Suppr超能文献

颅外颈动脉夹层患者的生物学性别与预后

Biological Sex and Outcomes in Patients with Extracranial Cervical Arterial Dissections.

作者信息

Metanis Issa, Simaan Naaem, Schwartzmann Yoel, Jubeh Tamer, Honig Asaf, Jubran Hamza, Magadle Jad, Gomori John M, Cohen Jose E, Leker Ronen R

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.

The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 29;14(11):3816. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113816.

Abstract

Cervical arterial dissections (CeAD) are a common cause of stroke in young adults across both sexes. Whether biological sex plays a role in the pathogenesis and outcome of CeAD remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with CeAD, clinical, imaging, treatment, and outcome data were compared between females and males using multivariate logistic regressions to identify outcome predictors. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for imbalances between the groups. Overall, 135 participants were included (79 males and 56 females, median age 44, interquartile range [IQR] 36, 50.5). Of those, 71 patients (53%) were diagnosed with stroke (median age 46, IQR 39.5, 52, median admission NIHSS 3, IQR 1, 7.5). Males had significantly higher rates of smoking (38% vs. 11%, = 0.0004) but other baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. Traumatic dissections were numerically more common in men but the difference between the groups did not reach significance. The presence of flame shaped lesion in the extra cranial vessel was more common among men in the initial analysis of the whole group but did not remain significant after PSM. No differences were observed between the groups regarding treatment strategies including administration of systemic thrombolysis and stent placements. The rates of recurrent stroke and recurrent dissections were similar. Favorable outcomes defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) ≤ 2 and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were also similar on the univariate analyses and did not change after PSM. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.04-1.23) and admission NIHSS (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.60-0.84) were associated with outcomes on regression analysis whereas female sex was not (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.03-5.87). CeAD occurs more frequently in males, who are more likely to have associated risk factors and traumatic neck injuries. However, sex does not appear to impact outcome in CeAD patients.

摘要

颈动脉硬化夹层(CeAD)是两性年轻成年人中风的常见原因。生物性别是否在CeAD的发病机制和预后中起作用仍不清楚。在这项对CeAD患者队列的回顾性分析中,使用多变量逻辑回归比较了女性和男性的临床、影像、治疗和预后数据,以确定预后预测因素。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于调整组间不平衡。总体而言,纳入了135名参与者(79名男性和56名女性,中位年龄44岁,四分位间距[IQR]为36,50.5)。其中,71名患者(53%)被诊断为中风(中位年龄46岁,IQR为39.5,52,入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]中位数为3,IQR为1,7.5)。男性吸烟率显著更高(38%对11%,P = 0.0004),但其他基线特征在两组之间没有差异。创伤性夹层在男性中在数字上更常见,但两组之间的差异未达到显著水平。在对整个组的初始分析中,颅外血管中火焰状病变在男性中更常见,但在PSM后不再显著。在包括全身溶栓和支架置入的治疗策略方面,两组之间未观察到差异。复发性中风和复发性夹层的发生率相似。在单变量分析中,定义为改良Rankin量表(mRS)≤2的良好预后和有症状的颅内出血率也相似,并且在PSM后没有变化。在回归分析中,年龄(比值比[OR]为1.12,95%置信区间[CI]为1.04 - 1.23)和入院时NIHSS(OR为0.74,95%CI为0.60 - 0.84)与预后相关,而女性性别则不然(OR为0.54,95%CI为0.03 - 5.87)。CeAD在男性中更频繁发生,他们更有可能有相关的危险因素和颈部创伤性损伤。然而,性别似乎不影响CeAD患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12156125/721b7a7dedb9/jcm-14-03816-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验