Li Zhiwei, Wang Leyi, Yang Shuting, Luo Bin, Liu Yezi, Chen Mengsi, Wang Changmin
Clinical Laboratory Center, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
Department of Nursing, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0326083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326083. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to explore the molecular subtypes of sepsis and the correlation between immune-related genes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Utilizing the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (GSE65682) with 479 patients with sepsis as the training set and 164 patients treated at our hospital as the independent validation cohort. An unsupervised cluster analysis was used to identify potential molecular subtypes of sepsis, and a weighted gene co-expression network analysis was performed to identify gene modules. Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes, and Genomes enrichment analyses were performed, and the immune status was also evaluated. Using LASSO regression and multivariate Cox regression, an immune-related gene prognostic model was developed, validated, and evaluated, followed by an individual risk scoring system. We identified two molecular subtypes of sepsis that are associated with distinct immune response patterns and clinical outcomes. Patients in Cluster A exhibited poorer survival and enrichment of pro-inflammatory pathways, while those in Cluster B had better outcomes and enrichment of immune regulatory pathways. A 10-gene prognostic model was constructed, stratifying patients into high- and low-risk groups using the estimated risk score that was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor in both the training (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.126, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.096-1.156, P < 0.001) and validation datasets (HR: 1.149, 95% CI: 1.085-1.216, P < 0.001). A risk scoring system was developed based on the risk score and clinical parameters, with estimated mortality probabilities of 0.132 (7-day), 0.211 (14-day), and 0.258 (21-day). High-risk patients had significantly worse prognoses, and this was validated in the independent cohort. Distinct immune cell profiles were found between the two subtypes and risk groups, with B cells, CD8 + T cells, and NK cells elevated in Cluster B. This study identified immune-related molecular subtypes of sepsis and developed a prognostic model that accurately predicts sepsis mortality. These findings provide insights into the immune dysregulation in sepsis and can potentially be used for developing personalized treatment strategies and improving clinical decision-making in sepsis management.
本研究旨在探索脓毒症的分子亚型以及免疫相关基因与脓毒症患者预后之间的相关性。利用基因表达综合数据库(GSE65682)中479例脓毒症患者作为训练集,并将我院治疗的164例患者作为独立验证队列。采用无监督聚类分析来识别脓毒症潜在的分子亚型,并进行加权基因共表达网络分析以识别基因模块。进行基因本体论、京都基因与基因组百科全书富集分析,并评估免疫状态。使用LASSO回归和多变量Cox回归,开发、验证并评估了一个免疫相关基因预后模型,随后建立了个体风险评分系统。我们识别出两种脓毒症分子亚型,它们与不同的免疫反应模式和临床结局相关。A组患者生存率较差且促炎途径富集,而B组患者结局较好且免疫调节途径富集。构建了一个包含10个基因的预后模型,使用估计风险评分将患者分为高风险组和低风险组,该风险评分在训练数据集(风险比[HR]:1.126,95%置信区间[CI]:1.096 - 1.156,P < 0.001)和验证数据集(HR:1.149,95% CI:1.085 - 1.216,P < 0.001)中均被证实为独立预后因素。基于风险评分和临床参数开发了一个风险评分系统,估计7天、14天和21天的死亡概率分别为0.132、0.211和0.258。高风险患者的预后明显更差,这在独立队列中得到了验证。在两种亚型和风险组之间发现了不同的免疫细胞谱,B组中B细胞、CD8 + T细胞和NK细胞升高。本研究识别出脓毒症的免疫相关分子亚型,并开发了一个能准确预测脓毒症死亡率的预后模型。这些发现为脓毒症中的免疫失调提供了见解,并有可能用于制定个性化治疗策略和改善脓毒症管理中的临床决策。