Erbay Dalli Öznur, Kelebek Girgin Nermin
Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Nilüfer, Bursa, Turkey.
Division of Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa City Hospital, Nilüfer, Bursa, Turkey.
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70097. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70097.
Sleep disturbances are common in intensive care units (ICUs) and negatively impact patient outcomes. Understanding differences in sleep quality and disrupting factors between patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) and spontaneously breathing patients (SBP) is essential for improving ICU care.
To compare sleep quality and sleep-disrupting factors between patients receiving MV and SBP during their ICU stay.
This observational study was conducted in a 16-bed ICU in Türkiye. A total of 186 ICU patients (62 receiving MV and 124 SBP) were included. Sleep quality and disrupting factors were assessed using the Modified Freedman Sleep Quality Questionnaire (mFSQQ) and Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) at 24-h admission (T0) and pre-discharge (T1).
Sleep quality scores were significantly lower in patients receiving MV than in SBP (p < 0.05). At T0, patients receiving MV experienced greater sleep disruptions due to pain and vital sign monitoring, while SBP had more disturbances from nursing interventions, medication administration and alarms (p < 0.05). By T1, sleep disturbances from pain, medical interventions and diagnostic procedures had significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05); however, environmental factors such as noise, lighting and staff conversations remained major disruptors. Repeated measures analysis showed a significant time effect for sleep disruptions from pain, nursing interventions, vital sign monitoring and medication administration (p < 0.001), while no time effect was found for noise, light or staff conversations.
Although patients receiving MV had lower sleep quality, ICU environmental factors were a major source of sleep fragmentation for all patients. These findings emphasise the need for ICU-wide and targeted interventions to optimise sleep quality.
Implementing tailored sleep protocols and optimising ICU care can reduce sleep disruptions, enhance patient comfort and improve recovery by addressing both patient-specific and environmental factors.
睡眠障碍在重症监护病房(ICU)中很常见,并且会对患者的预后产生负面影响。了解接受机械通气(MV)的患者与自主呼吸患者(SBP)之间睡眠质量的差异以及干扰因素,对于改善ICU护理至关重要。
比较接受MV的患者与SBP在ICU住院期间的睡眠质量和睡眠干扰因素。
这项观察性研究在土耳其一家拥有16张床位的ICU中进行。共纳入了186名ICU患者(62名接受MV,124名SBP)。在入院24小时(T0)和出院前(T1),使用改良的弗里德曼睡眠质量问卷(mFSQQ)和理查兹 - 坎贝尔睡眠问卷(RCSQ)评估睡眠质量和干扰因素。
接受MV的患者的睡眠质量得分显著低于SBP(p < 0.05)。在T0时,接受MV的患者因疼痛和生命体征监测而经历了更大的睡眠干扰,而SBP则受到护理干预、药物给药和警报的更多干扰(p < 0.05)。到T1时,两组中因疼痛、医疗干预和诊断程序导致的睡眠干扰均显著减少(p < 0.05);然而,噪音、光线和工作人员交谈等环境因素仍然是主要干扰因素。重复测量分析显示,疼痛、护理干预、生命体征监测和药物给药导致的睡眠干扰存在显著的时间效应(p < 0.001),而噪音、光线或工作人员交谈则没有时间效应。
尽管接受MV的患者睡眠质量较低,但ICU环境因素是所有患者睡眠碎片化的主要来源。这些发现强调了在整个ICU范围内进行有针对性干预以优化睡眠质量的必要性。
实施量身定制的睡眠方案并优化ICU护理,可以通过解决患者特定因素和环境因素来减少睡眠干扰,提高患者舒适度并改善康复情况。