• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将性别医学融入现代医疗保健:进展与障碍。

Integrating gender medicine into modern healthcare: Progress and barriers.

作者信息

Fuentes Artiles Rubén, Gebhard Caroline E, Gebhard Catherine

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Oct;55(10):e70089. doi: 10.1111/eci.70089. Epub 2025 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1111/eci.70089
PMID:40501433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12434427/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sex and gender are fundamental determinants of health, influencing disease risk, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes across medical disciplines. While sex refers to biological characteristics, gender encompasses sociocultural dimensions, including behaviours and identities.

RESULTS

The field of gender medicine has evolved significantly from its roots in the women's health movement of the 1960s and 1970s, which initially sought to address reproductive rights and the systematic exclusion of women from clinical research. Over time, the focus has expanded to recognize sex- and gender-based differences in all populations, including men and gender-diverse individuals. Despite progress, persistent challenges remain. Many clinical guidelines inadequately incorporate sex and gender considerations, and women continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in suboptimal efficacy and a higher incidence of adverse effects in women. Recent initiatives, including government-funded research programs, specialized gender medicine professorships and regulatory measures promoting equitable clinical trial participation, represent positive steps forward. However, a systematic, interdisciplinary approach is required to fully integrate gender-sensitive medicine into research, education and clinical practice. This narrative review explores the historical development of gender medicine, current advancements and remaining challenges. We highlight the need for improved research methodologies, policy changes and targeted interventions to ensure equitable healthcare. A structured action plan emphasizing regulatory support, education, industry involvement and public awareness is essential to accelerate the field's integration.

CONCLUSION

Recognising and addressing sex- and gender-sensitive health differences will lead to more personalised and effective medical care, ultimately improving health outcomes for all individuals.

摘要

背景

性别是健康的基本决定因素,影响着各个医学学科的疾病风险、诊断、治疗及预后。性别(sex)指生物学特征,而社会性别(gender)涵盖社会文化层面,包括行为和身份认同。

结果

社会性别医学领域已从20世纪60年代和70年代的妇女健康运动发展而来,该运动最初旨在解决生殖权利问题以及女性在临床研究中的系统性被排斥问题。随着时间的推移,关注点已扩大到认识所有人群(包括男性和性别多样化个体)中基于性别的差异。尽管取得了进展,但持续存在的挑战依然存在。许多临床指南未充分纳入性别因素考量,女性在临床试验中的代表性仍然不足,导致疗效欠佳且女性不良反应发生率更高。最近的举措,包括政府资助的研究项目、专门的社会性别医学教授职位以及促进公平参与临床试验的监管措施,都是积极的进步。然而,需要一种系统的、跨学科的方法,将对性别敏感的医学全面融入研究、教育和临床实践。本叙述性综述探讨了社会性别医学的历史发展、当前进展及尚存的挑战。我们强调需要改进研究方法、政策变革和针对性干预措施,以确保医疗公平。强调监管支持、教育、行业参与和公众意识的结构化行动计划对于加速该领域的整合至关重要。

结论

认识并应对性别敏感的健康差异将带来更个性化、更有效的医疗护理,最终改善所有人的健康结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/0847959016b0/ECI-55-e70089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/33a6a5aac99f/ECI-55-e70089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/cce25d6890c5/ECI-55-e70089-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/0847959016b0/ECI-55-e70089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/33a6a5aac99f/ECI-55-e70089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/cce25d6890c5/ECI-55-e70089-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/12434427/0847959016b0/ECI-55-e70089-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrating gender medicine into modern healthcare: Progress and barriers.将性别医学融入现代医疗保健:进展与障碍。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Oct;55(10):e70089. doi: 10.1111/eci.70089. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
6
Bridging the United States population diversity gaps in clinical research: roadmap to precision health and reducing health disparities.弥合美国临床研究中的人口多样性差距:精准健康与减少健康差距的路线图。
Per Med. 2025 May 13:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2504329.
7
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
8
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Climate change and gendered vulnerability: A systematic review of women's health.气候变化与性别脆弱性:关于女性健康的系统综述
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251323645. doi: 10.1177/17455057251323645. Epub 2025 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
[The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: implementation and checklist development: a Korean translation].[《研究中的性别平等(SAGER)指南:实施与清单制定:韩文版》]
Ewha Med J. 2024 Jan;47(1):e11. doi: 10.12771/emj.2024.e11. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
2
Teaching Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Medicine Is Not Just a Matter of Content.讲授对性别敏感的医学不仅仅是内容的问题。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Dec 5;11:23821205241304531. doi: 10.1177/23821205241304531. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main disease according to patients' sex: A meta-analysis.
根据患者性别比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的Meta分析
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Feb;55(2):e14348. doi: 10.1111/eci.14348. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Evaluation of male-specific psychoeducation for major depressive disorder compared to cognitive behavioral therapy psychoeducation: A randomized controlled investigation in mentally distressed men.与认知行为疗法心理教育相比,针对男性重性抑郁障碍的男性特异性心理教育评估:对精神困扰男性的一项随机对照研究。
Psychother Res. 2024 Sep 10:1-18. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2398085.
5
Gender and contemporary risk of adverse events in atrial fibrillation.性别与心房颤动患者当代不良事件风险。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3707-3717. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae539.
6
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2024年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动管理指南,与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)联合制定。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3314-3414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176.
7
Neglecting sex and gender in research is a public-health risk.在研究中忽视性别因素是一种公共卫生风险。
Nature. 2024 May;629(8012):527-530. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-01372-2.
8
Differences across the lifespan between females and males in the top 20 causes of disease burden globally: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球疾病负担研究2021中全球疾病负担前20位原因的性别差异:一项系统分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 May;9(5):e282-e294. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00053-7.
9
Impact of sex and gender on post-COVID-19 syndrome, Switzerland, 2020.2020 年瑞士 COVID-19 后综合征的性别影响。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Jan;29(2). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.2.2300200.
10
Assessing the potential of GPT-4 to perpetuate racial and gender biases in health care: a model evaluation study.评估 GPT-4 在医疗保健中延续种族和性别偏见的潜力:一项模型评估研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jan;6(1):e12-e22. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00225-X.