09622802211041754. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.