Doctoroff Greta L, Wymbs Frances, Chacko Anil, Rabinovitz Eliana
Department of School-Clinical Child Psychology, Ferkauf Graduate School, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.
Department of Primary Care, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA.
Prev Sci. 2025 Jul;26(5):727-739. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01815-w. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Group preventative parent training programs (PPTPs) have been used successfully to improve outcomes for families living in poverty in settings such as Head Start. Nevertheless, such programs face significant enrollment and engagement challenges. Given that research on factors related to parent preferences for group PPTP participation is limited, the purpose of the current study is to examine what types of programs are most preferred by a combined sample of English and Spanish speaking Head Start parents, and to translate program modeling of parent preferences into feasible programming options. The current study relies on conjoint analysis, a technique derived from market research, to learn more about how Head Start parents leverage attributes of a parenting program when making hypothetical participation decisions. Based on a discrete choice experiment with 234 urban, Early Head Start and Head Start parents, findings indicate that parents prioritize program attributes that target strong improvements for their children on desired outcomes, such as academics and friendship skills, while also offering incentives for participation. Simulations indicated that 77.6% of parents preferred an Optimizing Outcomes Program, while 22.4% preferred a Foundational Needs Program. Finally, results indicate that child prosocial or difficult behavior and parent depression risk are associated with specific program preferences. Parents with fewer resources prefer programs that are more foundational and realistic to target more modest gains. Implications are discussed in terms of program modeling and offering programs tailored to preferences.
团体预防性家长培训项目(PPTPs)已成功用于改善诸如“启智计划”等项目中贫困家庭的状况。然而,此类项目面临着显著的招生和参与挑战。鉴于关于家长对团体PPTP参与偏好相关因素的研究有限,本研究的目的是调查英语和西班牙语双语的“启智计划”家长组合样本最喜欢哪种类型的项目,并将家长偏好的项目模式转化为可行的项目选项。本研究采用联合分析,这是一种源自市场研究的技术,以了解更多关于“启智计划”家长在做出假设性参与决策时如何权衡育儿项目属性的情况。基于对234名城市地区的“早期启智计划”和“启智计划”家长进行的离散选择实验,研究结果表明,家长优先考虑那些能在学业和交友技能等期望成果方面让孩子有显著进步,同时还提供参与激励措施的项目属性。模拟结果表明,77.6%的家长更喜欢优化成果项目,而22.4%的家长更喜欢基本需求项目。最后,研究结果表明,孩子的亲社会行为或问题行为以及家长的抑郁风险与特定的项目偏好相关。资源较少的家长更喜欢更基础、更现实的项目,以实现更适度的收益。本文从项目模式和提供符合偏好的项目方面讨论了研究结果的意义。